RailUK Forums
RailUK Forums > UK Railway Forums > UK Railway Discussion


Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Unread 3rd November 2010, 04:55   #1
WatcherZero
Established Member
 
Join Date: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 4,090
Default Accident, Wigan Wallgate

Quote:


A PASSENGER had a miraculous escape after falling under a moving train.

Late night travellers screamed in terror as the man lost his footing as he approached the Manchester Airport to Southport DMU train, as it slowed to a stop in Wigan Wallgate station.

He slid down the side of the train and then through the gap between the carriage and the platform edge, disappearing beneath the train.

Railway authorities closed the line to rail traffic to allow firemen to undertake a complicated half-hour long rescue.

Astonishingly, the victim suffered little more than minor cuts to his neck, bruises and mild shock in the incident.

Emergency services confirmed that he appeared to be intoxicated.

Train services were disrupted for more than half an hour before the line was reopened just after midnight on Friday.

Today, rail infrastructure company Network Rail was again examining the Southport-bound platforms of the station to make sure the track had not been slewed out at that point, creating a bigger gap between train and platform than regulations allow.

That concern has already been raised with the authorities by retired train driver Coun John Hilton, who is concerned about the safety of passengers.

He said: “There is a long-standing problem with the shape of the platform, which means the track has to be pushed out so that the front of the incoming train doesn’t catch, and it definitely needs sorting.”

The passenger, who was about 35 years old, has not been named.

But a spokesman for Network Rail said: “It is important to point out that gaps between trains and platforms at stations are a safety necessity in their own right.

“Industry standards and guidance recommend what the maximum clearances between platforms and the footplates on passenger trains should be and Network Rail applies those standards at all stations. Passengers falling between trains and platforms is a very rare occurrence.”

http://www.wigantoday.net/news/miracle_escape_1_2725696
I have been complaining about the platform gap at my daily station for years, because its on a corner the gap between train and platform is 1.5-2ft wide and over a foot and a half high, a lot of passengers have to jump because the gap is too tall and wide to step down.
WatcherZero is offline  
Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today!
Unread 3rd November 2010, 08:06   #2
blacknight
Ramp Tramp
Member
 
blacknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: 19 Feb 2009
Location: Crow Park
Posts: 542
Default

Maybe next time passenger will wait for the train to come to a stand before moving attempting to board.
blacknight is offline  
Unread 3rd November 2010, 08:19   #3
trainophile
Member
 
Join Date: 28 Oct 2010
Posts: 891
Default

Quote:
the gap between train and platform is 1.5-2ft wide and over a foot and a half high
I've got off that service there and never noticed a huge gap, so is it only at one part of the platform?

If it really is that wide and high, how on earth do people with luggage, buggies, or the elderly manage to get ON the train?

It does sound like the bloke was the cause of his own fate on this occasion. Isn't that why there's a "do not cross" line painted on the platform a couple of feet back from the edge?
trainophile is offline  
Unread 3rd November 2010, 08:32   #4
sprinterguy
Travelling Pass
Established Member
 
sprinterguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 4 Mar 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 5,488
Default

The yellow lines are only painted on platforms that have high speed non-stop trains passing through, with the resulting air turbulence that these cause.

From the report, it seems that it is an over eager passenger making his way towards the train before it has stopped that is the problem, more than the actual gap between the platform and train itself.

Looking at the photo of the 156, it seems that the track is canted through the platform, which would be why there is such a difference in height. Reducing the width of the gap would require a realigning of the curve and platform to give a gentler radius, which would be fairly disruptive.
sprinterguy is offline  
Unread 3rd November 2010, 09:09   #5
The Barlow Boy
Member
 
Join Date: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 614
Default

If you want to see a gap try platform two at East Croydon or platform seven and eight at Clapham Junction. Low platforms, curves, track canted. I've seen people miss trains because they couldn't clamber up.
The Barlow Boy is offline  
Unread 3rd November 2010, 09:09   #6
jopsuk
Established Member
 
Join Date: 13 May 2008
Posts: 6,243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sprinterguy View Post
The yellow lines are only painted on platforms that have high speed non-stop trains passing through, with the resulting air turbulence that these cause.
No they're not- they are required at those locations, but there are many terminals and/or platforms with only stopping services that have been attacked with yellow paint throughout the country.

