RailUK Forums
RailUK Forums > UK Railway Forums > UK Railway Discussion


Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Unread 10th July 2012, 00:51   #1
Pumbaa
Established Member
 
Join Date: 19 Feb 2008
Location: North
Posts: 4,287
Default IEP - signed

As it says. IEP officially confirmed 9th July as replacement for HST fleet with first load to be signed off and officially announced 20th July.

Cheers RF for the heads up. Exact numbers to follow - they look to be released on the same day as Greenings announcement, influenced by Swansea electrification...?

A toast to Mr Baker is in order. Thanks Stuart for giving us all a train nobody wanted. Thanks a bunch.


(created new topic to hopefully prevent it getting assimilated by fantasy hype).
Pumbaa is offline  
Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today!
Unread 10th July 2012, 00:54   #2
fgwrich
Established Member
 
fgwrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: 15 Apr 2009
Location: The North (Of The South) Of the Southern Great Western!
Posts: 2,350
Default

God help us, Cheers Goverment / Hammond.

Still, looks like the Japanese will do well out of us for the next couple of years...

IEP, The Train looking for a home.
fgwrich is offline  
Unread 10th July 2012, 01:08   #3
ainsworth74
Moderator
 
ainsworth74's Avatar
 
Join Date: 16 Nov 2009
Location: Redcar
Posts: 8,845
Default

Bugger. That is all.
ainsworth74 is offline  
Unread 10th July 2012, 01:13   #4
Masboroughlad
Member
 
Masboroughlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2 Mar 2011
Location: Midlands
Posts: 836
Default

so what are we going to get?

does it close the door on franchise creativity? hope not.
Masboroughlad is offline  
Unread 10th July 2012, 02:08   #5
David
Talking Trains?
Established Member
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: 9 Jul 2005
Location: Scunthorpe
Posts: 4,655
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fgwrich View Post
God help us, Cheers Goverment / Hammond.
It's not them you should be thanking. It's the author of a "popular" rail atlas who has bull****ted about the IEP all the way and got it foisted upon us.
__________________
Latest Gallery BSB @ Cadwell Park August 2012
David is offline  
Unread 10th July 2012, 05:50   #6
Failed Unit
Established Member
 
Join Date: 26 Jan 2009
Location: Central Belt
Posts: 3,937
Default

Very surprised there is no press release and it isn't on the breakfast headlines yet with the spin of how it will save UK railways. I guess we will see what is signed hoping no Bi-Modes but I can't see that myself to be honest even if Swansea gets wires.

Yes you could drag the 91s and Mk4 north of Edinburgh, drop Hull and Lincoln from East Coast, but I suspect the Bi-Mode will survive because of the lack of non-electrified diversion routes on the ECML which we don't really have enough HST to cover. Although it would be nice to see 67 drags between Newcastle and Carlisle.

Before anyone says - What about Harrogate? I am sure it will be electrified before 2020.

We will wait and see what is announced as this is batch 1 if the wires go to Swansea maybe we won't need Bi-modes for that batch and the debate will go on for the ECML franchise.
Failed Unit is offline  
Unread 10th July 2012, 05:55   #7
WatcherZero
Established Member
 
Join Date: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 4,084
Default

Government will be sitting on it until the other major announcement this week. Hitachi Chairman in an interview three days ago said they had just secured the financing for 330 coaches for the GWML, it will take them another year to secure the financing for the 270 ECML carriages. Both Hitachi and Siemens have had trouble securing the financing to underwrite their deals in the current economic climate, probably why the Government has decided to underwrite the Crossrail deal itself.
WatcherZero is offline  
Unread 10th July 2012, 06:08   #8
The Planner
Established Member
 
Join Date: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 3,204
Default

Position on the board of Hitachi for Mr Baker ?
The Planner is offline  
Unread 10th July 2012, 06:11   #9
Oliver
Member
 
Join Date: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 340
Default

Yes there are lots of issues related to IEP, particularly the bi-mode version, but realistically ANY fleet of new trains is better than no order for new trains.
Oliver is offline  
Unread 10th July 2012, 06:40   #10
Failed Unit
Established Member
 
Join Date: 26 Jan 2009
Location: Central Belt
Posts: 3,937
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver View Post
Yes there are lots of issues related to IEP, particularly the bi-mode version, but realistically ANY fleet of new trains is better than no order for new trains.
I disagree I would rather have no order than the wrong order considering we are going to be paying for them for the next 30 years. Look at the pacer now! Would people have preferred we waited longer for more sprinters?
Failed Unit is offline  
Unread 10th July 2012, 07:08   #11
WatcherZero
Established Member
 
Join Date: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 4,084
Default

Would people have been happy now if they ordered half as many of the more expensive Sprinters?
WatcherZero is offline  
Unread 10th July 2012, 07:31   #12
Failed Unit
Established Member
 
Join Date: 26 Jan 2009
Location: Central Belt
Posts: 3,937
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WatcherZero View Post
Would people have been happy now if they ordered half as many of the more expensive Sprinters?
Everyone, the first gen DMUs needed replacing by law so the would have got replaced eventually. Anyway bad comparison in this case the IEP is the most expensive option! They could replace the HST with cheaper trains such as the pendo. :-/
Failed Unit is offline  
Unread 10th July 2012, 07:41   #13
Yew
Undergraduate Engineer
Established Member
 
Yew's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12 Mar 2011
Location: Lincoln/Mansfield
Posts: 2,575
Default

Oh yay, the current government fad of Bi-mode MU's kicking real rolling stock off the mainline. Since the government have all the wrong criteria for train selection
__________________
The ancient Romans only gathered once a week, because that was enough forum.
Yew is offline  
Unread 10th July 2012, 07:45   #14
HSTEd
Established Member
 
Join Date: 14 Jul 2011
Posts: 3,476
Default

When can we expect the electrification project announcement which presumably decided how many trains of which types to buy?
HSTEd is online now  
Unread 10th July 2012, 07:59   #15
PhilipW
Philip
Member
 
Join Date: 6 Feb 2008
Location: Fareham, Hants
Posts: 579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pumbaa View Post
As it says. IEP officially confirmed 9th July as replacement for HST fleet with first load signed off.
"As it says ......." ?

What is 'it' ?
Is this a made up post ?
I see no evidence of anyone saying anything ?
PhilipW is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 17:52.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© RailUK Forums 2005 - the year after 2012