• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Every Tube ticket office to close

Status
Not open for further replies.

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
Is this what they're going to put in the redundant ticket offices?


http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/media/newscentre/29523.aspx

Not just in the old booking offices though - at lots of stations there is still lots of space for retail and the Tesco trial will be their delivery driver sat in the car park waiting for people to pick up their grocerys or whatever from them..

If you look carefully you can still see the old 'Shopping on the underground' stickers in a fair few places.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

island

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
16,106
Location
0036
Looks like there's been two two-day strikes called to protest against the change.
 

IanXC

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
18 Dec 2009
Messages
6,335
I notice that they've already started a limited trial with Asda, where you can order your groceries online by lunchtime and collect them from a van in the station car park on your way home.

You can do this at some of York's Park and Ride sites. I think its fairly well used as I see a van there probably 3 times a week, and that's just the random chance of when I pass by.
 
Joined
11 Jun 2009
Messages
89
I lived in London for 5 years in the 1990s. I don't think I ever got decent service on the LU. Dirty, cramped trains. Rude and obnoxious ticket and gate staff. Sat in a tunnel for minutes without any clue from the driver what is happening. Yet they go off on strike, despite being on the whole, decently paid even for London weighting.

And Bob Crow, another one on a six figure salary, sitting there with his bloody sun tan and fat cigars. The hypocrite.
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
6,549
Location
UK
* Perhaps some enterprising travel companies would not just seek to offer to sell an Oyster to people about to visit Britain, but a prepaid contact less card that can be used for travel, making small purchases in shops, vending machines etc - while offering the tourist some extra security. Such a card could then easily be topped up, perhaps at an ATM or in shops that can top up other accounts.

I'm after a prepaid card for my trip to france they give better exchange rates too :D
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
12,621
Location
Yorkshire
I lived in London for 5 years in the 1990s. I don't think I ever got decent service on the LU. Dirty, cramped trains. Rude and obnoxious ticket and gate staff. Sat in a tunnel for minutes without any clue from the driver what is happening. Yet they go off on strike, despite being on the whole, decently paid even for London weighting.

And I'd say they've improved enormously since then. And are decently paid because they have decent union representation. Compare and contrast with bus drivers.

And Bob Crow, another one on a six figure salary, sitting there with his bloody sun tan and fat cigars. The hypocrite.

Is he not allowed to have a holiday?

He's not making the TSSA strike. Or forcing his members to vote to strike. For those who are complaining that only 30% of the members voted for strike action presumably anyone who felt strong that they didn't want to strike was perfectly capable of voting to say that.

Boris might want to remember he was first choice of 44% of the voters on a turnout of 38.1% which I make as getting 17% of the vote.
 
Last edited:

ModernRailways

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2011
Messages
2,049
I lived in London for 5 years in the 1990s. I don't think I ever got decent service on the LU. Dirty, cramped trains. Rude and obnoxious ticket and gate staff. Sat in a tunnel for minutes without any clue from the driver what is happening. Yet they go off on strike, despite being on the whole, decently paid even for London weighting.

And Bob Crow, another one on a six figure salary, sitting there with his bloody sun tan and fat cigars. The hypocrite.

It's changed quite a bit since the 1990s...

Most staff are very friendly, you may catch one or two in a bad mood but generally they are some of the best.

Drivers give an announcement if you've been stopped for 30 seconds - most drivers do it immediately though which does make them look rather silly when they say something like 'We're just being held at a red signal and should be on the move shortly', with the train starting to move in the middle of that. Sometimes you get a little joke after it though saying something like 'Well, that was quicker than expected'.

Staff are paid the right wage for what they do. There hours are antisocial for the most part, they have to remember quite a lot of information and most of all if something goes wrong they are the ones who know what to do.
 
Joined
11 Jun 2009
Messages
89
And I'd say they've improved enormously since then. And are decently paid because they have decent union representation. Compare and contrast with bus drivers.



He's not making the TSSA strike. Or forcing his members to vote to strike. For those who are complaining that only 30% of the members voted for strike action presumably anyone who felt strong that they didn't want to strike was perfectly capable of voting to say that.

Boris might want to remember he was first choice of 44% of the voters on a turnout of 38.1% which I make as getting 17% of the vote.

Bob won't be losing 2 days pay will he.....?
 

A-driver

Established Member
Joined
9 May 2011
Messages
4,482
Bob won't be losing 2 days pay will he.....?


So what? The members decided to vote yes-if they didn't think this was worth loosing wages for they could have voted no. What the union leader is paid is irrelevant. The power of the union comes from it's membership-not its leaders.
 

