![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 11 Oct 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 7,519
|
Ok, i have heard lots of stuff about HSTs being more effiecent than Voyagers. And wandered. Would an: MTU+8 Mk3s+MTU be more effiecient on a run like Bristol-Plymouth vs a 8-car Voyager? A run that they both do.
There are some MTU figures here: http://therailwaycentre.com/UK%20New...906_43097.html |
|
|
| Sponsored links - Registered users do not see these banners - join today! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: 6 Sep 2005
Location: SPM
Posts: 1,320
|
You will be suprised.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Established Member
Join Date: 7 Jun 2005
Location: Just outside the Black Country
Posts: 2,752
|
In terms of environmental friendliness blah, the MTU wins, purely because it is legal for new builds now, and the QSK19 Cummins engine that the Voyagers, Meridians et al use is now illegal.
__________________
Wibble and piffle. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|