RailUK Forums
RailUK Forums > UK Railway Forums > Infrastructure & Stations
Unread 17th May 2011, 21:20   #1
Sox
Member
 
Join Date: 22 Oct 2010
Posts: 87
Default Todmorden Curve

http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk...nning_by_2013/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Moseley in Lancashire Telegraph
Todmorden Curve could be running by 2013

FASTER trains could be running between Burnley and Manchester as soon as December 2013 after engineers gave their seal of approval to the project.

Network Rail has completed a detailed assessment into whether the vital Todmorden Curve link could be reinstated.

Its engineers say the project, which would cost between £7.5million and £8million, is feasible, despite complications over the exact route. This means the only obstacle now is finding the cash.

Keith Lumley, of Network Rail, said: “It is good news. We are saying it can be done. From an engineering and railway point of view there is nothing to stop it being done.”

The company’s verdict is a major step forward for the project, which council bosses have made their top rail priority in Lancashire.

The 500-metre stretch of track known as the Todmorden Curve, which has not been used since the 1960s, connects the Burnley to Manchester lines and would cut the travel time to 40 minutes. Commuters currently have to change at Hebden Bridge.

A single line has been recommended, although it cannot follow the original path because the curve would be too sharp.

Mr Lumley said the engineers had ‘tinkered’ with the route and put forward an alternative.

The project has now completed the first three of eight stages, and the onus on Burnley and Lancashire council chiefs is now to bid for money and submit a final business case to the government.

If cash can be found by early next year, a detailed engineering stage will begin. The link could then be built, handed back to the rail industry, and begin operating by the end of 2013.

Lancashire County Council’s transport chief, Tim Ashton, said: “Out of seven schemes related to rail in Lancashire, this is our top one. I am fully supportive of it.”
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today!
Unread 18th May 2011, 06:37   #2
Paul Sidorczuk
Xenophon philosopher
Established Member
 
Paul Sidorczuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 17 Apr 2011
Location: Extremely posh, even by Cheshire standards (Better than Alderley Edge or Wilmslow)
Posts: 8,526
Default

After the demise of the Manchester to Accrington direct route (now part ELR), this link would give that part of North Lancashire a faster link to Manchester than the line through Blackburn and Bolton. It would give more emphasis on the Manchester to Todmorden part of the Calder Valley route.

I note that it is stated that the original line path cannot be followed because the curve would be too sharp and that only a single line is envisaged. Have any suggested path proposals been yet put into the public domain?
__________________
"A cynic, when he smells flowers, looks around for a coffin" -H.L.Mencken.
Sent from my stone monolith using cuneiform and runic symbols.
Paul Sidorczuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 18th May 2011, 08:45   #3
cle
Member
 
Join Date: 17 Nov 2010
Posts: 759
Default

Single line is better than nothing. It would probably only need 4tph to use it - 2tph each way I would guess. Manchester - Tod might become quite high frequency!

They could run as circular services (up round Bolton and Blackburn then down again) to avoid clogging Victoria. Clitheroe services could be additional, and maybe run semi-fast (with a view to extending to Hellifield).
cle is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 18th May 2011, 09:01   #4
Invincibles
Member
 
Join Date: 12 Jul 2009
Location: Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
Posts: 495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cle View Post
Single line is better than nothing. It would probably only need 4tph to use it - 2tph each way I would guess. Manchester - Tod might become quite high frequency!

They could run as circular services (up round Bolton and Blackburn then down again) to avoid clogging Victoria. Clitheroe services could be additional, and maybe run semi-fast (with a view to extending to Hellifield).
Be interesting to know what the demand for Bolton/Darwen to Burnley would be, because that would then become possible with a circular service.
Invincibles is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 18th May 2011, 09:48   #5
cle
Member
 
Join Date: 17 Nov 2010
Posts: 759
Default

It would probably exist, and Accrington too. They're both rubbish for shopping for example, and so people might want to go to Bolton which is better. Not to mention employment prospects.

The circular route would probably be used for lots of different, short journeys rather than long ones (Bolton to Tod would be unlikely for example) - but as such, might take a lot of people out of their cars and off buses.
cle is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th May 2011, 16:47   #6
Paul Sidorczuk
Xenophon philosopher
Established Member
 
Paul Sidorczuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 17 Apr 2011
Location: Extremely posh, even by Cheshire standards (Better than Alderley Edge or Wilmslow)
Posts: 8,526
Default

What are the views of both the Local Authorities named in this thread under the current economic climate and would Central Government view the case for strategic re-opening of the link with favour in the coming period of time?
__________________
"A cynic, when he smells flowers, looks around for a coffin" -H.L.Mencken.
Sent from my stone monolith using cuneiform and runic symbols.
Paul Sidorczuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th May 2011, 19:33   #7
bluenoxid
Established Member
 
Join Date: 9 Feb 2008
Posts: 1,301
Default

LCC are very supportive of it and I believe it is their main priority for rail investment.
bluenoxid is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th May 2011, 19:49   #8
Nym
MIET AMIMechE MIEEE(Soon)
Established Member
 
Nym's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2 Mar 2007
Location: In a tunnel, not in London...
Posts: 6,365
Default

Will be very nice to have aswell, I'm wondering if it will either be an extra tph on the loop with the Clitheroe service being kept, or if it will be incorparated into the current Clitheroe diagram.

