![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: 20 Jun 2012
Posts: 1
|
Why does the entreprise fail so much. I took two trips recently and both times the service had failed however I do think its not happening as much now.
|
|
|
| Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: 17 Mar 2012
Posts: 41
|
In simple English the engine overloads as it has to run the train and provide HEP to the train. It puts the loco's under a great deal of stress which is why they fail a lot. To avoid this the loco are changed around often and any loco that operates the entreprise will operate on the Mark 4 on Cork line which HEP is not supplied from loco and on Freight servces from Dublin to Waterford and Ballina to give them a break.
Currently Mark 3 generator are being/had a refurb and will operate on the entreprise soon which will greathly help the loco's. There was a test run recently and all went well. NI owned loco 8208 had such a bad failure rate it was operating on freight services for months before it went back to the entreprise |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 14 Jul 2011
Posts: 3,476
|
Why do the locos keep failing? Surely providing HEP for significant amounts of time was in the specification when they were ordered?
I thought they were similar in many ways to Class 67s which have no such problems? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: 18 Dec 2011
Posts: 249
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: 24 Jan 2009
Posts: 856
|
A mismatch of locomotive and rolling stock, hampered by a generation in which there has been almost complete shift from loco-hauled services to DMU operations thoroughout Ireland (north and south). Plus the de Deitrich stock used on the Enterprise are odd balls... Not much commonality with other fleets and certainly not enough to ever run hourly services.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 6 Mar 2010
Location: Hitchin
Posts: 5,358
|
Because the engines cannae take any more!
That's surprisingly accurate.
__________________
Always thinking as I type, sometimes not very well |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: 2 Jul 2011
Posts: 189
|
When the 201s wete ordered GM strongly advised the railways to include an auxiliary engine on the loco for Head End Power (ETH) but were ignored
__________________
1035hrs departing Belfast to Portrush has been delayed a further 9 minutes, total delay 100 minutes, due to knock on affect of mechanical difficulties |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 14 Jul 2011
Posts: 3,476
|
Quote:
Couldn't they just not use the top notch on the power selector while providing ETS? Or just derate the traction system to reduce the stress on the power plant. 400kW being used for ETS applies the same stress as 400 additional traction kilowatts. This just seems like someone screwed up the calculations. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The cry was No Surrender
Established Member
Join Date: 16 May 2010
Location: North
Posts: 9,632
|
I'm not familiar with railways outside of the UK and Republic of Ireland, but surely 2h00-2h15 to cover 113~ miles makes it one of the slowest end-to-end inter-city services in Western Europe?
__________________
RIP Clive Burr |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: 17 Mar 2012
Posts: 41
|
It is very slow but there are two main factors. Very speed restricted around Dublin Area and 90mph is max limit in NI which dosn't help.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
On Moderation
Join Date: 26 Jan 2012
Location: Preston
Posts: 1,048
|
If this really is the case isn't there calls for new trains all together or are the faulty trains relatively new?
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Fares Advisor
Administrator
Join Date: 6 Jun 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 20,743
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
ႨpǝʇxO
Quizmaster
Join Date: 23 Mar 2011
Posts: 1,374
|
Removed.
Last edited by OxtedL; 28th June 2012 at 11:54. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: 5 Nov 2011
Posts: 46
|
The obvious answer would've been not only to use the Mk3 Genny Vans, but also the Mk3's themselves to boost the rolling stock fleet. The genny vans look well in Enterprise livery.
In regards line speed, it does tend to slow remarkably down when approaching Dublin. As far as I can tell this is due to IE prioritising local services over the intercity. |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 9 Jan 2009
Posts: 4,162
|
Quote:
fastest time Belfast > Dublin in 1991 book 1 hour 55 for 111 class (nearly 1,000 HP less than a 201) plus up to 10 mk IIs on a Friday on 70/75 mph Max GNR vintage bull head rail on wooden sleepers and semaphore signalling. Hmmmmm. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|