![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: 20 Jul 2011
Posts: 114
|
Tonight I've made a booking for an Advanced Ticket from Kendal to 'Manchester Stations' as I'm not sure if Deansgate, Oxford Road or PIcadilly would best fit my circumstances (a friend is collecting me in Manchester), however, when the confirmation email has come through, the journey destination is Manchester Picadilly ( When I checked the fares, all 3 stations were identically priced).
Does anyone know if I'd get in bother for getting off at Deansgate, rather than staying on to Picadilly ? p.s. when the ticket comes, it may say Manchester Stations and I've wasted the time of you good people |
|
|
| Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: 21 Oct 2010
Posts: 902
|
Is Deansgate classed as a Manchester stn? Might be worth buying a Man Picc to Deansgate ticket from Kendal just in case
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Kent-residing Yam Yam
Member
Join Date: 3 Jan 2010
Location: Margate, Kent
Posts: 333
|
Quote:
Whenever I've bought Advances to Manchester, the ticket generally always says "Manchester Stns", but the reservation - the bit that tells you which train you're booked on - is to a named station. I'd imagine this is the case most of the time. If your booked itinerary is to Manchester Piccadilly then you must alight there. If I understand your route you're coming into Manchester on a Transpenine Express service via Deansgate? In which case, yes it would be stopping short, which is not allowed. So you'll need the extra ticket and to go via Manchester Picc.
__________________
2013 Mileage: 3,755 mi 12 ch (to 12 May) Last Journey: Sandwich - Margate on 2R50+1J82 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
170397
Established Member
Join Date: 7 Nov 2008
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 7,561
|
Stopping short for me is always something that is grey area for me as to whether it could be enforceable, but I really can't imagine this being enforcable. You have bought & paid for a ticket to Manchester Stations, and you are getting off at what is (officially, not just a station in Manchester) a Manchester station
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Slow Train
Established Member
Join Date: 16 Jun 2011
Location: t'North
Posts: 1,321
|
Not that it's relevant here but Victoria is also in the Manchester Stns group.
If you have an advance I presume it's with TPE so your booked train may not stop at Deansgate. Whatever your reservation says, it's very unlikely anyone will ask for it once you have left the train. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
MIET AMIMechE MIEEE(Soon)
Established Member
Join Date: 2 Mar 2007
Location: In a tunnel, not in London...
Posts: 6,365
|
If you're coming from Kendal the chances are it will not stop at Deansgate unless you're changing at Preston as well...
Everything (most services) from TPE off Lancaster do not call at Deansgate, except early morning and late evening services interworking with Blackpool North services. Isn't a very long walk from Oxford Road though.
__________________
The views expressed above do not necessarily reflect those of my current, future or former employers, the IET, IMechE or InstMC. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: 19 Oct 2010
Location: Yeovil Somerset
Posts: 337
|
Quote:
Surely it's in every TOC's interest if every advance passenger gets off early ? juist me then ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
MIET AMIMechE MIEEE(Soon)
Established Member
Join Date: 2 Mar 2007
Location: In a tunnel, not in London...
Posts: 6,365
|
Not really on this route, these services pick up very very few passengers at Oxford Road and Piccadilly.
__________________
The views expressed above do not necessarily reflect those of my current, future or former employers, the IET, IMechE or InstMC. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
TOC employee
Established Member
Join Date: 14 Apr 2008
Posts: 5,194
|
Quote:
If the reservation is to Oxford Road, I believe there is an easement to travel back to Deansgate and provided it is a non-reservable service is used it would be legitimate.
__________________
These views are my own and not, in any way, those of my employer, though they may choose to agree with them if they wish. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 9 Feb 2011
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 3,140
|
Will the ticket be 'tpe only' or 'tpe and connexions'?
If the latter, and assuming you don't double back, then (in my opinion) going picc-deansgate would be okay. If tpe only then no validity at all on northern. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: 18 Oct 2010
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 103
|
I think for any Manchester Stns ticket you are perfectly entitled to stop at any of them regardless of your booked destination. You would only be stopping short if it were before any of these - eg Salford Crescent.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: 19 Oct 2010
Location: Yeovil Somerset
Posts: 337
|
Quote:
The first rule of any financial claim is that loss must have been suffered , the company has been paid to the furthest point so there is no loss.... ... gets down off high horse |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
admiring the bridges
Fares Advisor
Join Date: 21 Dec 2007
Location: Newcastle (unless I'm out)
Posts: 4,698
|
There is logic in the rule!
Firstly, the era of fares being priced by distance is in the distant past. Now, fares are priced by a combination of inherited conditions (including 'regulated fares'), revenue generation and market forces. Competition between Operators has driven some prices down, and, at the same time, and in order to maintain the prices within a 'fares basket' within the permitted annual inflationary margin, causes other fares to rise. Now I will agree that the range of fares currently available appear irrational, but I hope you'll agree that generating revenue and responding to market forces are logical pressures on the dynamics of fare pricing. The interesting one is the Advance Fare. Operators can introduce these at as low a price as they wish, for a variety of purposes: to attract passengers onto otherwise lightly loaded services, to provide attractive headline prices for promotional purposes, to attract passenger to travel by rail rather than other modes. These are, as a consequence, going to be cheaper than other ticket types and are very specific contracts for specified point to point journeys on specific trains. Its only 'logical' if these special Contracts to fill specific seats on certain legs of a longer journey are tied to just that: from point to point on the specified train only. Now, turning to stopping short on an Advance in Manchester, I refer the OP to my answer to an identical question raised the day previously, here : Fares advice Grimsby - Newcastle. My post is number 6. If the passenger also bought a ticket from the end of the Contracted journey back to the point where (s)he wanted to alight early (Picadilly to Deansgate) then although there is no 'rule' that permits stopping short with such an additional ticket, I believe that any challenge at Deansgate would not, and could not, be pursued. |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: 19 Oct 2010
Location: Yeovil Somerset
Posts: 337
|
Quote:
I hope I don't get into a situation where I have to challenge this t&c |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
I'm from M390
Established Member
Join Date: 30 Dec 2010
Location: SE12
Posts: 5,597
|
There is a financial loss, because the fare to the nearer point might have been higher, and if the customer had purchased that fare, the TOC would have made more money!
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|