RailUK Forums
RailUK Forums > Fares, Ticketing & Routeing > Disputes & Prosecutions
Unread 10th June 2012, 09:03   #1
FenMan
Member
 
Join Date: 13 Oct 2011
Posts: 74
Default Inconsistent behaviour by FGW

Yesterday I was travelling from Blackwater to Twyford via Reading and had an unpleasant experience at the Excess Fares window, platform side of the barriers, at Reading station.

Some background:-
- Blackwater is a Penalty Fares station with signs clearly stating this.
- There used to be a ticket machine on each platform, but the machine on the Reading platform was removed following persistent vandalism.
- The remaining TM, on the Guildford platform, does not take cash and is frequently out of order. For a long time this machine had a faulty card reader and also the touchscreen fails when it has been raining as it is not adequately shielded from the elements.
- AFAIK, all other Penalty Fares stations on this route have ticket buying opportunities on both platforms, apart from Farnborough North where, due to the layout, nearly all travellers have to go past the TM before accessing either platform.
- Those familiar with the layout at Blackwater will know that, for travellers approaching the station from the town side who want to go to Reading, it is not a trivial matter to go round to the Guildford platform on the off chance that the remaining TM is working.
- FGW guards know there are issues with purchasing tickets at Blackwater and all happily sell tickets on board. Some come through the train specifically asking "Any tickets required from Blackwater?". It has long been established practice for Reading-bound passengers joining at Blackwater to buy tickets on the train.

On to yesterday.

- Joined the 11:02 train at Blackwater with around 20 others. The service was full and standing as it originated at Gatwick.
- There was no sign of the guard during the journey to Reading, which is unusual.
- As I had plenty of time to make the connection to Twyford I went to buy a ticket at the excess fares window.
- During the purchase I was approached by a FGW employee who flashed his RPI badge and asked why I hadn't already purchased a ticket.
- I explained that, for the reasons stated above, this was my first reasonable opportunity to purchase a ticket.
- He disputed this, saying I should have purchased a ticket at Blackwater. When I pointed out this was unreasonable due to the lack of an accessible TM on the Reading platform, he changed tack and said I should have gone to the back of the train and knocked on the door to obtain a ticket from the guard. I asked him if he was sure about that. He said he was sure - this was stated in the NRCoC he said. I thought it pointless to argue with that assertion and pointed out that I wasn't trying to evade the fare, otherwise why had I gone to the Excess Fares window to buy a ticket?
- His attitude was aggressive and he was speaking loudly, seemingly to create a "scene".
- Meanwhile, a queue was building up behind me and he switched his attention to the next two people in line, asking where they had come from. When they both said "Blackwater" he muttered something under his breath, terminated the interview and wandered off.
- I then finished buying the ticket.

So, there is a disconnect between the behaviour of guards on this route and that of this particular RPI. Obviously the problem would be resolved if a new TM is installed on the Reading platform at Blackwater, however, assuming this isn't going to happen anytime soon, what is the best way to ensure that all FGW staff have a consistent and pragmatic approach to passengers travelling to Reading from Blackwater?
FenMan is offline  
Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today!
Unread 10th June 2012, 09:59   #2
yorkie
Fares Advisor
Administrator
 
Join Date: 6 Jun 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 20,980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FenMan View Post
....he changed tack and said I should have gone to the back of the train and knocked on the door to obtain a ticket from the guard. I asked him if he was sure about that. He said he was sure - this was stated in the NRCoC he said. I thought it pointless to argue with that assertion and pointed out that I wasn't trying to evade the fare, otherwise why had I gone to the Excess Fares window to buy a ticket?...
This simply isn't true. Feel free to PM me if you'd like me to proof read a letter of complaint to FGW. I hope you got the name of the RPI. Treat it as a training issue and put the onus on FGW to provide adequate training to their RPIs. I'd also ask the question (rather than state it is incorrect).

Quote:
Originally Posted by FenMan View Post
- His attitude was aggressive and he was speaking loudly, seemingly to create a "scene".
- Meanwhile, a queue was building up behind me and he switched his attention to the next two people in line, asking where they had come from. When they both said "Blackwater" he muttered something under his breath, terminated the interview and wandered off.
- I then finished buying the ticket.?
Yep, some of them are like that. However I'd avoid mentioning this in your letter, and keep it about the facts rather than the RPIs behaviour.

I'd have considered asking them if they'd be witnesses to the RPIs behaviour (after the RPI had walked off).
yorkie is offline  
Unread 10th June 2012, 15:27   #3
BrownE
In a loop
Member
 
Join Date: 9 Apr 2012
Posts: 106
Default

Unfortunately, I have found Reading Station staff particularly bad for this. I came off a train, went to excess fares and was also told about how I was eligible for a penalty fare. Obviously, I wasn't eligible for a penalty fare, the woman wasn't an authorised collector anyway she was trying to "scare me" as far as I could tell with incorrect fact.

