RailUK Forums
RailUK Forums > Other Forums > General Discussion


Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Unread 21st May 2012, 10:06   #16
Clip
Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: 28 Jun 2010
Posts: 2,946
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveNewcastle View Post
Do we really expect that the buyer will be paying £151,100.00 ?
I dont expect that at all.. Stupid people though in herit this earth Dave.

there was a woman on BBC breakfast who was a torch bearer and has put hers up for sale, she was mentioning how much abuse she had got for doing so even though that the money raised will be going to charity.. And lots of fake bids for hers too - £151K or something. She'll get nowhere near that seeing how one for the last time the Olympics was here went for just £3500 IIRC.
Clip is offline  
Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today!
Unread 21st May 2012, 10:09   #17
DaveNewcastle
admiring the bridges
Fares Advisor
 
DaveNewcastle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 21 Dec 2007
Location: Newcastle (unless I'm out)
Posts: 4,733
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nym View Post
They legally have to unless the seller agrees to a bid retraction.
Indeed, though that's not quite what I was asking!

The winning buyer appears to have been busy bidding recently, winning bids in Wedding Dresses, Hair Straighteners, Girls Clothing and Motorcycle Parts.

I'd not be surprised if they are unable and/or unwilling to pay (or if pursued, then settle at £5 per month which is then paid for the first few months before 'disappearing').
DaveNewcastle is offline  
Unread 21st May 2012, 10:55   #18
GB
Established Member
 
GB's Avatar
 
Join Date: 16 Nov 2008
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nym View Post
They legally have to unless the seller agrees to a bid retraction.
That means nothing these days tho. All that would happen is that the seller would open an unpaid item dispute and get refunded the selling and listing fee.

Ebay is not once what it used to be that is for sure.
GB is offline  
Unread 21st May 2012, 11:25   #19
SS4
3.14159265358979323846...
Established Member
 
SS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: 30 Jan 2011
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6,144
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nym View Post
They legally have to unless the seller agrees to a bid retraction.
Except ebay usually side with the buyer in all disputes regardless of who is in the rights as they'd rather lose a seller than a customer, especially a private seller instead of a business
__________________
Last Journey: 26/04/13 20:45 MYB - BMO (CR)
A new type of broom came out, it is sweeping the nation.
SS4 is offline  
Unread 21st May 2012, 14:30   #20
wintonian
Established Member
 
wintonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: 15 Jan 2010
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 4,889
Default

For comparison here is an £80,000 that makes it even clearer that it is a photo
__________________
-My blog: wintonian.net-
wintonian is offline  
Unread 21st May 2012, 14:52   #21
deltic1989
Napier Power!!!
Established Member
 
deltic1989's Avatar
 
Join Date: 21 Sep 2010
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 1,060
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GB View Post

Ebay is not once what it used to be that is for sure.
I agree with that there are too many wallies on there now that ruin it for the genuine buyers.

I have experience of fleabay from the buying and selling perspective and I have been messed about both ways, I won't go into details here but lets say the 3 year old excuse came up more than once.

Its got to the point now where I would rather advertise my wares on facebook and gumtree than risk getting burned on ebay, as the so called buyer and seller protection is a joke.

Having said that there are still a fair few honest ebayers out there and I have had the pleasure of dealing with a lot of them, one seller was so good that I bought 2 cars from him (allbeit 2 years apart). Its seems that there is a case of the few ruining it for the many, as with most things in modern life.
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.- Albert Einstein
deltic1989 is offline  
Unread 21st May 2012, 17:26   #22
trentside
Established Member
 
trentside's Avatar
 
Join Date: 14 Aug 2010
Posts: 1,932
Default

I moved to selling items on Amazon a few years ago, it's far more secure and the back-up offered by Amazon is excellent. You pay fees only when you sell and item too, so no fees re-listing if the item doesn't sell. Wouldn't touch eBay with a barge pole (as a seller) now, got burned once too often.
__________________
My Flickr Site | My FlightDiary
trentside is offline  
Unread 21st May 2012, 18:49   #23
All Line Rover
Established Member
 
Join Date: 17 Feb 2011
Posts: 3,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SS4 View Post
Except ebay usually side with the buyer in all disputes regardless of who is in the rights as they'd rather lose a seller than a customer, especially a private seller instead of a business
Totally true. eBay are so concerned with the $$$ that they are alienating their important sellers (i.e. those who don't just sell a few things from the attic now and then). They'll never create the professional image that Amazon has (for both buyers and sellers!).

With regard to the Olympic torches, if people are stupid enough to bid thousands on a picture, so be it. Congrats to the seller!
All Line Rover is offline  
Unread 21st May 2012, 18:57   #24
Ivo
Starmie
Established Member
 
Ivo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 8 Jan 2010
Location: Bath (or Southend)
Posts: 7,116
Default

Looking at some of those prices it's quite clear that there is some misleading going on...

Oh, and £75K for what may as well just be a signature?
__________________
Now Live: Ivo's Blog, AvonThameside!
Ivo is online now  
Unread 21st May 2012, 19:37   #25
142094
142 aficionado
Established Member
 
142094's Avatar
 
Join Date: 7 Nov 2009
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 7,748
Default

This happened with the 20ps that were minted incorrectly - some people 'sold' pictures of the 20ps, while some sold other 20ps that had been minted correctly, but the description was made to look like it was in fact from the other batch.
__________________
Stand Clear of the Doors, Please.
142094 is offline  
Unread 21st May 2012, 20:50   #26
XCDriver
Banned
 
Join Date: 26 Feb 2011
Location: Warwick
Posts: 2,169
Default

A fool and their money are easily parted
XCDriver is offline  
Unread 21st May 2012, 22:34   #27
Peter Mugridge
Established Member
 
Peter Mugridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: 8 Apr 2010
Location: Epsom
Posts: 3,604
Default

There are a large number of photos of the torch listed at £499.99 "buy it now" at the moment...
Peter Mugridge is offline  
Unread 21st May 2012, 22:35   #28
Nym
MIET AMIMechE MIEEE(Soon)
Established Member
 
Nym's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2 Mar 2007
Location: In a tunnel, not in London...
Posts: 6,415
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Mugridge View Post
There are a large number of photos of the torch listed at £499.99 "buy it now" at the moment...
Not guilty
__________________
The views expressed above do not necessarily reflect those of my current, future or former employers, the IET, IMechE or InstMC.
Nym is offline  
Unread 21st May 2012, 22:37   #29
TheJRB
Member
 
TheJRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: 14 Feb 2011
Location: Ashford, Kent
Posts: 659
Default

This one tickled me especially: This item is just a regular torch with a sticky note under it that reads "Olympics London 2012" currently bidding with a single bid at £150k with and yes, I don't think I'm going mad, it says £100 delivery too. Fear not, there are 6 days and 20 hours remaining...
__________________
All stations via Maidstone East
TheJRB is offline  
Unread 21st May 2012, 22:49   #30
Peter Mugridge
Established Member
 
Peter Mugridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: 8 Apr 2010
Location: Epsom
Posts: 3,604
Default

*facepalm cubed*
Peter Mugridge is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:05.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© RailUK Forums 2005 - the year after 2012