RailUK Forums
RailUK Forums > Other Rail & Transport > Other Public Transport


Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 19th July 2010, 21:37   #8701
rosswatson
Vrrrrooooomage.
Member
 
rosswatson's Avatar
 
Join Date: 4 Mar 2009
Location: Workington... Yay.
Posts: 661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cumberland Lad View Post
I'm sure there's worse at LL already!
Yeah, the arse ends of the R---NBV's! I'm told 16652 is a chassis victim..
__________________
My Flickr 'stream... www.flickr.com/photos/transliner
rosswatson is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today!
Unread 19th July 2010, 21:45   #8702
Cumberland Lad
Member
 
Join Date: 11 Jun 2010
Posts: 237
Angry

.........................

Last edited by Cumberland Lad; 1st September 2010 at 18:47.
Cumberland Lad is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 19th July 2010, 21:49   #8703
rosswatson
Vrrrrooooomage.
Member
 
rosswatson's Avatar
 
Join Date: 4 Mar 2009
Location: Workington... Yay.
Posts: 661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cumberland Lad View Post
Oh FFS! That was the best one!!!
Noted that it's been missing from the 300 for a while now. It's been 16651/3/4 and either 16734 or 16447.
16654 seems very slow off the mark these days
__________________
My Flickr 'stream... www.flickr.com/photos/transliner
rosswatson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 19th July 2010, 21:52   #8704
Cumberland Lad
Member
 
Join Date: 11 Jun 2010
Posts: 237
Default

.............................

Last edited by Cumberland Lad; 1st September 2010 at 18:48.
Cumberland Lad is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 19th July 2010, 22:05   #8705
K777DAO
Long Live 20777!!!
Member
 
Join Date: 17 Jun 2009
Location: Netherton, Maryport, West Cumbria
Posts: 388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cumberland Lad View Post
Not as slow as 16653, dreadful bus! I've been off so I didn't know about 16652,
TBvH, Anything that has been roped in to LL to do 300/1's has been killed by the route iver a period of time, the 1665x's were decent when they first arrived from Chorley, and the P-VCK NCME examples were half decent when they first came too... It's going to take one hell of a solid drivetrain combo to tackle the route in terms of newer vehicles. AFAIK the only vehicles that really stood the test of time with that route were the K-DAO SWB Olympians!
__________________
FINALLY.... Captain Slow HAS COME BACK To The Forum!
K777DAO is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 19th July 2010, 22:16   #8706
Cumberland Lad
Member
 
Join Date: 11 Jun 2010
Posts: 237
Default

...........................

Last edited by Cumberland Lad; 1st September 2010 at 18:48.
Cumberland Lad is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 19th July 2010, 22:23   #8707
K777DAO
Long Live 20777!!!
Member
 
Join Date: 17 Jun 2009
Location: Netherton, Maryport, West Cumbria
Posts: 388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cumberland Lad View Post
The K reg Olympians were only on the 300's for a few years, they were replaced by the P reg N/C's that came from Ribble, which weren't here long, then came the R reg's, which have been on the 300's for at least 6 years, so they haven't done too bad really.
The K-DAOS were on from new though, and lasted a good 7 years until the VCK'S arrived... and 134 is still going fairly good to date... the Leylands were just that little bit better than the volvo replacements, but i suppose that is pure opinion!
__________________
FINALLY.... Captain Slow HAS COME BACK To The Forum!
K777DAO is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 19th July 2010, 22:27   #8708
Cumberland Lad
Member
 
Join Date: 11 Jun 2010
Posts: 237
Default

...................................