A complaint went to FGW. They agreed it was wrong and told me they would speak to the station manager about it. The exact (relevant) wording was:
Quote:
I'll make sure the colleagues on duty that day are spoken to and reminded that this kind of attitude just isn't acceptable.
I travelled from RDW, similar situation, turned up with the exact change for a ticket and they refused to believe I travelled from RDW, despite telling them the platform number the train came off and the time it left. I was asked for "evidence of where I travelled from". I was threatened with "I'll call the BTP if you didn't tell me where you came from" and told "it's a criminal offence".

Complaint to FGW, response said all about how fare evasion is terrible and that staff need to sell the correct ticket otherwise we loose millions.

Summary, excess fares at Reading are often (not always) poorly run. In relation to your case OP, you are correct (as is Yorkie).

Last edited by BrownE; 10th June 2012 at 15:38.
BrownE is offline  
Unread 10th June 2012, 15:42   #4
calc7
InterCity
Established Member
 
calc7's Avatar
 
Join Date: 8 Aug 2011
Posts: 2,002
Default

I too have experience provocative and assuming questioning at the Reading excess fares window - two summers ago now.

I had just got off a HST from Paddington and was intending to catch the next XC Voyager to York, which was in about 15 minutes' time. I presented my railcard and asked for a Leamington Spa to York SVR for immediate travel.

Needless to say, a keen RPI nearby overheard and came across and started on me with a very accusatory attitude, thinking I was trying to use it to travel via London. It wasn't until I showed him the Super Off-Peak Return (via Banbury) that I was in the middle of travelling on did he back off and mutter something about "young people trying it on".

(Reason for the extremely long route, which actually saw me go via Manchester due to engineering works in the Derby area overrunning was due to cheap ticket already held plus wanting to return to Leamington after visiting friends)
calc7 is offline  
Unread 10th June 2012, 16:06   #5
Captain Chaos
Member
 
Captain Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: 31 Jan 2011
Posts: 454
Default

The reason for such provocative questioning is because asking for tickets from RDW,TLH,TWY,EAR and WKM when they haven't come from there is endemic.

Case in point from a few weekends ago:

Working a stopper from Redhill to Reading. Barrier staff were working later than usual and I was aware of this. Large groups board at Sandhurst and Crowthorne. ALL refused to buy tickets off me because a large section told everyone not to as the barriers would be open and they will be able to walk out without paying. One even cheekily said I should be thanking them for making my job easier!

Made a phone call to confirm that the RPI's and that were still there. They were. Some were even manning the lifts which was just as well as when we pulled in a few ran for the lifts and the others started requesting Groupsave Singles from Earley and Wokingham.

Sadly for them all I had already pre-empted this and had phoned ahead warning them that they would probably be doing this and that only 4 had boarded at WKM (they had tickets, I'd already checked them). The group using the lift got caught and MG11'd by a group of RPI's and the others got refused any and all discounts and had to buy from where they got on.

The groups response? We'll just get away with it next weekend.

This is perhaps an extreme scenario, but it happens nonetheless and this evasion happens constantly at Reading. At one point we were asking for proof of residence before selling tickets from Reading West at one point, that's how bad it was getting.

I do have sympathy for our Genuine travellers though.
Captain Chaos is offline  
Unread 10th June 2012, 16:27   #6
adc82140
Interested commuter
Member
 
Join Date: 10 May 2008
Posts: 207
Default

I get this a lot travelling from Twyford to Reading- I live near Twyford. I go shopping in Reading. With my Gold Card discount it's cheaper to go by train into Reading than pay to park the car in the town centre. But I'm sick of being accused of fare dodging by the barrier staff, as quite often the barriers are programmed to reject Twyford tickets.

I'm always very polite to the barrier staff, but quite frankly I'm getting sick of being accused of swinging it. It may surprise FGW that some people really do travel the short hop from Twyford. If FGW can't get their house in order with regard to revenue protection, that's hardly my problem.

Back to the OP, surely at any unstaffed penalty fares station, if the TVM only takes cards, surely you're entitled to pay cash to the guard or excess window and still get discounts etc??
adc82140 is offline  
Unread 10th June 2012, 17:03   #7
island
I'm from M390
Established Member
 
Join Date: 30 Dec 2010
Location: SE12
Posts: 5,720
Default

Some staff will make the argument that you should use a card if you have one.
island is offline  
Unread 10th June 2012, 17:05   #8
BrownE
In a loop
Member
 
Join Date: 9 Apr 2012
Posts: 106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by island View Post
Some staff will make the argument that you should use a card if you have one.
Good luck proving I had sufficient funds to pay.
BrownE is offline  
Unread 10th June 2012, 17:09   #9
Captain Chaos
Member
 
Captain Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: 31 Jan 2011
Posts: 454
Default

In the 7 years of working at Reading station I have never heard of them rejecting a ticket because they are from Twyford. They are however quite often programmed to reject child tickets. Especially during major events such as Reading Festival.

