RailUK Forums
RailUK Forums > Fares, Ticketing & Routeing > Fares Advice & Policy


Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Unread 23rd June 2012, 08:42   #1
Butts
Established Member
 
Butts's Avatar
 
Join Date: 16 Jan 2011
Location: Falkirk
Posts: 4,013
Default Refund for train cancelled due to flooding?

I need some further advice I was supposed to be travelling from FKG to Berwick upon Tweed today 1046 (0755 ex Inverness) and returning on 1540 from Berwick Upon Tweed to FKG.

Checked to see how the train was running to find it has been cancelled
due to flooding.

I have an Advanced 1st Class Ticket for both portions of the journey. As the outward service has been cancelled and my time was restricted in Berwick will I be able to claim a refund for both portions and how ?

Thanks
Butts is offline  
Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today!
Unread 23rd June 2012, 10:20   #2
John @ home
Routeing Guide specialist
Fares Advisor
 
Join Date: 1 Mar 2008
Posts: 3,896
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butts View Post
As the outward service has been cancelled and my time was restricted in Berwick will I be able to claim a refund for both portions and how ?
Yes. Use one single copy of East Coast's Delay Repay form to claim for outward and return legs. If both legs were booked in the same transaction, East Coast will treat them as a return journey and give a refund for both legs. Even if they were booked separately, we have had reports of train companies treating two Advance singles as a return ticket where the claim is made on one form.

As always, take a photocopy of both claim form and tickets before sending them off. East Coast do have an online claim facility but it is not good at coping with two Advance singles being used for a return journey.
John @ home is online now  
Unread 23rd June 2012, 15:40   #3
Butts
Established Member
 
Butts's Avatar
 
Join Date: 16 Jan 2011
Location: Falkirk
Posts: 4,013
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John @ home View Post
Yes. Use one single copy of East Coast's Delay Repay form to claim for outward and return legs. If both legs were booked in the same transaction, East Coast will treat them as a return journey and give a refund for both legs. Even if they were booked separately, we have had reports of train companies treating two Advance singles as a return ticket where the claim is made on one form.

As always, take a photocopy of both claim form and tickets before sending them off. East Coast do have an online claim facility but it is not good at coping with two Advance singles being used for a return journey.
Thanks, where do I get a delay repay form from - is it available online ?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Quote:
Originally Posted by Butts View Post
Thanks, where do I get a delay repay form from - is it available online ?
Have found the form now , however I think I will write to East Coast Customer Service to avoid any complications in the matter. I note the form is scanned by a computer and I feel mine needs human intervention.

The fact the 1046 from FKG to Berwick-upon-Tweed was cancelled meant I was unable to utilise the Berwick-upon-Tweed -FKG 1540 return service I was booked on.

The short layover was to visit The Castle and come back afterwards almost straight away. This obviously became untenable with the cancellation of the outward service.

I booked it online through East Coast and am in The Loyalty Club so I should be ok hopefully.

Last edited by Butts; 23rd June 2012 at 15:40. Reason: Double post prevention system
Butts is offline  
Unread 23rd June 2012, 15:50   #4
142094
142 aficionado
Established Member
 
142094's Avatar
 
Join Date: 7 Nov 2009
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 7,717
Default

A few winters ago I was due to go to Inverness using two advances to make a return journey - the heavy snow put paid to that. Sent them the tickets and had a refund soon after (although the amount of refunds they had to proces meant it was much later than usual).
__________________
Stand Clear of the Doors, Please.
142094 is offline  
Unread 23rd June 2012, 16:12   #5
Butts
Established Member
 
Butts's Avatar
 
Join Date: 16 Jan 2011
Location: Falkirk
Posts: 4,013
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 142094 View Post
A few winters ago I was due to go to Inverness using two advances to make a return journey - the heavy snow put paid to that. Sent them the tickets and had a refund soon after (although the amount of refunds they had to proces meant it was much later than usual).
Yes thanks for that I have the tickets and letter ready to despatch. I'm glad in a way it was cancelled as the delays being experienced on the return leg from Berwick to FKG seem horrendous - I was supposed to catch the 1540 back and at the time of writing (1710) it has not even reached Berwick yet.

Have to work tonight so I would have been right in the midden - teaches me a valuable lesson do not book a daytrip when you have a commitment in the evening - just in case
Butts is offline  
Unread 23rd June 2012, 17:29   #6
Failed Unit
Established Member
 
Join Date: 26 Jan 2009
Location: Central Belt
Posts: 3,937
Default

I have never understood why East Coast cancel and put on an additional service rather than just depart 1h15 late like was the case this morning? Is it to allow the AP holders to get the next train without penalty?
Failed Unit is offline  
Unread 23rd June 2012, 19:55   #7
hairyhandedfool
TOC employee
Established Member
 
Join Date: 14 Apr 2008
Posts: 5,188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Failed Unit View Post
I have never understood why East Coast cancel and put on an additional service rather than just depart 1h15 late like was the case this morning? Is it to allow the AP holders to get the next train without penalty?
Money.

