RailUK Forums
RailUK Forums > UK Railway Forums > Infrastructure & Stations
Unread 28th June 2012, 22:34   #1
Masboroughlad
Member
 
Masboroughlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2 Mar 2011
Location: Midlands
Posts: 837
Default Llandudno - Utter Disgrace

I have taken my dad for a day out on the train today. We headed for Llandudno. Great day, trains reasonably well behaved (EMT and ATW) but I have to say what an utter disgrace and embarrassment Llandudno station is.

I can imagine in its day, it was very grand? Now it is just awful. Derelict platforms and infrastructure, toilets and waiting room that close at 2.30pm, a small area under cover - just horrid.

What image does this give to people arriving in the resort for the first time?

Arriva Trains Wales (and I am sure, those before you) should be totally ashamed and embarrassed. You should be made to make this place more presentable.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Llandudno June 2012 017.jpg (205.5 KB, 433 views)
File Type: jpg Llandudno June 2012 018.jpg (233.6 KB, 412 views)
File Type: jpg Llandudno June 2012 019.jpg (134.3 KB, 429 views)
File Type: jpg Llandudno June 2012 020.jpg (259.9 KB, 378 views)
Masboroughlad is offline  
Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today!
Unread 28th June 2012, 22:40   #2
VTPreston_Tez
On Moderation
 
Join Date: 26 Jan 2012
Location: Preston
Posts: 1,049
Default Llandudno - Utter Disgrace

Personally I like Llandudno, very quirky and well spaced out. My only problem is drink prices but this is a problem at other major ATW stations like Chester as well.
VTPreston_Tez is offline  
Unread 28th June 2012, 22:55   #3
emoaconr
Member
 
emoaconr's Avatar
 
Join Date: 20 Apr 2009
Location: Wrexham, United Kingdom
Posts: 220
Default

It is supposed to be under rennovation soon. There's a new glass concourse/taxi rank area that's supposed to be developed along with the new waiting areas.

The (now demolished) building on the left hand side was in a dire state of repair for decades, I've not been there since its bit the dust but I think I prefer it with it there!

Its a shame really; even as late as the early 90's, most of Llandudno's platforms were within the train shed. The current remnant of the over-all roof is absolutely pointless and now serves no purpose whatsoever.
__________________
Travelled on: 121, 142, 143, 150, 153, 156, 158, 170, 175, 185, 220, 221, 350, 390, 444, 450, 507, 508, 43/3, 57/2, 67/2, 91/4
Travelled with: AW, GR, GW, LM, ME, NT, SW, TP, VT, WB, XC
emoaconr is offline  
Unread 28th June 2012, 23:02   #4
Masboroughlad
Member
 
Masboroughlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2 Mar 2011
Location: Midlands
Posts: 837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by emoaconr View Post
It is supposed to be under rennovation soon. There's a new glass concourse/taxi rank area that's supposed to be developed along with the new waiting areas.

The (now demolished) building on the left hand side was in a dire state of repair for decades, I've not been there since its bit the dust but I think I prefer it with it there!

Its a shame really; even as late as the early 90's, most of Llandudno's platforms were within the train shed. The current remnant of the over-all roof is absolutely pointless and now serves no purpose whatsoever.
Can you point me in the direction of any artists impressions of how it will look please? Or some pics of how it used to look? ATW need a rocket behind them to get this sorted.
Masboroughlad is offline  
Unread 28th June 2012, 23:07   #5
David Goddard
Member
 
David Goddard's Avatar
 
Join Date: 8 Aug 2011
Location: Reading
Posts: 491
Default

We went to Llandudno on Tuesday morning and felt just the same.
It wouldnt take much even if they just gave it a lick of paint.
Compare with other seaside terminals (yes there are probably others that are in a similar state ,Skegness for example) but this must rank along the worst. I was in Cleethorpes a couple of years back and even that looked better than this.
__________________
Owner of 150103 (first kop) and 47406 (The original "Rail Riders" locomotive)
David Goddard is offline  
Unread 28th June 2012, 23:09   #6
xplo42
Banned
 
Join Date: 7 Aug 2005
Posts: 336
Default

FYI, the derelict parts of the station (such as the abandoned platform) may not be a part of ATW's property but in fact Network Rail.

I know of several Rail User Groups who have demanded the TOCs to clear the track and/or disused structures at certain locations of rubbish and litter but have received reply that those areas are not a part of the station premises they operate and therefore cannot access. If they want it done they have to contact NR.
xplo42 is offline  
Unread 28th June 2012, 23:14   #7
Masboroughlad
Member
 
Masboroughlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2 Mar 2011
Location: Midlands
Posts: 837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xplo42 View Post
FYI, the derelict parts of the station (such as the abandoned platform) may not be a part of ATW's property but in fact Network Rail.

I know of several Rail User Groups who have demanded the TOCs to clear the track and/or disused structures at certain locations of rubbish and litter but have received reply that those areas are not a part of the station premises they operate and therefore cannot access. If they want it done they have to contact NR.
Problem of today's railway - buck passing!

