![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: 2 Feb 2012
Posts: 152
|
I would like to draw forum memebers' attention to the STILL ONGOING campaign for an improved service on the Heart of Wales line. Despite a reasonably positive cost benefit study 2 years ago the line continues to soldier on with a timetable which seems to serve no one satisfactorily.
The line has to be operated with the minimum number of units to provide 4 trains each way resulting in the first trains in each direction running as virtually empty stock for much of their journies. The first train arrives in Swansea just after 9am.....useless for commuter traffic and far too early for leisure traffic!! The first Salop bound train leaves Swansea at 0435! And there are more unsatisfactory aspects to the timetable. Have a look if you're not familiar. Anyway, there is yet another project underway to campaign for the fifth train which is at the stage of requiring stakeholder feedback. I would like to encourage as many of you as possible to respond......the line needs all the help it can get!! Unfortunately getting info on what is happening on the line is sometimes difficult as the two websites are unimaginative, uninspiring and uninformative......Fishguard trains website have managed to create so much more in just campaigning on behalf of one station!!! Have a click on to http://www.heart-of-wales.co.uk/news.htm#support for a bit more information. If you want to read the WELTAG Cost/Benefit analysis of two years ago it's at: http://www.heart-of-wales.co.uk/Howl..._reportfv2.pdf |
|
|
| Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
public class WES:REP
Established Member
Join Date: 17 Jun 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 1,058
|
Not wishing to burst your bubble, but where is the rolling stock going to come from to allow a more frequent service to operate? I'm not familiar with the setup for south wales, but I'd be suprised if there were any units currently spare, especially now Fishguard gets a better service.
If this is the case, then the electrification of the Cardiff Valley lines (due around 2020, IIRC?) might need to happen first, so that some units (ideally class 150s) can be freed up for the Heart of Wales line. I'm all for getting a better service on rural lines, but sadly we can't just buy single DMUs. (Unless you want a Class 139 Parry-people mover to be used!)
__________________
1115 stations (some of them closed!) online | I own 121020 and 423417 "It's not for the government to micro-manage the industry" -DfT |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: 2 Feb 2012
Posts: 152
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 19 Aug 2008
Location: South Wales
Posts: 3,880
|
Personally I Have to agree with NSEFAN on this ATW simply dont have many spare units available at the moment.
Hopefully once electrification of the Cardiff Valley lines and SWML to Swansea are completed there should be a good number of class 150's & class 153's available. I do agree however the heart of wales line deserves a far better service with trains extended beyond Shrewsbury to Crewe so a full 2 hourly service like the Pembroke Dock branch gets would be ideal. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
public class WES:REP
Established Member
Join Date: 17 Jun 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 1,058
|
Quote:
-Removing a DMU from a diagram elsewhere -Sourcing a single DMU from another TOC (unlikely as most TOCs with DMUs are also asking for more stock!) -A major cascade of stock (such as the valley lines which I mentioned before) Making noises is only the start. Someone has to address these issues before the service can be improved.
__________________
1115 stations (some of them closed!) online | I own 121020 and 423417 "It's not for the government to micro-manage the industry" -DfT |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: 1 May 2012
Posts: 554
|
If there was a will to provide the exrtra services I don't think providing the extra unit(s) would be the main issue. That, I fear, would be the contractual negotiations as ATW tried to get as much money as possible out of somebody (the WAG?)!
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 8 Mar 2009
Location: Wrexham/ Denbighshire /Flintshire triangle
Posts: 4,117
|
Quote:
Currently ATW are looking at chopping services on lines that they say are over franchise commitments, Chester/Wrexham/Salop are the latest example of BH cuts since May. Plus the latest Timetable fiasco. Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: 6 Sep 2011
Location: Herts
Posts: 830
|
The Royal Welsh workings were originally funded by the SRA , and I believe rolled forward in the franchise agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: 14 Nov 2011
Location: Caerphilly
Posts: 709
|
ATW wont do anything over and above their franchise. New Years Day on the Cardifff Valleys is a typical example. All other ATW routes have a service even Ebbw Vale which runs just over the other side of the hill from the Rhymney line. This is historical and goes back to the late 80s when New Years Day travel was not in such high demand as now and the services were withdrawn. On privatisation the Cardiff Valleys became a the Cardiff Valley TOC and subsequently the non requirement was not carried forward to ATW. Despite complaints every year from many areas, ATW will not budge. This is to highlight the fact ATW will not do anything over and above their franchise commitments. The DFT are not going to take any initiative to remedy so the only solution for an increased service on the HOW is for somebody to come forward and pay for it.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||||
|
I am the passenger...
