RailUK Forums
RailUK Forums > UK Railway Forums > UK Railway Discussion


Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Unread 19th April 2012, 14:20   #16
fgwrich
Established Member
 
fgwrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: 15 Apr 2009
Location: The North (Of The South) Of the Southern Great Western!
Posts: 2,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YorkshireBear View Post
See i was right thanks for that feel quite proud now as it was just a guess.

When are they expected in full service?
Whenever really - Shouldnt be too long now as a Spring start seems to be the most mentioned, so give or take a few weeks really - In short, it all depends on how many staff are trained up and how far the 180s are through the mods program.
fgwrich is offline  
Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today!
Unread 19th April 2012, 14:21   #17
Zoe
Established Member
 
Join Date: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 5,669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Failed Unit View Post
There are quite a few places that have IC stock that don't need it, Norwich is the other where an EMU with decent seating would be fine.
It could be argued that the London to Bristol doesn't need intercity stock though as it's largely a commuter route these days. I doubt that would be popular though.
Zoe is offline  
Unread 19th April 2012, 14:23   #18
calc7
InterCity
Established Member
 
calc7's Avatar
 
Join Date: 8 Aug 2011
Posts: 1,992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Failed Unit View Post
But what is wrong with Cambridge's service? It has a fast and frequent service to London, much better than Oxfords!

There are quite a few places that have IC stock that don't need it, Norwich is the other where an EMU with decent seating would be fine.
Agreed. Yes, Oxford is a nice, aspirational city but it's too close to London to justify HSTs being used on runs terminating there and it's hardly the "blue chip" area like the Fens. If it didn't have the uni surely it's just be another Swindon!
calc7 is offline  
Unread 19th April 2012, 14:25   #19
Failed Unit
Established Member
 
Join Date: 26 Jan 2009
Location: Central Belt
Posts: 3,937
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoe View Post
It could be argued that the London to Bristol doesn't need intercity stock though as it's largely a commuter route these days. I doubt that would be popular though.
Nope, good point maybe Bristol should get 395s, they are good enough for Margate services! 395s for Newark Stoppers!

Last edited by Failed Unit; 19th April 2012 at 14:34.
Failed Unit is offline  
Unread 19th April 2012, 14:30   #20
jopsuk
Established Member
 
Join Date: 13 May 2008
Posts: 6,236
Default

with Cambridge and IEP being brought up- stated seating capacity I can find for a 365 is 242- making the 12 car peak time services 726 seats. How many seats will a 2x5 car IEP have? The likes of the 0745 from Cambridge leave with more than 726 people on board...
jopsuk is offline  
Unread 19th April 2012, 16:20   #21
Schnellzug
le Petit Train Jaune
Established Member
 
Schnellzug's Avatar
 
Join Date: 22 Aug 2011
Location: Evercreech Junction
Posts: 2,926
Default

isn't that the point of a test run, to identify & iron out problems before they go into service? So it could be said that it's worked even though it didn't actually run. A kind of virtual test run, perhaps. :S
Schnellzug is offline  
Unread 19th April 2012, 16:28   #22
VTPreston_Tez
On Moderation
 
Join Date: 26 Jan 2012
Location: Preston
Posts: 1,049
Default

How about ordering some 185s? They have good acceleration and braking as well as 100mph top speed, they could be designed to be 5/6 car 185s with 125mph top speed? If not, then maybe modified 170s? I'm sure it would work but I don't know much about the GWML...
VTPreston_Tez is offline  
Unread 19th April 2012, 22:10   #23
MattE2010
The cry was No Surrender
Established Member
 
MattE2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: 16 May 2010
Location: North
Posts: 9,635
Default

Well bear in mind that 125mph trains need a crumple zone and you'll see why it may be quite complex to modify 170s or 185s for it - it would require a complete front end rebuild that I'm guessing wouldn't be possible on existing units. AFAIAC 180s are perfect for the Cotswolds route, I suspect their 125 is handy between Paddington and Oxford.
__________________
RIP Clive Burr
MattE2010 is offline  
Unread 19th April 2012, 22:29   #24
W-on-Sea
Member
 
Join Date: 18 Dec 2009
Posts: 697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calc7 View Post
If it didn't have the uni surely it's just be another Swindon!
Fighting words, there! If (and it is, admittedly, given their history, a very big if) they do prove reliable, the 180s will be great on the Cotswold Line - similar capacity to the Turbos (for all that they are longer trains), but much more comfortable and suited to the route.