Last edited by Cumberland Lad; 1st September 2010 at 18:48.
Cumberland Lad is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 19th July 2010, 22:30   #8709
K777DAO
Long Live 20777!!!
Member
 
Join Date: 17 Jun 2009
Location: Netherton, Maryport, West Cumbria
Posts: 388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cumberland Lad View Post
14234 (or 1034 as it was) is still a very smooth bus, it just lacks power in comparison to how the Volvo's used to be. I would think that the Scania's will be around for along time, they are supposed to be very good.
TBH, i still know the deckers by the 10xx numbers!! haha (as Cainebj will vouch.. - i used to confuse him!) Shows my age! the scanias are supposed to be good, but a lot have been delivered with issues as of late i believe... i just hope these issues have been ironed out of lillyhall's!!
__________________
FINALLY.... Captain Slow HAS COME BACK To The Forum!
K777DAO is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th July 2010, 07:39   #8710
Mattdw92
in SC NW and NE regions
Member
 
Mattdw92's Avatar
 
Join Date: 14 Jun 2010
Location: Workington, North West/Newcastle Upon Tyne, North East
Posts: 639
Default

47006 on 51 and 20130 on 50 with 'Moorclo' only on its display
Off on hols for 10 days
__________________

My Flickr Photostream: for both North West and North East Bus and Coach Photos.
Mattdw92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th July 2010, 11:23   #8711
Pricey2701@gma
Member
 
Join Date: 28 Jun 2010
Posts: 109
Default

Are they going to brand the west cumbria scanias as they are not with the morecambe ones probably because on sundays they may run on the 2A or the 42
Pricey2701@gma is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th July 2010, 13:28   #8712
cainebj
Established Member
 
cainebj's Avatar
 
Join Date: 1 Nov 2008
Location: West Cumbria most of the time, also Carlisle
Posts: 2,529
Default

34616 on Seaton.
47059 and 47062 on Harrington. 47059 STILL sounding like a dog yelping.
35248, 20923 and 14255 on 30 and 31.
16447 been on annexe after 600.
20918 on 48 this afternoon.
20473 Staff Shuttle.
__________________
my Flickr photostream
cainebj is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th July 2010, 14:31   #8713
jonesy3001
Established Member
 
jonesy3001's Avatar
 
Join Date: 13 Jul 2009
Location: Morecambe
Posts: 1,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pricey2701@gma View Post
Are they going to brand the west cumbria scanias as they are not with the morecambe ones probably because on sundays they may run on the 2A or the 42
Somebody made a mistake putting a scania on the 2a's.
I wonder if the R-NBV's will end up like this
http://www.railforums.co.uk/attachme...1&d=1279636662
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0005.jpg (114.8 KB, 31 views)

Last edited by jonesy3001; 20th July 2010 at 14:38.
jonesy3001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th July 2010, 15:15   #8714
cainebj
Established Member
 
cainebj's Avatar
 
Join Date: 1 Nov 2008
Location: West Cumbria most of the time, also Carlisle
Posts: 2,529
Default

the 1545 50 was missed out. 20130 sat on the annexe, leaving everyone to cram onto 47006 on the 1600 51!
47617 is the other bus on Seaton.
20195, 20902, 20923 and 16647 on 30 and 31!
14257 done a catch up Moorclose Circular.
20919 flying around Staff Shuttle.
20921 on short 300.
16734 on full 300. i'm told 16651/3/4 are the others.
20913 on 53.

traffic has been rather ridiculously bad in Workington. various buses on 30 and 31 have been running late, and 1 driver decided to run his bus earlier than timetabled!
__________________
my Flickr photostream
cainebj is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th July 2010, 19:49   #8715
K777DAO
Long Live 20777!!!
Member
 
Join Date: 17 Jun 2009
Location: Netherton, Maryport, West Cumbria
Posts: 388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cainebj View Post
16734 on full 300. i'm told 16651/3/4 are the others.
all present and correct! I spent the afternoon in Carlisle, and spotted all four!
Usual Flurry of Darts and E300's flying around!
20977 on CE's mid afternoon 600 run

I followed 16651 home as far as Wigton... surprising turn of speed!!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonesy3001 View Post
Somebody made a mistake putting a scania on the 2a's.
I wonder if the R-NBV's will end up like this
http://www.railforums.co.uk/attachme...1&d=1279636662
What a shame... 16655 was LL's best during her time here!
__________________
FINALLY.... Captain Slow HAS COME BACK To The Forum!

Last edited by K777DAO; 20th July 2010 at 19:53. Reason: Double post prevention system
K777DAO is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
bus, fleet movements, fleetlist, lancaster, lillyhall, preston bus, scnw, stagecoach north west

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:12.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© RailUK Forums 2005 - the year after 2012