![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: 23 Apr 2012
Posts: 61
|
FCC have their ticket barriers set to reject all Child tickets. Apparently there was a bit of a problem with fare evasion.
|
|
|
| Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today! |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 124
|
I was challenged today at Tulse Hill in relation to my North Dulwich - Elephant and Castle season ticket.
Without wanting to refer to routing guides, as I don't understand them, I just said that in order to go from Elephant to N Dulwich I have to pass through Tulse Hill so therefore I can get off early. This was enough to have him open the gate. I don't know if he was entirely convinced though. Having to ask them to open the gate has become a bit of a pain. I'd love it if Southern would just programme the barrier to make it operate. By the way, if I do Tulse - Elephant most often, do Southern earn a bit more if I buy the ticket from North Dulwich because I need to travel on both companies' trains? |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 15 Jan 2010
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 4,889
|
Had smiler trouble a couple of weeks ago with a Winchester to Eastbourne SDR route Not London ticket a Clapham Junction, the security guard (why are they checking tickets at clapham Junction?) kept insisting it wasn't valid at clapham Junction as the origin was Winchester, after I persisted he he reluctantly let me pass though the gate so I could show it to a member of SWT staff.
It's rather annoying when they program the gates to reject BoJ particularly in an area where its rare for BoJ to be prohibited. |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
admiring the bridges
Fares Advisor
Join Date: 21 Dec 2007
Location: Newcastle (unless I'm out)
Posts: 4,691
|
I wonder if you might be confusing some of the explanations which have already been posted here, with the complex validity arising from the Routing Guide? The programming of barriers is certainly not attempting to replicate that coding of validity; they are attempting to capture a proportion of passengers which is proportionate to the available inspection staff, and whose tickets fall within recognised parameters of abuse.
The best example given above was the setting to reject all Railcard discounted tickets. That has nothing to do with Routing or validity. Its not even something which a barrier COULD confirm. But it is just a recognised form of fare evasion which is easily confirmed if the barrier rejects the ticket in the first instance and requies manual verification (of the Railcard). A similar check might be applied to Child tickets or Off-Peak tickets during peak hours. Quote:
I've deduced that they are probably operating correctly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
South West Trains
Member
Join Date: 8 Mar 2011
Posts: 983
|
That would have been STM agency staff who cover the Gateline role at London stations, they don't get much ticket training but are not as bad as G4S I'd say!
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 15 Jan 2010
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 4,889
|
Quote:
--- old post above --- --- new post below --- Agreed, everything G4S touch seems to end in a right cack-up in my experience and I'm not just thinking of Olympic security either! Last edited by wintonian; 25th September 2012 at 21:42. Reason: Double post prevention system |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 9 Feb 2011
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 3,133
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|