Established Member
Join Date: 16 Dec 2008
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 11,524
|
Firstly, forget about any cascade of DMUs after the Valley Line electrification. The Pacers will be withdrawn later this decade and the 150s on Valley Line services will replace other Pacers. I don't see any trains being "spare" for the HOWL.
Quote:
23,500 = roughly 65 passengers a day at the busiest intermediate HOWL station (spread over eight departures a day). The two next busiest stations (Llandovery and Knighton) have a combined passenger volume roughly equal to Llandridnod. There are plenty of stations with just a couple of thousand passengers a year (a couple of passengers a day?). Just to put the figures into perspective. Quote:
Quote:
Adding in a fifth service sounds great, but it's going to take one unit all day to provide a marginal increase of one service. But one extra unit could instead provide a clockface bi-hourly service between Knigton and Shrewsbury or something similar at the Swansea end of the route. Quote:
Having services starting/ending at Llandrindod looks appealing, as it saves the first train of the day having come all the way from Swansea/Shrewsbury. However it would mean a tiny outstation which would be expensive (with little room to cope with unit/staff unavailability). --- old post above --- --- new post below --- Quote:
But the Wales & Borders franchise requires the highest passenger subsidy in the UK (per mile) so most of the increases suggested on here are going to be unprofitable. Last edited by tbtc; 29th July 2012 at 19:47. Reason: Double post prevention system |
|||||
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: 2 Feb 2012
Posts: 152
|
Quote:
It goes without saying that the initiative for any extra services on the HOWL is not going to come from ATW but from the the WAG who have frequently made noises about service improvement on the line. The HOWL timetable has been unchanged since privatisation and the franchise requirement was 4 trains a day with provisos such as, if I remember rightly, a train to arrive in Salop before 9am. This, of course, results in the ridiculous 0430 departure from Swansea! However, we now have a sunday service which was WAG inspired and not a franchise requirement. I also seem to remember that when extra trains to Fishguard were first proposed there was also the usual protestations of "where's the stock going to come from?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
I am the passenger...
Established Member
Join Date: 16 Dec 2008
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 11,524
|
Quote:
Make it later than 04:36 and you get complaints at the Shrewsbury end about it arriving too late for workers (like your complaints about the 05:19 southbound service not getting into Swansea before 09:00). |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 26 Jun 2010
Location: Newtown Montgomeryshire
Posts: 1,066
|
Quote:
The BR Manager who cut it from 5 trains a day to 4 as a recession money saving measure in the early 90's later admitted 50% of the passenger traffic went as well. Sacrificing the number of through all length trains by 1 and running the early morning ecs moves to points (Llandrinod Wells/Llandovery) where they can turn around in order to arrive into Swansea/Shrewsbury in the morning peak may make more sense in increasing usage though the psychological barrier of 3 trains a day between Llandovery and Llandrinod will have to be overcome. There is no bus service that straddles the Carmathenshire/Powys border the HoW being the only public transport on this axis. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: 2 Feb 2012
Posts: 152
|
Quote:
--- old post above --- --- new post below --- Quote:
Yes, agree that some short workings could make sense but don't think reducing to 3 plus 1 short working would ever gain much support but I believe that 4 thru' plus one short could work quite well. However, the Heart of Wales line Forum and HOWLTA have always seemed to be totally opposed to any short workings! Last edited by swcovas; 29th July 2012 at 20:53. Reason: Double post prevention system |
||
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
I am the passenger...
Established Member
Join Date: 16 Dec 2008
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 11,524
|
Quote:
Adding an extra round trip will require an extra unit even if it only makes one trip (since it'll take over eight hours after "break" time, so it's not like finding a unit with a spare couple of hours). The reality is that we are talking about a line with low passenger numbers, other than some busy weekend summer trains. It's a line that is politically sensitive but most trains are pretty empty (with a significant number of passengers being pensioners on free passes). |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|