RailUK Forums
RailUK Forums > UK Railway Forums > Traction & Rolling Stock


Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Unread 20th May 2012, 21:41   #16
hello
Member
 
Join Date: 9 Jun 2008
Posts: 71
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by starrymarkb View Post
It's in the Group Standards, New stock on the main line (and these would not count as previously used) must have a separate door for the driver to access the track away from any passengers. Look at the 444s and 175s as an example.

The Sprinters and Pacers were built before the requirement. hence drivers must use a passenger door to access the track...

What adjacent door? the only side doors on 67/72 stock are in the passenger saloon
what about pendolino?
hello is offline  
Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today!
Unread 20th May 2012, 22:17   #17
Peter Mugridge
Established Member
 
Peter Mugridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: 8 Apr 2010
Location: Epsom
Posts: 3,515
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drsatan View Post
Sorry, was referring to the passenger door nearest to the drivers cab. Should have made myself clearer
You'd have to block off a third of the carriage from passengers to do this though - if they are used in two car formation like the 1938 stock that's only going to leave one and a third carriages usable per unit.
Peter Mugridge is offline  
Unread 22nd May 2012, 14:10   #18
507 001
Member
 
507 001's Avatar
 
Join Date: 3 Dec 2008
Location: Huyton
Posts: 441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hello View Post
what about pendolino?
They have a dedicated crew door.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rob_rossington
Professional Photographer & Welsh Highland Railway Guard
507 001 is offline  
Unread 23rd May 2012, 00:06   #19
Michael.Y
Member
 
Join Date: 13 Oct 2011
Posts: 956
Default

You can't use former Cut+Cover / Subsurface stock on the IOW anyhoo due to the height of the Ryde tunnels; it would have to be Tube / Deep Level stock. I thought the ex-Victoria Line 67 would have been a shoe-in until I read the above reasoning.
Michael.Y is offline  
Unread 23rd May 2012, 08:35   #20
BestWestern
"Transforming Trouble..."
Established Member
 
BestWestern's Avatar
 
Join Date: 6 Feb 2011
Posts: 2,377
Default

I saw in a paper yesterday some bumph about the latest Bond film, which apparently includes a scene with a "tube train crashing through a wall". No idea where or why, but I was curious as to whether they'd used some of this withdrawn stock in filming, any ideas?

Surely Eastleigh is (relatively) secure, so the yobs must have got to these prior to them being moved? Where else have they been stored, and why the long wait for scrapping?
BestWestern is offline  
Unread 23rd May 2012, 09:02   #21
swt_passenger
Established Member
 
Join Date: 7 Apr 2010
Posts: 5,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BestWestern View Post

Surely Eastleigh is (relatively) secure, so the yobs must have got to these prior to them being moved? Where else have they been stored, and why the long wait for scrapping?
I definitely read that they arrived from an LT depot in that condition.
swt_passenger is offline  
Unread 23rd May 2012, 09:30   #22
millemille
Member
 
Join Date: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BestWestern View Post
I saw in a paper yesterday some bumph about the latest Bond film, which apparently includes a scene with a "tube train crashing through a wall". No idea where or why, but I was curious as to whether they'd used some of this withdrawn stock in filming, any ideas?
The trailer I've seen for the film looks like a Jubilee or Northern line unit.
millemille is offline  
Unread 23rd May 2012, 09:55   #23
BestWestern
"Transforming Trouble..."
Established Member
 
BestWestern's Avatar
 
Join Date: 6 Feb 2011
Posts: 2,377
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by millemille View Post
The trailer I've seen for the film looks like a Jubilee or Northern line unit.
Ah, presumably it's a mock-up or CGI then?
BestWestern is offline  
Unread 23rd May 2012, 10:21   #24
millemille
Member
 
Join Date: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BestWestern View Post
Ah, presumably it's a mock-up or CGI then?
Could be, but there were several spares of the composite cab sections made as part of the original build so it's not beyond possible that one of these was used and enhanced with CGI...
millemille is offline  
Unread 23rd May 2012, 13:00   #25
Peter Mugridge
Established Member
 
Peter Mugridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: 8 Apr 2010
Location: Epsom
Posts: 3,515
Default

They used a mock up; they even built a full size mock up tube station in one of the studios!
Peter Mugridge is offline  
Unread 23rd May 2012, 21:10   #26
BestWestern
"Transforming Trouble..."
Established Member
 
BestWestern's Avatar
 
Join Date: 6 Feb 2011
Posts: 2,377
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Mugridge View Post
They used a mock up; they even built a full size mock up tube station in one of the studios!
That's very interesting...
BestWestern is offline  
Unread 23rd May 2012, 21:56   #27
Peter Mugridge
Established Member
 
Peter Mugridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: 8 Apr 2010
Location: Epsom
Posts: 3,515
Default

There was something about it in ( I think ) one of the free newspapers about 2 - 3 months ago when they were doing a feature on Bond. It included a photograph of the mock up in the mocked up station showing the film crew off the side of the platform where you'd normally have the wall.
Peter Mugridge is offline  
Unread 24th May 2012, 18:11   #28
whhistle
Member
 
Join Date: 30 Dec 2010
Posts: 409
Default

Shame they don't think about using the older stock on Cov-Bhm or even Cross City. A line with many stops only a few miles apart.

Get round the crew door issue by blocking off half the carriage (including that door) to get some air conditioning in the trains. Create a proper gangway and surely you're on to a winner?
whhistle is offline  
Unread 24th May 2012, 18:27   #29
sprinterguy
Travelling Pass
Established Member
 
sprinterguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 4 Mar 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 5,488
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whhistle View Post
Shame they don't think about using the older stock on Cov-Bhm or even Cross City. A line with many stops only a few miles apart.

Get round the crew door issue by blocking off half the carriage (including that door) to get some air conditioning in the trains. Create a proper gangway and surely you're on to a winner?
If that post wasn't meant in jest, as I suspect it is, then you'd be even more barking mad than the Harrogate Chamber of Commerce!
__________________
Most recent journeys:
07/05 LM 350113
10:50 Coventry - B'ham New Street
sprinterguy is offline  
Unread 24th May 2012, 21:56   #30
antharro
Member
 
Join Date: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 73
Default

Bringing this back on topic...










Colindale via Charing Cross?



To avoid forum blow-out, these are resized versions of just a few of the pics I took.
You can find the rest at higher resolutions HERE.
antharro is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 20:16.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© RailUK Forums 2005 - the year after 2012