It could divert one of the Wigan via Bolton services toward Blackburn and onto Clitheroe, but it would need more 2 tack between Bolton and Blackburn again IIRC
__________________
The views expressed above do not necessarily reflect those of my current, future or former employers, the IET, IMechE or InstMC.
Nym is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th May 2011, 19:56   #9
WatcherZero
Established Member
 
Join Date: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 4,093
Default

Lanashires priorities (and the chance of them happening) could probably be ordered:

1. Todmorden
2. ELR commuter service
3. Burscough Curve
4. Kirkby-Skem Merseyrail extension
5. New heritage rail
6. Skipton
WatcherZero is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th May 2011, 20:02   #10
185
"no, it's not valid"
Established Member
 
185's Avatar
 
Join Date: 29 Aug 2010
Location: In the aisle.
Posts: 2,169
Default

Always makes me giggle the figures quoted for streches of line 500metres long, or for example the Halton Curve points reinstatement. I bet the someone like the Llangollen Railway could put track in for about 5% of these stupid prices quoted
__________________
185 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th May 2011, 20:08   #11
Nym
MIET AMIMechE MIEEE(Soon)
Established Member
 
Nym's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2 Mar 2007
Location: In a tunnel, not in London...
Posts: 6,365
Default

Watcher, I get the distinct feeling that the only thing that would need to happen for a commuter service on the ELR, well, maybe two things, possibly three

If a mainline connection to Castleford is wanted, or onward travel into Victoria, would be if they have enough mainline registered stock, I'm not sure of the current situation of mainline reg stock at the ELR, but I don't think theres much.

Other than that

1) Drivers that can sign to Castleford?
2) If the DaFT would alow it
3) Funding

If the ELR joined ATOC as a ToC and had some of their drivers sign the routes into Victoria, or even just to Castleford, or even just into Bury, but all the way into Victoria would be nicer.

ELR as an open access TOC, able to set fares on their own route, and potentially joining the System One Travelcard system, or Metrolink's ticketing system, I can see an hourly or better service to Rawthenstall working.
__________________
The views expressed above do not necessarily reflect those of my current, future or former employers, the IET, IMechE or InstMC.
Nym is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th May 2011, 22:21   #12
WatcherZero
Established Member
 
Join Date: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 4,093
Default

To a couple of those questions, money is the big thing, probably around £20m needed possibly TFGM and LCC throwing some into the pot but would probably need a grant from somewhere to reach the right amount. The next biggest issue is legislation/licensing of the ELR for a passenger service, in particular if higher line speeds were desired. As to vehicles Whitmore was being given a guided tour of the Stourbridge Class 139 last week and told RAIL that we could be seeing them in Manchester very soon. A larger variant of the PPM50 would be what they would use I imagine, something like the PPM175. As to how far it would go im not sure, quite possibly it would start off only on the ELR track, possibly being extended to Victoria later but that would require track changes unless they decided to make the route on the existing connection to Metrolink through the ELR's depot.
WatcherZero is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th May 2011, 22:26   #13
Nym
MIET AMIMechE MIEEE(Soon)
Established Member
 
Nym's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2 Mar 2007
Location: In a tunnel, not in London...
Posts: 6,365
Default

Or it could be the case that these PPMs (The biggest ones available) could run on Metrolink inferstructure to Victoria...?

PPM to make a Tram/Train?
__________________
The views expressed above do not necessarily reflect those of my current, future or former employers, the IET, IMechE or InstMC.
Nym is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th May 2011, 22:39   #14
bluenoxid
Established Member
 
Join Date: 9 Feb 2008
Posts: 1,301
Default

Could be done a lot cheaper by connecting with the existing tram at Bury using a PPM or a train. Looking at other options, I was parked at Junction 2 of the M66 to pick up a phone call where the line crosses towards Castleton. A lot of brownfield area for parking with a simple platform.
bluenoxid is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 20th May 2011, 22:49   #15
WatcherZero
Established Member
 
Join Date: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 4,093
Default

If theres no infrastructure works this project could be done on the cheap, its if they need to start altering signalling, replacing track or laying new connections the cost will mount up.





Little video from before it entered service which I think is quite informative.

Last edited by WatcherZero; 20th May 2011 at 22:52. Reason: Double post prevention system
WatcherZero is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:56.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© RailUK Forums 2005 - the year after 2012