RailUK Forums
RailUK Forums > Other Rail & Transport > International Transport


Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Unread 20th June 2012, 20:54   #1
James P
New Member
 
Join Date: 20 Jun 2012
Posts: 1
Default Enterprise

Why does the entreprise fail so much. I took two trips recently and both times the service had failed however I do think its not happening as much now.
James P is offline  
Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today!
Unread 20th June 2012, 21:39   #2
IR-Mark4/ICR
Member
 
Join Date: 17 Mar 2012
Posts: 41
Default

In simple English the engine overloads as it has to run the train and provide HEP to the train. It puts the loco's under a great deal of stress which is why they fail a lot. To avoid this the loco are changed around often and any loco that operates the entreprise will operate on the Mark 4 on Cork line which HEP is not supplied from loco and on Freight servces from Dublin to Waterford and Ballina to give them a break.

Currently Mark 3 generator are being/had a refurb and will operate on the entreprise soon which will greathly help the loco's. There was a test run recently and all went well.

NI owned loco 8208 had such a bad failure rate it was operating on freight services for months before it went back to the entreprise
IR-Mark4/ICR is offline  
Unread 21st June 2012, 08:04   #3
HSTEd
Established Member
 
Join Date: 14 Jul 2011
Posts: 3,476
Default

Why do the locos keep failing? Surely providing HEP for significant amounts of time was in the specification when they were ordered?

I thought they were similar in many ways to Class 67s which have no such problems?
HSTEd is offline  
Unread 21st June 2012, 08:31   #4
PFX
Member
 
PFX's Avatar
 
Join Date: 18 Dec 2011
Posts: 249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HSTEd View Post
Why do the locos keep failing? Surely providing HEP for significant amounts of time was in the specification when they were ordered?
You would have thought. Post two answers both your questions though.
PFX is offline  
Unread 21st June 2012, 22:55   #5
jamesontheroad
Member
 
Join Date: 24 Jan 2009
Posts: 856
Default

A mismatch of locomotive and rolling stock, hampered by a generation in which there has been almost complete shift from loco-hauled services to DMU operations thoroughout Ireland (north and south). Plus the de Deitrich stock used on the Enterprise are odd balls... Not much commonality with other fleets and certainly not enough to ever run hourly services.
jamesontheroad is offline  
Unread 22nd June 2012, 00:40   #6
LE Greys
Established Member
 
LE Greys's Avatar
 
Join Date: 6 Mar 2010
Location: Hitchin
Posts: 5,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James P View Post
Why does the entreprise fail so much?
Because the engines cannae take any more!

That's surprisingly accurate.
__________________
Always thinking as I type, sometimes not very well
LE Greys is offline  
Unread 22nd June 2012, 09:06   #7
89-763-733
Member
 
89-763-733's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2 Jul 2011
Posts: 189
Default

When the 201s wete ordered GM strongly advised the railways to include an auxiliary engine on the loco for Head End Power (ETH) but were ignored
__________________
1035hrs departing Belfast to Portrush has been delayed a further 9 minutes, total delay 100 minutes, due to knock on affect of mechanical difficulties
89-763-733 is offline  
Unread 22nd June 2012, 12:18   #8
HSTEd
Established Member
 
Join Date: 14 Jul 2011
Posts: 3,476
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 89-763-733 View Post
When the 201s wete ordered GM strongly advised the railways to include an auxiliary engine on the loco for Head End Power (ETH) but were ignored
But why would this be neccesary?

Couldn't they just not use the top notch on the power selector while providing ETS? Or just derate the traction system to reduce the stress on the power plant.
400kW being used for ETS applies the same stress as 400 additional traction kilowatts.

This just seems like someone screwed up the calculations.
HSTEd is offline  
Unread 22nd June 2012, 16:02   #9
MattE2010
The cry was No Surrender
Established Member
 
MattE2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: 16 May 2010
Location: North
Posts: 9,632
Default

I'm not familiar with railways outside of the UK and Republic of Ireland, but surely 2h00-2h15 to cover 113~ miles makes it one of the slowest end-to-end inter-city services in Western Europe?
__________________
RIP Clive Burr
MattE2010 is offline  
Unread 22nd June 2012, 18:04   #10
IR-Mark4/ICR
Member
 
Join Date: 17 Mar 2012
Posts: 41
Default

It is very slow but there are two main factors. Very speed restricted around Dublin Area and 90mph is max limit in NI which dosn't help.
IR-Mark4/ICR is offline  
Unread 23rd June 2012, 20:35   #11
VTPreston_Tez
On Moderation
 
Join Date: 26 Jan 2012
Location: Preston
Posts: 1,048
Default

If this really is the case isn't there calls for new trains all together or are the faulty trains relatively new?
VTPreston_Tez is offline  
Unread 23rd June 2012, 22:09   #12
yorkie
Fares Advisor
Administrator
 
Join Date: 6 Jun 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 20,743
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VTPreston_Tez View Post
If this really is the case isn't there calls for new trains all together or are the faulty trains relatively new?
You appear to have missed post #2 of this thread? Also the Rolling stock section of the Enterprise Wikipedia page may help.
yorkie is offline  
Unread 25th June 2012, 12:48   #13
OxtedL
ႨpǝʇxO
Quizmaster
 
Join Date: 23 Mar 2011
Posts: 1,374
Default

Removed.

Last edited by OxtedL; 28th June 2012 at 11:54.
OxtedL is offline  
Unread 27th June 2012, 16:03   #14
Cyberbeagle
Member
 
Cyberbeagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 5 Nov 2011
Posts: 46
Default

The obvious answer would've been not only to use the Mk3 Genny Vans, but also the Mk3's themselves to boost the rolling stock fleet. The genny vans look well in Enterprise livery.

In regards line speed, it does tend to slow remarkably down when approaching Dublin. As far as I can tell this is due to IE prioritising local services over the intercity.
Cyberbeagle is offline  
Unread 27th June 2012, 20:49   #15
4SRKT
Established Member
 
Join Date: 9 Jan 2009
Posts: 4,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyberbeagle View Post
The obvious answer would've been not only to use the Mk3 Genny Vans, but also the Mk3's themselves to boost the rolling stock fleet. The genny vans look well in Enterprise livery.

In regards line speed, it does tend to slow remarkably down when approaching Dublin. As far as I can tell this is due to IE prioritising local services over the intercity.


fastest time Belfast > Dublin in 1991 book 1 hour 55 for 111 class (nearly 1,000 HP less than a 201) plus up to 10 mk IIs on a Friday on 70/75 mph Max GNR vintage bull head rail on wooden sleepers and semaphore signalling. Hmmmmm.
4SRKT is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© RailUK Forums 2005 - the year after 2012