![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: 20 Jul 2012
Location: wigan
Posts: 37
|
hi everyone
its my first post on here so hello,just a question on how easy or costly do you think it would be to install doo on different networks,would it be for instance easy on merseyrail and difficult on say arriva wales,i have a vested intrest as im a conductor but without getting into all the polotics of the matter how long in your opinions does the grade have left. would new stock be needed,station upgrades be done etc. |
|
|
| Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Join Date: 24 Mar 2011
Posts: 347
|
Won't happen. People like to see staff on trains. What happens when things go wrong?
There's a possibility on short distance regional routes but not after that. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
SWT Guard
Member
Join Date: 12 Jun 2012
Posts: 634
|
Quote:
Can't speak for other TOCs, but some seem to love it others hate it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: 1 Mar 2012
Posts: 718
|
To be honest, I think DOO would be preferred by some but any move to introduce any more would result in strong action against it by the RMT.
I'm not a fan of DOO as I feel that the DOO routes should be converted to the SPT model and have a driver responsible for the train and a ticket examiner responsible for checking and selling tickets. This is better as it improves visibility of on-board staff to the passengers and also means that in times of disruption, there's a second member of staff rather then the solo member of staff being left to fend for themselves. Routes which have guards on them should be left alone to potter on. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 5 Nov 2010
Location: Eastbourne
Posts: 1,494
|
Most of the DOO routes in the South work and i cant see it being expanded on. Only route that i think needs guards is Thameslink, although having guards would cost a hell of a lot.
__________________
TOCs Used in 2013 - CH, FC, GA, SE, SN, VT Classes travelled on in 2013 - 168, 171, 313, 319, 375, 377, 390, 90/MK3 |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: 18 Jun 2012
Location: South Wales
Posts: 29
|
I think it will come in sooner rather than later. It has certainly been discussed a lot at work. They won't get rid of guards, they will be 'downgraded' to ticket examiners but will no longer be safety critical positions. Arriva's Sprinters and Pacers already have the buttons in cabs to arm the doors so that won't be a problem. I for one would be against such moves, I enjoy working with guards and believe they are vital for the safe running of the railway. I would happily turn down a large pay rise to go DOO, I would rather things stay as they are.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 18 Apr 2011
Location: 52.479°N 1.893°W
Posts: 1,368
|
It will happen eventually, all new stock appears to be suitable for DOO work.
GSM-R being implemented nationally removes some safety reasons for having a guard on board. The McNulty report is pushing for it. As for where and when it will happen? Well, how long is a piece of string? It will be a long time before we see another line go DOO though, I'd think even if plans to make one were announced completely out of the blue tomorrow then it would be years before the first DOO train ran along it. Most, if not all guards roles have got decades left in them in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: 28 Jan 2007
Location: Kent
Posts: 152
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: 12 Mar 2008
Location: Cardenden, Fife
Posts: 879
|
Merseyrail have assured me there are no plans, even with the new stock, to introduce DOO.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 4 Jan 2010
Location: North Britain
Posts: 2,496
|
Paisley Canal line going DOO on completion of electrification , this December or thereabouts, already been agreed with RMT. Compensation to Guards is 5 extra services a day between Central and Edinburgh(North Berwick?) making it more or less an hourly service until, I assume 1514? I'd expect the rest of the remaining Strathclyde suburban routes to follow, whenever they're wired up.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Driver Instructor
Member
Join Date: 28 Dec 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 919
|
DOO is only widely supported by the bean counters and fare dodgers.
__________________
All opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of my employer. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Fares Advisor
Administrator
Join Date: 6 Jun 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 20,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 4 Jan 2010
Location: North Britain
Posts: 2,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: 16 Nov 2009
Location: Redcar
Posts: 8,856
|
Depends on how it's implemented. If it's purely DOO with no on train staff apart from the odd RPI check then I would not support it (apart from high intensity metro style operations). If it's DOO but retaining a ticket examiner who is purely responsible for selling tickets and customer service then I wouldn't really have a problem with it.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 4 Aug 2009
Location: Exeter
Posts: 3,950
|
I could see DOO on some self contained branches*. In Switzerland the line between Meiringen and Innertkirchen is DOO, at stations the driver collects fares at the door to the railcar as passengers board.
Out of interest what is the difference between a guard and ticket collector? Maybe have the TC trained in emergency procedures much like air stewards? *I'm thinking Liskeard to Looe or similar lines which see a single 153 and are isolated from the mainline.
__________________
My Rail and Aviation Videos | My Flight Diary Classes Travelled in 2012: 143, 150, 318, 411, 481, 7300, A319, F70, Subway |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|