RailUK Forums
RailUK Forums > Other Rail & Transport > Other Public Transport


Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Unread 10th June 2012, 21:16   #76
EM2
Established Member
 
EM2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 16 Nov 2008
Location: Forest Gate, London
Posts: 2,276
Default

There is a lot of sympathy for the victim, and a lot for the driver. This is not 'he or she is right or wrong' issue, but an issue where an unfortunate set of circumstances led to this terrible event.
The victim was short of the fare. The driver could have let her travel, but didn't. Another passenger could have given her the money but didn't.
It appears she want to an ATM. She could've got a taxi, but she didn't.
She called her Mum, who could have suggested she wait in the City Centre, but she didn't.
__________________
'Captain, this is madness!' 'This is not madness. This is Hassocks!'
1343 miles in 23h 47m with no repeat mileage. Can you prove you've beaten it?

Last edited by bb21; 11th June 2012 at 00:33. Reason: Deleted Quote Removed
EM2 is offline  
Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today!
Unread 10th June 2012, 21:27   #77
Tracky
Member
 
Join Date: 17 Jul 2011
Posts: 207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 455driver View Post
I thought it was mainly The Barrow Boy going down that route?
My comment was based on here and elsewhere but his postings have been prolific.

Anyway - my point...

Quote:
My guess is he probably feels terrible and probably does blame himself more than he deserves to.
Tracky is offline  
Unread 10th June 2012, 22:32   #78
WestCoast
Established Member
 
WestCoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: 19 Jun 2010
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 4,520
Default

The Daily Mail is the most read online newspaper in Britain and one of the most read "news" websites on the world stage. Personally, I can't stand a rag that thrives on trying to get people outraged on every page!

If the scenario that is being reported is actually true over what we hear as the driver's account on here, then the actions of the driver and passengers were part of the sequence of events that led to the rape.

However, as EM2 notes, she could have called a taxi with money from this aforementioned ATM or waited for a pick up in a well lit central area. So, the decisions there are part of the sequence of events.

While these sequences of events led the victim and the rapist to cross paths, there can only be one person who is to blame for such a horrific attack.

Last edited by WestCoast; 10th June 2012 at 22:43.
WestCoast is offline  
Unread 11th June 2012, 13:09   #79
Wolfie
Member
 
Join Date: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 478
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 455driver View Post
Facts of this case-
1/ the woman was out alone at 3AM, where had she been, church?,
2/ she did not have enough money for the bus fare, why not?,
3/ the driver is under no obligation to carry someone that cannot pay the fare.
4/ no other passenger offered to pay the 20p, why not?

Other possible scenarios-
A/ Did she explain why she didnt have the money,
B/ did she play the "I am a lone female and you must help me" card,
C/ did she get stroppy when the driver failed to acquiesce to her request?

Oh I was a bus driver for nearly 20 years and have heard all the excuses going about why the passenger didnt have the right/ any money for the fare and have every sympathy with the bus driver and some for the woman, what was she doing out at 3AM again, I have forgotten?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Thank you Heinz 57 for posting "the other side" to this story, makes things much much clearer. I look forward to the apology in the Daily Fail, oh wait a minute they never do apologise for lying do they after all its all about selling newspapers at all costs isnt it.
My bold

I actually agree with your comments about the driver. However, part of your comment goes way too far and is very possibly the most outrageous comment I have ever seen on this forum. It pretty much says that a woman who is out by herself at 3am must expect to be raped. I really hope that this is clumsiness in wording and does not reflect your actual views.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
OK, I was so incensed when I saw that comment that I hit 'reply' immediately. I have read on and seen your later comments which do indeed show it was clumsiness in wording. My apologies.

For some reason I can post on my work IT but can't edit, hence an additional response.....

Last edited by Wolfie; 11th June 2012 at 13:09. Reason: Double post prevention system
Wolfie is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:11.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© RailUK Forums 2005 - the year after 2012