As for HSTs from Oxford - there is definitely the demand for a train that can shift that number of people in the peaks, at least. While if anything at weekends (perhaps Sundays more than Saturdays) the train service from Oxford to London really isn't adequate to deal with the numbers, at some parts of the year, at least.
W-on-Sea is offline  
Unread 19th April 2012, 22:30   #25
TEW
Established Member
 
Join Date: 2 Jul 2010
Posts: 1,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schnellzug View Post
isn't that the point of a test run, to identify & iron out problems before they go into service? So it could be said that it's worked even though it didn't actually run. A kind of virtual test run, perhaps. :S
These aren't test runs though, they're crew training, so if the train is always broken crew training is going to take longer.
TEW is offline  
Unread 20th April 2012, 17:43   #26
Tiny Tim
Railway enthusiast
Member
 
Tiny Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: 6 Jan 2012
Location: Devizes, Wiltshire.
Posts: 401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VTPreston_Tez View Post
How about ordering some 185s? They have good acceleration and braking as well as 100mph top speed, they could be designed to be 5/6 car 185s with 125mph top speed? If not, then maybe modified 170s? I'm sure it would work but I don't know much about the GWML...
Nobody's going to be ordering new motive power for the soon-to-be-electrified GWML. That's why they're having to make do with hand-me-downs in the interim.
Tiny Tim is offline  
Unread 20th April 2012, 17:50   #27
sprinterguy
Travelling Pass
Established Member
 
sprinterguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 4 Mar 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 5,488
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jopsuk View Post
with Cambridge and IEP being brought up- stated seating capacity I can find for a 365 is 242- making the 12 car peak time services 726 seats. How many seats will a 2x5 car IEP have? The likes of the 0745 from Cambridge leave with more than 726 people on board...
500 standard class seats and 118 first class seats.
__________________
Most recent journeys:
07/05 LM 350113
10:50 Coventry - B'ham New Street
sprinterguy is offline  
Unread 20th April 2012, 18:03   #28
NSE
Member
 
NSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: 3 Mar 2010
Posts: 714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoe View Post
The door layout on the 395s would suggest they were not intended to be intercity trains. Cambridge will finally be getting an intercity service with the IEP, about 15 years after Oxford got its half-hourly intercity service to London.
I can safely say Cambridge does not need an intercity service. It would be overkill, off peak all is needed is maybe a couple of 8 car trains on the non-stop services. Even that wouldnt be vital at all, but would be welcome. Capacity is definatly needed in the peaks, but not new trains. Just longer 365s, the speed is fine as north of Hitchin line speed drops and the door layout makes them ideal for when they run semi fasts. I know there aren't any more 365's but we certainly don't need HST type trains, mostly because all trains terminate at Cambridge. It's only the Kings Lynn and the XC services that regularly run as through services off peak, and only a few GA to Kings Lynn.
__________________
I love the 377, there I said it
NSE is offline  
Unread 20th April 2012, 18:16   #29
boltonwanderer
Member
 
Join Date: 5 Sep 2011
Posts: 12
Default

I would certainly take the 180's back in my morning commute into Manchester without a doubt.Much more comfortable ride than the 142's or 150's that we have now - and people not left behind on the platform at Bolton!
boltonwanderer is offline  
Unread 20th April 2012, 18:28   #30
D1009
Member
 
Join Date: 22 Feb 2012
Posts: 736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jopsuk View Post
The likes of the 0745 from Cambridge leave with more than 726 people on board...
I would rather doubt that as it suggests that no-one joining at Royston gets a seat. Unless things have changed recently I heard there was plenty of room in the rear coaches of the 12 car formations.
D1009 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:35.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© RailUK Forums 2005 - the year after 2012