![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Retired man of lesiure
Member
Join Date: 15 Jul 2011
Location: Auchtermuchty
Posts: 56
|
Evening Ladies and Gents,
can someone help me solve a argument between 3 retired auld fogies here. are 91's + coaches cleared to run over the tyne valley given the height of the tunnel between Haltwhistle and Bardon Mill? I ask this because i remember learning approx 4 years ago 91's+coaches not being allowed loco hauled through the tunnels at Sunderland North owing to the height/clearence between the panto/tunnel roof - and i could swear blind that the tunnel at Haltwhistle is roughly the same height. can anyone who has access to the required info solve this dilemma for me! Many Thanks Jock |
|
|
| Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: 25 May 2012
Location: Manchester
Posts: 385
|
Was in one of the magazines a few months ago that 91/MkIV sets will be dragged over the Tyne Valley line during engineering works in September.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
admiring the bridges
Fares Advisor
Join Date: 21 Dec 2007
Location: Newcastle (unless I'm out)
Posts: 4,689
|
It appears that the regular autumn diversions of East Coast services this year might be much briefer than in recent years - perhaps only on the weekend of 15th Sept. But please note that this is not reliable nor confirmed information.
In recent years, these diversions have been achieved by deploying HST sets over the route, though I do seem to recall an exceptional dragged electric set 2, 3 or perhaps more years ago. (I'd be a lousy spotter!) Sorry that I can't add much more information. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: 14 Jul 2012
Posts: 51
|
According to the sectional appendix Class 91 locos must have the pantograph locked down when passing through Whitchester tunnel, or else are limited to 15mph.
The restrictions at Sunderland are probably due to the presence of DC wiring. In neither place is there any restriction on Mk4 coaches. They were built to a tilt-compatible profile, but never tilted, so they are quite narrow and don't have clearance problems. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: 21 Oct 2009
Posts: 346
|
Quote:
Yep According to Railways Illistrated September 15th 1E06 0650 Glasgow-Kings X 1S13 1100 Kings X-Edinburgh 1E29 1839 Edinburgh-Newcastle |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: 29 Dec 2010
Posts: 570
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 13 May 2008
Posts: 6,230
|
It would appear, from the East Coast site, that this is the case
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Established Member
Join Date: 7 Apr 2010
Posts: 5,132
|
Quote:
The recently re-issued online SA includes: Quote:
Last edited by swt_passenger; 11th August 2012 at 15:36. |
||
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Retired man of lesiure
Member
Join Date: 15 Jul 2011
Location: Auchtermuchty
Posts: 56
|
Thank you for resolving this one
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 13 May 2008
Posts: 6,230
|
As an aside, if you're travelling Glasgow-London early in the morning that day, are insistent on going via the Tyne valley but aren't worried about the stock, you're better off taking the 0710 TPE to Carlisle and boarding the EC HST from Edinburgh there!
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 9 Feb 2008
Posts: 1,298
|
Sorry, just for those of us with imaginations. When you say pantograph locked down, are you saying locked by a switch in the cab or locked as in bike chain and padlock (hey, these days nothing surprises me)
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|