If EC were likely to pay the fine for late running it is probably cheaper for them to cancel the service than pay the fine for late running. The additional service would then be running 'on time'.
__________________
These views are my own and not, in any way, those of my employer, though they may choose to agree with them if they wish.
hairyhandedfool is online now  
Unread 24th June 2012, 10:56   #8
michael769
cynic extrodinaire
Established Member
 
Join Date: 9 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hairyhandedfool View Post
Money.

If EC were likely to pay the fine for late running it is probably cheaper for them to cancel the service than pay the fine for late running. The additional service would then be running 'on time'.
Another reason is to fudge the stats. They will have separate punctuality and reliability targets and if they are getting close to the limit on punctuality but have headroom on the reliability, then they might want to take a reliability hit instead.
michael769 is offline  
Unread 24th June 2012, 11:11   #9
yorkie
Fares Advisor
Administrator
 
Join Date: 6 Jun 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 20,757
Default

It would also prevent people trying to claim a reserved seat because their service is running when other services are cancelled.

The calling patterns may also be different, so it may avoid confusion there too.
yorkie is offline  
Unread 24th June 2012, 11:44   #10
Blindtraveler
Scotlands No.1 Pacer Fan!
Established Member
 
Join Date: 28 Feb 2011
Location: Edinburgh Scotland United Kingdom
Posts: 2,585
Default

Going a bit O/T but full credit to EC staff yesturday at EDB coping with too few sets and crews and too many pax. Equally fuj marks for running the 07:52 off ABD despite some Aberdeen crew not getting in til late Friday. I dont think the 09:52 left though. A great effort and a lot of journeys saved - the 07:52 was rather full by EDB.
Blindtraveler is online now  
Unread 24th June 2012, 16:07   #11
DownSouth
Member
 
Join Date: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Failed Unit View Post
I have never understood why East Coast cancel and put on an additional service rather than just depart 1h15 late like was the case this morning? Is it to allow the AP holders to get the next train without penalty?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hairyhandedfool View Post
Money.

If EC were likely to pay the fine for late running it is probably cheaper for them to cancel the service than pay the fine for late running. The additional service would then be running 'on time'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by michael769 View Post
Another reason is to fudge the stats. They will have separate punctuality and reliability targets and if they are getting close to the limit on punctuality but have headroom on the reliability, then they might want to take a reliability hit instead.
Quote:
Originally Posted by yorkie View Post
It would also prevent people trying to claim a reserved seat because their service is running when other services are cancelled.

The calling patterns may also be different, so it may avoid confusion there too.
Could also be that the situation with the disruption was evolving quickly and it was uncertain how long it would be before they could get things going again.

Are stats really an issue though? Wouldn't companies be given the chance to have their performance calculated without genuine force majeure incidents like flooding being included?
DownSouth is offline  
Unread 24th June 2012, 16:31   #12
Furrball
Member
 
Join Date: 9 May 2011
Posts: 256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blindtraveler View Post
Going a bit O/T but full credit to EC staff yesturday at EDB coping with too few sets and crews and too many pax. Equally fuj marks for running the 07:52 off ABD despite some Aberdeen crew not getting in til late Friday. I dont think the 09:52 left though. A great effort and a lot of journeys saved - the 07:52 was rather full by EDB.
The 09:52 I believe was retimed to run as the 10:52 from Aberdeen
Furrball is online now  
Unread 25th June 2012, 09:53   #13
dcd
Member
 
Join Date: 28 Jan 2011
Location: Romsey
Posts: 241
Default

Will you get any compensation as this presumably is caused by severe weather which according to FGW website
Quote:
Compensation will not be available for disruption resulting from events beyond the control of the rail industry. These include trespass, vandalism, severe weather conditions and security alerts.

dcd is offline  
Unread 25th June 2012, 09:57   #14
Failed Unit
Established Member
 
Join Date: 26 Jan 2009
Location: Central Belt
Posts: 3,937
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Furrball View Post
The 09:52 I believe was retimed to run as the 10:52 from Aberdeen
I was which gave an interesting situation where you had 2x 1330 Edinburgh - London Kings Cross service in Waverley at the same time. The Aberdeen one on platform 2 and the real one on platform 19.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcd View Post
Will you get any compensation as this presumably is caused by severe weather which according to FGW website


East coasts charter gives you compensation for weather related incidents.

Last edited by Failed Unit; 25th June 2012 at 09:57. Reason: Double post prevention system
Failed Unit is offline  
Unread 25th June 2012, 10:41   #15
bb21
[Fares Advisor]
Moderator
 
bb21's Avatar
 
Join Date: 4 Feb 2010
Location: Leicester
Posts: 7,741
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcd View Post
Will you get any compensation as this presumably is caused by severe weather which according to FGW website


East Coast operates the newer and more generous Delay Repay scheme, which, as mentioned by Failed Unit above, pays compensation regardless of the cause of the delay.

http://www.eastcoast.co.uk/about-us/...1/delay-repay/
__________________
Owns 5726 142014 | The Prediction League
bb21 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:42.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© RailUK Forums 2005 - the year after 2012