It's clear the key factor here- that the guy was ****ed and unable to control himself properly. Might actually have helped reduce the damage from the fall though!

Edit: also, gotta love the up-to-date photo- are there in fact yellow lines at this location these days?
jopsuk is offline  
Unread 3rd November 2010, 09:19   #7
sprinterguy
Travelling Pass
Established Member
 
sprinterguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 4 Mar 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 5,488
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jopsuk View Post
No they're not- they are required at those locations, but there are many terminals and/or platforms with only stopping services that have been attacked with yellow paint throughout the country.
Ah fair enough: Are yellow lines at such locations as terminal stations an optional preference then, or is there any sort of requirement at certain locations that only have stopping services? Now that I think of it, I have come across yellow lines on stations like that.
sprinterguy is offline  
Unread 3rd November 2010, 09:33   #8
Peter Mugridge
Established Member
 
Peter Mugridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: 8 Apr 2010
Location: Epsom
Posts: 3,515
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Barlow Boy View Post
If you want to see a gap try platform two at East Croydon or platform seven and eight at Clapham Junction. Low platforms, curves, track canted. I've seen people miss trains because they couldn't clamber up.

Try platform 4 at Epsom, roughly where the 4th car of any train will be...
Peter Mugridge is offline  
Unread 3rd November 2010, 10:11   #9
Kernowfem
Member
 
Kernowfem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 24 Oct 2009
Location: sheffield, south yorkshire.
Posts: 613
Default

"Emergency serives confirmed he appeared to be intoxicated" Maybe next time he shouldn't try to board the train drunk...

"Falling under a moving train" ?????? Surely he didnt try to board it before it stopped?

Both of the above hint towards the passenger being at fault as apposed to the platform.

Any more documented accidents about this particular platform, or just this one??
Kernowfem is offline  
Unread 3rd November 2010, 10:14   #10
Mintona
Train Driver
Established Member
 
Join Date: 8 Jan 2006
Location: Gillingham, Kent
Posts: 2,276
Default

377 on the down at Selhurst, I'm 6ft4in and I struggled to climb onto that.
Mintona is offline  
Unread 3rd November 2010, 11:29   #11
- Cal -
Member
 
Join Date: 22 Oct 2009
Posts: 43
Default

it was his own fault, trying to enter a train while it was still moving and the article says he was intoxicated, not a bad gap at wallgate, try platform 3 at earlstown or the drop at flixton
- Cal - is offline  
Unread 3rd November 2010, 13:55   #12
175001
Member
 
175001's Avatar
 
Join Date: 3 Feb 2007
Location: Usually between Ordsall Lane Jct and Earlestown East Jct
Posts: 662
Default

I work through Wallgate on a daily basis from Vic, and yes the gap is apparent when you step off. I've been on leave this past 2 weeks so missed all the news at work about it!
__________________
Northern Guard
175001 is offline  
Unread 3rd November 2010, 14:22   #13
WatcherZero
Established Member
 
Join Date: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 4,090
Default

There was a yellow line alongside a shallow drainage gutter. You can see the line of concrete where they filled it in.
WatcherZero is offline  
Unread 3rd November 2010, 16:23   #14
Neilandrewhall
Banned
 
Join Date: 8 Sep 2010
Location: Hornchurch
Posts: 270
Default

when was this? as the pictures look's REALLY old lol. As it isn't Northern Rail Lively?
Neilandrewhall is offline  
Unread 3rd November 2010, 16:29   #15
Eric
Member
 
Eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: 21 Oct 2010
Posts: 166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neilandrewhall View Post
when was this? as the pictures look's REALLY old lol. As it isn't Northern Rail Lively?
It looks around 2005/2006
Eric is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:58.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© RailUK Forums 2005 - the year after 2012