[Pumbaa]

It shouldn't be a problem. I often start/end short on AP tickets, and have never had an issue. If TIs/Guards recognise what I've done (less than half of the time), they usually chuckle and agree what a farce the system is, or in one case inform me that I should be made to purchase the full fare from where I boarded to my destination, but he wasn't going to do that as he had a hangover and couldn't face anything completely unnecessary.

[MikeWh]

As has been mentioned, the rules say you must travel on the exact train for the whole duration with an advance ticket. You don't give much info as to why you don't know whether you'll be at Flint or Prestatyn on the day. Is it really that there are no advances from Flint so you want to use the cheap fare from Prestatyn instead? If this is the case, is it out of the question to arrive at Flint an hour earlier and travel back to Prestatyn? It sounds mad, but would certainly be legal.

You might well be ok. If Flint has no barriers and the guard hasn't checked tickets between Prestatyn and Flint then it'll be ok. But you won't know all this for sure.

Originally Posted by tony_mac

So I should sit in the station and wait for 90 minutes for the next connection instead of walking for 15 minutes to my destination?

I don't think that anybody (else) would think that is reasonable!

Would you buy a ticket with a 90 minute wait for a leg of the journey you could finish on foot in 15 minutes? If a delay or cancellation meant that a connection was missed then you would undoubtedly be allowed to leave because the rail industry hadn't kept to it's side of the contract.

[tony_mac]

I find it hard to believe that when purchasing an advance ticket online that the restriction was not clearly stated.

Why don't you actually try a few different websites and see? And by clearly stated, I mean something that you are directed to read, with a link, or have to read to buy a ticket.

If you'd rather do that then buy an appropriate ticket, that's your perogative.

IF the incoming train is late and misses the connection, then according to the 'terms and conditions' I have to sit there and wait. But then I can claim a full refund on my ticket, so it's not exactly good for the railway either.

I have sometimes bought a ticket to my local station, and if I miss the first connection, or it is delayed, or it is too full, or if it is raining, then I leave and get the bus the rest of the way.
I don't see that harms the railway in any way, but obviously I should be grabbed at the station exit and charged for a new ticket. (if you are incapable of applying common sense).

[4SRKT]

Originally Posted by MikeWh

As has been mentioned, the rules say you must travel on the exact train for the whole duration with an advance ticket. You don't give much info as to why you don't know whether you'll be at Flint or Prestatyn on the day. Is it really that there are no advances from Flint so you want to use the cheap fare from Prestatyn instead? If this is the case, is it out of the question to arrive at Flint an hour earlier and travel back to Prestatyn? It sounds mad, but would certainly be legal.

You might well be ok. If Flint has no barriers and the guard hasn't checked tickets between Prestatyn and Flint then it'll be ok. But you won't know all this for sure.


Would you buy a ticket with a 90 minute wait for a leg of the journey you could finish on foot in 15 minutes? If a delay or cancellation meant that a connection was missed then you would undoubtedly be allowed to leave because the rail industry hadn't kept to it's side of the contract.

Basically I'll be in North Wales, travelling about a bit with a friend by car, but am not sure whether I'll end up nearer Flint or Prestatyn. An advance would be appropriate since the train I would use is the last train with a connection at Leeds into a Skipton line train (19:18 off Prestatyn, 19:31 Flint). I thought, sensibly enough, that buying a Prestatyn > Shipley ticket would cover both eventualities, but clearly although the rules are 'clearly stipulated' they appear to be insane and have been thought up by someone with a diseased brain.

I had a similar problem with travelling to and from Wrexham recently with some greedy git trying to charge me over £28. I gave a hollow laugh at the very idea of this and just drove instead. Sounds like I'll do the same again, and I reckon most normals would also do the same. Meanwhile the 175 on the 18:44 Llandudno > Manchester Airport rattles along saving fuel by having a few additional empty seats.

[RJ]

Originally Posted by 4SRKT

Basically I'll be in North Wales, travelling about a bit with a friend by car, but am not sure whether I'll end up nearer Flint or Prestatyn.

So the advance ticket is not suitable for your requirements, why buy it? You're going on like it's impossible to purchase a standard ticket which gives you more flexibility. The problem does not lie with the strict T&Cs of the Advance, it's with you not wanting to pay for an appropriate ticket. I've used Advance tickets countless times and there's nothing wrong with them if you actually know what your travelling plans will be.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---

Originally Posted by tony_mac

Why don't you actually try a few different websites and see? And by clearly stated, I mean something that you are directed to read, with a link, or have to read to buy a ticket.


IF the incoming train is late and misses the connection, then according to the 'terms and conditions' I have to sit there and wait. But then I can claim a full refund on my ticket, so it's not exactly good for the railway either.

I have sometimes bought a ticket to my local station, and if I miss the first connection, or it is delayed, or it is too full, or if it is raining, then I leave and get the bus the rest of the way.
I don't see that harms the railway in any way, but obviously I should be grabbed at the station exit and charged for a new ticket. (if you are incapable of applying common sense).

Like I said I've used advance tickets numerous times without a problem. The problem is people here attempting to exploit loopholes that don't actually exist then complaining about how stupid the system is.