I shall have a word with the barrier staff as I have never heard of being able to program barriers to reject tickets from a certain location (unless someone else can confirm of course!)
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrownE View Post
Good luck proving I had sufficient funds to pay.
Code 10 call?

Last edited by Captain Chaos; 10th June 2012 at 17:09. Reason: Double post prevention system
Captain Chaos is offline  
Unread 10th June 2012, 17:35   #10
Failed Unit
Established Member
 
Join Date: 26 Jan 2009
Location: Central Belt
Posts: 3,938
Default

I think they had at Edinburgh before as part of a "Sting". The RPI at South Gyle stamped the ticket so it was to see if passengers had just ordered ticket from South Gyle but say collected it from the TVM at another station to exit the barriers. If your ticket didn't have a stamp they would as where you other ticket to get to South Gyle was. Not sure however what would happen if you had thrown away the 1st ticket. I tend to keep all splits now until I have completed the journey just in case.
Failed Unit is offline  
Unread 10th June 2012, 17:50   #11
richw
cornish train fan
Established Member
 
richw's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10 Jun 2010
Location: Cornwall mostly
Posts: 2,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrownE View Post
Good luck proving I had sufficient funds to pay.
I'm a prime example of this, I had £150 cash in my wallet yesterday, but only £1.06 available in my bank for which i have a debit card for. In an attempt to save money, I transfer all money to my savings except a small amount each week to live off otherwise i spend money i cant afford to!
richw is offline  
Unread 10th June 2012, 18:14   #12
BrownE
In a loop
Member
 
Join Date: 9 Apr 2012
Posts: 106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Chaos View Post
Code 10 call?
You would have to take my card without consent for that. I only have to provide my name and address, not a debit/credit card on request!

A code 10 will not give you the balance anyway or tell you anything about the actual account. You only answer yes/no questions.
BrownE is offline  
Unread 10th June 2012, 18:21   #13
bignosemac
Backseat mod apparently
On Moderation
 
bignosemac's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2,455
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by island View Post
Some staff will make the argument that you should use a card if you have one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Chaos View Post
Code 10 call?
Symptomatic of the attitude of some rail staff is that.

The industry fails to provide adequate ticket purchasing facilities yet will still heap suspicion and onus on the passenger. With, in this case, a misguided belief that staff can somehow find out whether a passenger has sufficient funds on a card by making a 'code 10' call. You won't win any friends with your merchant services provider by making a code 10 call for that reason. Code 10 is to be used only when there is suspicion about the cardholders legitimacy to use the card. It is not to be used for a general balance enquiry or some sort of authorisation. And like BrownE, I too would not even be handing over a card when I travelled from a station that had 'card only' TVM facilities and I'd wanted to pay cash. Dare ask me for one and I'll be sticking to the minimum information I'm obliged by railway law to give.

If a ticket vending machine is card only and I want to pay cash then it is totally irrelevant whether I have a card with sufficient funds. I wish to pay cash and shouldn't be given the third degree at a gateline, excess window or by an RPI when the industry has failed to provide facilities for me to buy a ticket.

And no, I shouldn't have to go looking for a guard or delay my journey at an interchange station.

Last edited by bignosemac; 30th June 2012 at 14:56.
bignosemac is offline  
Unread 10th June 2012, 21:19   #14
Tracky
Member
 
Join Date: 17 Jul 2011
Posts: 207
Default

We asked if we could refuse to accept cards for small fares or put in place a lower limit to stop stupid timewasting card sales. The answer was as a railway ticket agent we were forced to allow all methods of payment to be used for all rail tickets. Fairly clear I would say to look at the flip side of forcing people to use cards.

I am not keen on Card Only TVMs been used as a 'solution' to railway ticketing.
Tracky is offline  
Unread 10th June 2012, 22:22   #15
sheff1
Established Member
 
Join Date: 24 Dec 2009
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 1,233
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrownE View Post
I travelled from RDW, similar situation, turned up with the exact change for a ticket and they refused to believe I travelled from RDW, despite telling them the platform number the train came off and the time it left. I was asked for "evidence of where I travelled from". I was threatened with "I'll call the BTP if you didn't tell me where you came from" and told "it's a criminal offence".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Chaos View Post
At one point we were asking for proof of residence before selling tickets from Reading West at one point, that's how bad it was getting.
So not only is it a criminal offence to travel from Reading West, if you do somehow surmount that barrier, you can only purchase a ticket if you are a local resident and can prove the same. I would say 'unbelievable' but I know that on UK Rail it is totally believable.

I assume you can tell us under what legislation non-residents can be prevented from travelling from, or purchasing tickets from, an unstaffed station.

Last edited by sheff1; 10th June 2012 at 22:39. Reason: Double post prevention system
sheff1 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 15:18.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© RailUK Forums 2005 - the year after 2012