RailUK Forums
RailUK Forums > UK Railway Forums > Infrastructure & Stations

Click to visit us on Facebook

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Unread 17th May 2012, 21:16   #16
Trog
Member
 
Trog's Avatar
 
Join Date: 30 Oct 2009
Posts: 576
Default

The Up Goods Loop at Tring had a couple of stretches of LNWR material in it until the platform layout was altered in about 2003.

I have also been told that the Platform Loop at Bicester North was never relayed. Same track in use from opening until twin track was restored, on the Chiltern Line.

Back in the 1980's there was a lead into the cement works at Chinnor, that was such old material it had the keys on the inside of the rails, I am only aware of that sort of chair in one other place and that is now out of use.

On the bridge front the access line into Wolverton Works used an original L&B bridge span dating from 1838? to cross the canal until it as replaced by a modern ARP girder bridge in about 1990. The existing bridge was only replaced as it was restricted to shunting locos only, and they wanted to be able to get mainline locos into the works.
__________________
Mumble mumble back in my young day..... 48hr shift.... no lunch break.... up hill both ways... thankful for it...... c**p behind gorse bush.... three feet of snow... ballast minutes not printed on soft paper.... risk of arsenick poisioning.... mumble mumble .. don't know they are born....
Trog is offline  
Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today!
Unread 17th May 2012, 22:23   #17
Tiny Tim
Railway enthusiast
Member
 
Tiny Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: 6 Jan 2012
Location: Devizes, Wiltshire.
Posts: 401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John55 View Post
I presume you realise that many of the bridges upon which the track is laid are made out of metal and are anything up to 170 years old.

I regularly travel over the Ethelfleda/Britannia Bridge at Runcorn Gap which was built in 1869. It is not made out of steel but wrought iron. Do I fear I am going to drop into the river or canal? No!
With a few notable exceptions (Tay Bridge, for starters) the Victorian engineers were very well aware of the limitations of the materials available to them. Designs of bridges changed considerably when steel became available in quantity, but as the early Bessemer steel suffered from consistency problems, a 'belt and braces' approach continued. Thanks to this policy, many large railway structures survive in use despite the unreliable materials used. The longevity of these bridges contrasts sharply with that of more recent civil engineering. Hammersmith Flyover, anyone?)
Tiny Tim is offline  
Unread 17th May 2012, 22:26   #18
DXMachina
Member
 
Join Date: 24 Oct 2011
Posts: 477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John55 View Post
I presume you realise that many of the bridges upon which the track is laid are made out of metal and are anything up to 170 years old.
I've ridden over and cycled under a WCML Stephenson bridge that's over 170. Doesnt scare me. Bridges are built to last. Rails are more of a passing thing.
DXMachina is offline  
Unread 17th May 2012, 22:59   #19
CarltonA
CarltonA
Member
 
Join Date: 22 Apr 2012
Location: Denham
Posts: 114
Default

Oldest track on the network? Though not in use for many, many years and having no rails there are stone blocks in the trackbed at Simpasture Junction on the Bishop Auckland line which are Stockton & Darlington in origin. These were used instead of sleepers. I'm not absolutely sure they are still there but I saw them a few years back.
CarltonA is offline  
Unread 17th May 2012, 23:00   #20
class26
Member
 
Join Date: 4 May 2011
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DXMachina View Post
I've ridden over and cycled under a WCML Stephenson bridge that's over 170. Doesnt scare me. Bridges are built to last. Rails are more of a passing thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichmondCommu View Post
Any ideas? I'm guessing that it would have to be a lightly used branch line outside of the SE which never saw anything else other than DMU's. I'm thinking perhaps the Colne branch although a Pacer and old jointed track can't be much fun!
When they relaid some of the track between Boston and Skegness recently some equipment ws found to have been the original. Not sure when it was laid but it was not in the 2oth century !
class26 is offline  
Unread 17th May 2012, 23:05   #21
RichmondCommu
Established Member
 