[4SRKT]

Originally Posted by RJ

So the advance ticket is not suitable for your requirements, why buy it? You're going on like it's impossible to purchase a standard ticket which gives you more flexibility. The problem does not lie with the strict T&Cs of the Advance, it's with you not wanting to pay for an appropriate ticket. I've used Advance tickets countless times and there's nothing wrong with them if you actually know what your travelling plans will be.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---


Like I said I've used advance tickets numerous times without a problem. The problem is people here attempting to exploit loopholes that don't actually exist then complaining about how stupid the system is.

Bully for you; so have I used advance tickets many times without issue. I won't use it this time because it is stupid and irrational that a ticket from Flint costs more than a ticket from Prestatyn. I will drive instead. Great; that's £16 less for ATW, but that's fine by you because that's 'the rules' which are apparantly beyond question. Simply understanding a bad system it doesn't change its stupidity, and it's perfectly reasonable on a forum to accept rules at the same time as pointing out their stupidity.

You also need to think very carefully before you go around libelling people by accusing them of dishonesty.

[bignosemac]

Originally Posted by 4SRKT

Bully for you; so have I used advance tickets many times without issue. I won't use it this time because it is stupid and irrational that a ticket from Flint costs more than a ticket from Prestatyn. I will drive instead. Great; that's £16 less for ATW, but that's fine by you because that's 'the rules' which are apparantly beyond question. Simply understanding a bad system it doesn't change its stupidity, and it's perfectly reasonable on a forum to accept rules at the same time as pointing out their stupidity.

You also need to think very carefully before you go around libelling people by accusing them of dishonesty.

And bully for you! Yet another example of someone cutting off there nose to spite their face. Good luck getting from North Wales to Shipley for £16 using the car.

[4SRKT]

Originally Posted by bignosemac

And bully for you! Yet another example of someone cutting off there nose to spite their face. Good luck getting from North Wales to Shipley for £16 using the car.

Well, it isn't going to be £16 is it, because I can't use the £16 ticket from Flint. If I could I wouldn't drive. As it is, I'll spend a lot less in the car than the standard anytime single. In any case in my company car at 11p per mile, the 91 miles from Flint to Shipley will cost almost exactly £10 in diesel, and take only slightly more than half the time.

So in fact I'm being charitable to ATW by being willing to pay as much as £16, which I would gladly do as I prefer to travel by train. However I don't have 'mug' written across my forehead, and I will make the rational choice in this case.

Do try to keep up, there's a good chap, and if you can't manage it, don't post.

[yorksrob]

The stipulation that passengers are not allowed to join or leave a journey at a later or earlier stop on a journey for which the passenger has already paid is clearly nonsense and the railway does itself no favours in persisting with it. Ultimately it is without common sense because buying a ticket and not taking up part of the journey is no different from buying a ticket and not taking up any part of the journey. The railway has still got it's money for that journey.

[bignosemac]

Okay, I don't know who pays all the ancilliary costs with your car so it may only be £10 out of your pocket, but the real cost of the trip is still greater than even the Anytime Single from Prestatyn to Shipley, before even considering the mutlitude split ticket opportunities.

Oh and I was keeping up, but I wasn't ahead of you because I ain't bleedin' psychic - no idea you had a company car which could make the overall cost to you cheaper than the rail fare.

[4SRKT]

Originally Posted by bignosemac

Okay, I don't know who pays all the ancilliary costs with your car so it may only be £10 out of your pocket, but the real cost of the trip is still greater than even the Anytime Single from Prestatyn to Shipley, before even considering the mutlitude split ticket opportunities.

Oh and I was keeping up, but I wasn't ahead of you because I ain't bleedin' psychic - no idea you had a company car which could make the overall cost to you cheaper than the rail fare.

No fair enough, I was a bit out of order. Sorry

Splitting at Huddersfield will make it a bit cheaper, but certainly not less than £16.

[RJ]

Originally Posted by 4SRKT

Bully for you; so have I used advance tickets many times without issue. I won't use it this time because it is stupid and irrational that a ticket from Flint costs more than a ticket from Prestatyn. I will drive instead. Great; that's £16 less for ATW, but that's fine by you because that's 'the rules' which are apparantly beyond question. Simply understanding a bad system it doesn't change its stupidity, and it's perfectly reasonable on a forum to accept rules at the same time as pointing out their stupidity.

You also need to think very carefully before you go around libelling people by accusing them of dishonesty.

This thread is essentially a thinly veiled grievance at the price of a standard ticket is it not? Rather pointless.

[4SRKT]

Originally Posted by RJ

This thread is essentially a thinly veiled grievance at the price of a standard ticket is it not? Rather pointless.

Not really. It was merely asking a simple question if a certain ticket type from Prestatyn to Shipley (or anywhere else) could be used to start at Flint, something I genuinely did not know the answer to. Apparently it's not allowed, so I won't use it. I won't pay the larcenous price for the single, so I'll drive. It's a shame, but ultimately inevitable and I'm sure I can't be the only person who's come to this simple arithmetic conclusion.

I suppose all threads started by you are lofty and erudite and only deal with matters of the greatest and gravest significance?

[furryfeet]

Originally Posted by RJ

grievance at the price of a standard ticket

it neatly exposes what the railways are up against - i.e. far cheaper to travel by a company car.

By persisting with these silly rules, as well as the high prices for walk on fares, then the railways are never going to persuade people out of their company cars and on to public transport.

[142094]

There may be the case for people moving to public transport in the next few ways not due to the attractiveness of trains/buses etc but due to the price of running a car going even higher. I don't see petrol prices going below the £1 mark ever again and if plans for charging people to park at work are implemented we might see higher demand for public transport.