RailUK Forums
RailUK Forums > UK Railway Forums > UK Railway Discussion


Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Unread 26th May 2012, 19:37   #16
brianthegiant
Electrical Engineer
Member
 
brianthegiant's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12 May 2010
Posts: 426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tsr View Post
Let's hope that if you aren't doing anything illegal, you have nothing to fear from any guards.
I'm afraid the
'if you aren't doing anything illegal, you have nothing to fear'
argument doesn't wash with me.
Far too many Police mistakes over the years, including a few fatal ones involving armed police.
Mark Duggan and Jean Charles de Menezes for example.

but I suspect thats why you added the 'Let hope' qualifier
__________________
Do you want a better railway network for the UK? Say YES to HS2! www.YEStoHS2.co.uk
brianthegiant is offline  
Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today!
Unread 27th May 2012, 20:45   #17
neilmc
Member
 
Join Date: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 247
Default

So would this site be prohibited from publishing timings of such trains, or sightings of them - after all they will be in transit for some consierable time!
neilmc is offline  
Unread 27th May 2012, 20:52   #18
tsr
Speed of thought: ~15mph
Established Member
 
tsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: 15 Nov 2011
Location: Beyond the gateline
Posts: 2,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brianthegiant View Post
...but I suspect thats why you added the 'Let hope' qualifier
It was, yes.
__________________
Yellow lines can help your safety. Stand back | Stay safe
Pedants: My avatar pic isn't actually designed to show a temporary speed restriction
tsr is online now  
Unread 28th May 2012, 01:17   #19
HSTEd
Established Member
 
Join Date: 14 Jul 2011
Posts: 3,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neilmc View Post
So would this site be prohibited from publishing timings of such trains, or sightings of them - after all they will be in transit for some consierable time!
Unless they will also be eliminated from websites such as Open Train Times it would be pointless, and working time tables are hardly highly restricted information.

Its also pointless since you could put someone on an overlook of the track leaving Dounreay several miles distant with a telescope (is it not in quite mountainous terrain) in a hunting hide, with instructions to alert comrades who were going to strike somewhere in Cumbria several hours before the train arrives.
HSTEd is offline  
Unread 28th May 2012, 10:43   #20
DownSouth
Member
 
Join Date: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveNewcastle View Post
"taking it by ship would reduce the chance of there being a rail crash". A rail crash? Where does that come into it?
Transporting waste by horse and cart or cancelling trains will reduce the chance of there being a rail crash! So what?
It came into it because I made a reasonable reply to the previous post which stated that taking it by rail instead of a ship was a good move because it meant there would be no nuclear material involved in a shipwreck.
Quote:
And where does high explosives at sea come into it?
If an unauthorised vessel approaches the ship and continues to do so after warnings are made on GUARD channels, it's safe to assume they are pirates and you have the escort vessel/helicopter sink it in self-defence. Pirate problem solved.

Various naval forces around the world have a significant amount of experience with escorting nuclear materials, it's a routine mission.
DownSouth is offline  
Unread 28th May 2012, 10:50   #21
Hydro
Professional Hotel Critic
Established Member
 
Hydro's Avatar
 
Join Date: 5 Mar 2007
Posts: 2,202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DownSouth View Post
Various naval forces around the world have a significant amount of experience with escorting nuclear materials, it's a routine mission.
It's routine for a UK police force too.
__________________

Album of random railway gubbins
Hydro is offline  
Unread 28th May 2012, 12:11   #22
HSTEd
Established Member
 
Join Date: 14 Jul 2011
Posts: 3,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DownSouth View Post
It came into it because I made a reasonable reply to the previous post which stated that taking it by rail instead of a ship was a good move because it meant there would be no nuclear material involved in a shipwreck.

If an unauthorised vessel approaches the ship and continues to do so after warnings are made on GUARD channels, it's safe to assume they are pirates and you have the escort vessel/helicopter sink it in self-defence. Pirate problem solved.

Various naval forces around the world have a significant amount of experience with escorting nuclear materials, it's a routine mission.
You are going to have a Royal Navy warship open fire on a British registered ship in British territorial waters simply because they don't like the course its taking?

Approaching other ships is entirely acceptable and the RN has no right to demand otherwise.


Rail transport of nuclear materials is a routine mission for the railways and British police forces.
Additionally safety per tonne-kilometre is largely irrelevent unless you are suggesting we wait till we have a bulk carrier full of material. It would be safety per ship-kilometre that is important. Indeed BNFL sent a ship to Japan carrying only 3kg of nuclear material.
HSTEd is offline  
Unread 28th May 2012, 12:29   #23
tsr
Speed of thought: ~15mph
Established Member
 
tsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: 15 Nov 2011
Location: Beyond the gateline
Posts: 2,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HSTEd View Post
You are going to have a Royal Navy warship open fire on a British registered ship in British territorial waters simply because they don't like the course its taking?

Approaching other ships is entirely acceptable and the RN has no right to demand otherwise.
You have to have a very good reason to be on a course that could result in you meeting another vessel. If you do not declare your intentions when approaching a vessel which is clearly under Navy guard you can expect some form of intervention. Depending on the discretion of the senior officers, this may or may not involve live fire.

The registration of the vessel does not necessarily matter and we have not had any particular reason to assume that the hypothetical ship you mention is British-registered anyway. As you full well know, a number of vessels of many different national registrations operate in our territorial waters.
__________________
Yellow lines can help your safety. Stand back | Stay safe
Pedants: My avatar pic isn't actually designed to show a temporary speed restriction
tsr is online now  
Unread 28th May 2012, 17:08   #24
IslandDweller
Member
 
Join Date: 5 Dec 2011
Posts: 10
Angry

The Civil Nuclear Constabulary are routinely armed, and have been since I was a lad (which is many years ago). This is not news - though clearly some campaigners want to make it so.
IslandDweller is offline  
Unread 28th May 2012, 23:39   #25
Bodie
Member
 
Bodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10 Oct 2011
Posts: 46
Default

Hmmm, I did half suspect their might be some slightly different cargo on these trains there is the norm.

The crux of the matter here then appears to be - As this is a new kind of shipment then is carried at the moment on UK nuclear trains then there might be a need for armed guards. A very sensisble thing to do when a new shipment is to be moved by any means of transport. I hope they will come to the correct conclusion whatever that may turn out to be.

As for the campaigner's, no doubt if the powers that be just dismissed armed guards and said it will be treated as any other nuclear train, they'd spit feathers and thus the following would be on the BBC instead :-

'Campaigner's fears at unarmed nuclear trains'

Your damned if you do and damned it you don't

These campaigner's must take the Caroline Lucas view on the world

If you don't like it, feign stupidity

Anyone who watches Question Time will know what I speak of. Miss Lucas don't understand why we need nuclear anything.
She also along with that Germaine Green woman think it 'strange' that we have an overseas island so far far away. Thus we must let it go and sod all the people on it.

My distain for such people reaches new heights everyday

Bodie
Bodie is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 15:27.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© RailUK Forums 2005 - the year after 2012