At the end of the day - it is a shambolic mess and needs sorting!
Masboroughlad is offline  
Unread 29th June 2012, 04:20   #8
David10
Member
 
Join Date: 25 May 2012
Location: Manchester
Posts: 385
Default

The Welsh government confirmed a few months ago that £3.5 million has been allocated for the project http://www.networkrailmediacentre.co...egoryID-7.aspx
David10 is offline  
Unread 29th June 2012, 06:59   #9
Joseph_Locke
Member
 
Joseph_Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: 14 Apr 2012
Posts: 252
Default

A contractor has been identified for the works, an agreed design is in place and final contract negotiations are reaching a conclusion.
Joseph_Locke is offline  
Unread 29th June 2012, 08:31   #10
fgwrich
Established Member
 
fgwrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: 15 Apr 2009
Location: The North (Of The South) Of the Southern Great Western!
Posts: 2,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David10 View Post
The Welsh government confirmed a few months ago that £3.5 million has been allocated for the project http://www.networkrailmediacentre.co...egoryID-7.aspx
Good, but i'd like to hope that it would include some part of the restoration and extention of the roof - I last went to Llandudno back in 2009 on one of the UKRailtours trips (in fact, thats 67001 in the press picture too!) and felt that the station was something of a disgrace too, especially for such a rather attractive town with what was once a rather attractive station.

Do we know what actuall work will take place during this refurbishment? As the last time i was up there, there was talk about removing either part of, or in full the original LNWR Spine wall?
fgwrich is offline  
Unread 29th June 2012, 08:58   #11
Clip
Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: 28 Jun 2010
Posts: 2,946
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xplo42 View Post
FYI, the derelict parts of the station (such as the abandoned platform) may not be a part of ATW's property but in fact Network Rail.

I know of several Rail User Groups who have demanded the TOCs to clear the track and/or disused structures at certain locations of rubbish and litter but have received reply that those areas are not a part of the station premises they operate and therefore cannot access. If they want it done they have to contact NR.

All of it is NR property.
Clip is offline  
Unread 29th June 2012, 10:34   #12
Paul Sidorczuk
Xenophon philosopher
Established Member
 
Paul Sidorczuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 17 Apr 2011
Location: Extremely posh, even by Cheshire standards (Better than Alderley Edge or Wilmslow)
Posts: 8,523
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph_Locke View Post
A contractor has been identified for the works, an agreed design is in place and final contract negotiations are reaching a conclusion.
Should nothing untowards occur in the final contract negotiations, what is the time factor to be for completion of the required works ?
__________________
"A cynic, when he smells flowers, looks around for a coffin" -H.L.Mencken.
Sent from my stone monolith using cuneiform and runic symbols.
Paul Sidorczuk is online now  
Unread 29th June 2012, 10:41   #13
jcollins
Established Member
 
Join Date: 23 Jan 2009
Posts: 8,471
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Masboroughlad View Post
Derelict platforms and infrastructure
So if the platforms and infrastructure are surplus to requirements with the current service level what do you think should be done with them?

Should funding be acquired to maintain them instead of spending it elsewhere even though they aren't required?

Should the surplus be removed and then if it is required again in 10 years time spend money putting it all back again instead of just renovating and reinstating what is already there?
__________________
"We apologise for the delay. It is due to some selfish ******* throwing themselves in front of the train." - Andy Parsons.
jcollins is offline  
Unread 29th June 2012, 11:07   #14
Paul Sidorczuk
Xenophon philosopher
Established Member
 
Paul Sidorczuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 17 Apr 2011
Location: Extremely posh, even by Cheshire standards (Better than Alderley Edge or Wilmslow)
Posts: 8,523
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcollins View Post

Should the surplus be removed and then if it is required again in 10 years time spend money putting it all back again instead of just renovating and reinstating what is already there?
I really think you have to go back to the days when Llandudno was served by a very large number of excursion trains, in addition to the service trains, in the days when the vast majority of holidaymakers visiting the resort came by train. That capacity was needed then. Can you envisage any service improvements in the coming years ?

With seaside terminal stations in mind, the same historical case can be applied to Blackpool and in a lesser case, to Scarborough, Morecambe and Southport. Blackpool having more than one terminal station, solved part of the problem by the total eradication of Blackpool Central station with its 14 platforms in 1964.
__________________
"A cynic, when he smells flowers, looks around for a coffin" -H.L.Mencken.
Sent from my stone monolith using cuneiform and runic symbols.
Paul Sidorczuk is online now  
Unread 29th June 2012, 13:17   #15
142094
142 aficionado
Established Member
 
142094's Avatar
 
Join Date: 7 Nov 2009
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 7,721
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clip View Post
All of it is NR property.
However, there will be a certain limit on what ATW can do, and their remit will only cover day to day maintenance and cleaning, whereas Network Rail will be responsible for the bigger works and anything that is on the tracks.
__________________
Stand Clear of the Doors, Please.
142094 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
arriva, atw, disgrace, llandudno, station

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:15.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© RailUK Forums 2005 - the year after 2012