In that case, my apologies to all concerned, but I think the round shall have to be considered a dud. clagmonster's absence today, combined with my absence yesterday, has created a situation in which no play has occurred and therefore Rules 3.4 and 3.5 should be applied.
It is very likely that clagmonster was referring to Rainham (Essex), but I am sorry to say we cannot clarify this and it has been too long since the last discussion on the matter so we will have to pass on it. To compensate, I will suggest that the next time Robinson wins a round set by clagmonster, the former should surrender the floor to the latter. This is not a concrete requirement; rather something for them to agree on.
Robinson's floor.