Join Date: 23 Feb 2010
Location: Richmond, London
Posts: 1,395
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by class26 View Post
When they relaid some of the track between Boston and Skegness recently some equipment ws found to have been the original. Not sure when it was laid but it was not in the 2oth century !
Blimey, thats crazy when you think that in the past Class 20's, Class 47's and HST's have run over that route! Hopefully it didn't go for scrap and is now sitting in someone's shed!
RichmondCommu is offline  
Unread 18th May 2012, 06:48   #22
class26
Member
 
Join Date: 4 May 2011
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichmondCommu View Post
Blimey, thats crazy when you think that in the past Class 20's, Class 47's and HST's have run over that route! Hopefully it didn't go for scrap and is now sitting in someone's shed!
It was quoted in "Moderrn Railways" that the workers were surprised to discover this !!
class26 is offline  
Unread 18th May 2012, 12:41   #23
Cliveblackpool
Member
 
Join Date: 6 Sep 2011
Posts: 551
Default

Wrought iron does not rust nearly as fast as mild steel.
It has not been produced since the 50's.
Bespoke wrought ironwork (as opposed to bent steel!) makers still use wrought iron. Not cheap to buy either!
Old iron railway bridges are one of the best sources.
Cliveblackpool is offline  
Unread 18th May 2012, 15:44   #24
John55
Member
 
Join Date: 24 Jun 2011
Location: South East
Posts: 800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichmondCommu View Post
Blimey, thats crazy when you think that in the past Class 20's, Class 47's and HST's have run over that route! Hopefully it didn't go for scrap and is now sitting in someone's shed!
How big a shed do you think people have that you expect them to be able to store several miles of rail?

If the track/rail is in good condition why is it crazy to run locos and HSTs over it? After all the diesels (and especially DMUs) are much kinder to the track than the steam locos which ran over it in previous times. Before the track was replaced there were severe restrictions (in the later days) on what rolling stock could use the line and how often as Network Rail were well aware of the age and condition of the track.

I attended a lecture about 10 years ago given by an engineer from either Tube Lines or Metronet and he raised a great deal of astonishment when he said the Bakerloo, Piccadilly and Charing Cross branch of the Northern were about to have the first ever track renewal carried out on the original sections of the lines dating from the early 1900s. When questioned he said the rails had been replaced fairly often but everything else was more or less original. This was possible only because of the unusual atmosphere in the tunnels (i.e. no rain!).
John55 is offline  
Unread 23rd May 2012, 12:53   #25
Speedbird2639
Member
 
Speedbird2639's Avatar
 
Join Date: 28 Jun 2011
Posts: 21
Default

Slight cheat as not part of the network since the 1960's (but people have been suggesting sidings which probably haven't been in use since that time as well)

I give the original insitu rails of the Cromford and High Peak Railway 1825!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Picture 075.jpg (218.5 KB, 57 views)
Speedbird2639 is offline  
Unread 23rd May 2012, 20:11   #26
matchmaker
Going for a chang
Member
 
matchmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: 8 Mar 2009
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 344
Default

I wonder how old the track is on the various sections of the West Highland Line?
matchmaker is offline  
Unread 23rd May 2012, 20:32   #27
emoaconr
Member
 
emoaconr's Avatar
 
Join Date: 20 Apr 2009
Location: Wrexham, United Kingdom
Posts: 220
Default

When the Cambrian Line was relaid about 2 years ago, it was found a lot of the old bullhead rail there dated to the 19th Century.

Similary the Borderlands Line is in very poor condition in places with ancient chair fittings throughout, however there is a re-laying programme going on at the moment.
__________________
Travelled on: 121, 142, 143, 150, 153, 156, 158, 170, 175, 185, 220, 221, 350, 390, 444, 450, 507, 508, 43/3, 57/2, 67/2, 91/4
Travelled with: AW, GR, GW, LM, ME, NT, SW, TP, VT, WB, XC
emoaconr is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:21.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© RailUK Forums 2005 - the year after 2012