A-driver

Established Member
Joined
9 May 2011
Messages
4,482
If you are going to argue that bob crow should loose out on pay whilst protecting his members then don't you think it fair that in order to reduce this funding shortage responsible for the 950 job cuts that those at the top such as Boris and the TFL senior management reduce their wages putting the money back in the pot before letting any staff go? I'm sure they could live on less where as those facing redundancy arnt going to have to consider downsizing one of their houses or only drinking fine wines on a Friday night, they are facing the prospect of loosing the roof over their heads, struggling to put food on the table and a real possibility of their family disintegrating because of this...
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
I'm sure they could live on less where as those facing redundancy arnt going to have to consider downsizing one of their houses or only drinking fine wines on a Friday night, they are facing the prospect of loosing the roof over their heads, struggling to put food on the table and a real possibility of their family disintegrating because of this...

But remember they have said that there will be no compulsory redundancies so there is no prospect of what you have outlined above will there?

And so far they have recieved 450 applications for Voluntary redundancy which is over half of the 750 jobs they say they want to get rid of.
 

A-driver

Established Member
Joined
9 May 2011
Messages
4,482
But remember they have said that there will be no compulsory redundancies so there is no prospect of what you have outlined above will there?



And so far they have recieved 450 applications for Voluntary redundancy which is over half of the 750 jobs they say they want to get rid of.


Are you just naive or slightly dim to believe that...?

No compulsory redundancies. But what they will do instead is offer displaced staff the opportunity to apply for other positions. So they can join the agencies who supply cleaning staff. They will loose all their yearns and conditions and take a dramatic pay cut-not far off redundancy infact-and that will also put huge pressure on families who won't be able to afford their rent or mortgage any more etc...

And then once they start in the new jobs or with the agency with less t&cs etc they can start cutting jobs there. Meanwhile Boris and friends continue to enjoy their incredibly generous pay at the expense of those who will have their lives turned upside down.

And please confirm-are you saying 750 redundancies is acceptable then?
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
I didnt say anything was acceptable did I ? unless you are reading too much into what I wrote which you probably are.

I am neither naive nor slightly dim thanks but its nice of you to ask in such a derogative and demeaning way just because I havent thrown my hands up in disgust at the prospect of job losses. But I wont let it worry me, so please dont let it worry you, because sticking up for and being nice to yoru fellow worker only applies if they agree wiht what you are saying doesnt it, or else it all gets thrown out the pram and then you can try and throw insults around


Well done you.
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
12,621
Location
Yorkshire
But remember they have said that there will be no compulsory redundancies so there is no prospect of what you have outlined above will there?

And so far they have recieved 450 applications for Voluntary redundancy which is over half of the 750 jobs they say they want to get rid of.

Let's assume that's true and there are no compulsory redundancies.

A large number of people will drop from grade CSA1 to CSA2. If they haven't managed to progress back to their original grade in 3 years (and there will be more competition for fewer roles) they'll drop from £29k to £23k.
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
Let's assume that's true and there are no compulsory redundancies.

A large number of people will drop from grade CSA1 to CSA2. If they haven't managed to progress back to their original grade in 3 years (and there will be more competition for fewer roles) they'll drop from £29k to £23k.

And that is the more serious issue here rather than ranting and raving about job losses and being called dim or naive(of course if I am that to only believe what TfL have to say then what wbout those who only believe what the RMT say - both have agendas do they not so surely it would be dim and naive to believe either wouldnt it? Nah, I couldnt give him that much credit for even being half that clever not to know this). The drop in the grade will undoubtably cause people some issues and that will need to be adressed somehow and is a far better talking point. Though I hadnt actually read about them dropping a gradde because the only thing the unions have shouted about in the news-or that which has been prionted or shown - has been the job losses.

So why hasnt the prospect of dropping grades been highlighted more?
 

A-driver

Established Member
Joined
9 May 2011
Messages
4,482
I didnt say anything was acceptable did I ? unless you are reading too much into what I wrote which you probably are.



I am neither naive nor slightly dim thanks but its nice of you to ask in such a derogative and demeaning way just because I havent thrown my hands up in disgust at the prospect of job losses. But I wont let it worry me, so please dont let it worry you, because sticking up for and being nice to yoru fellow worker only applies if they agree wiht what you are saying doesnt it, or else it all gets thrown out the pram and then you can try and throw insults around





Well done you.


Hang on...you said that they have said there will be no compulsory redundancies and so there is no prospect of the hardship I described from happening didn't you? If you are unsure then please re-read the post if your which I quoted...

Therefore, having said that, it appears that you are believing what TFL/Boris have said and you disagree with me that it will cause great stress and hardship on families whilst those at the top don't see a dent in their money.

If I have misread your post then please explain what exactly you meant to me and I will gladly withdraw my comments!

And by the way - I don't take the union side as gospel, but I can see it from both sides. Most people in the press at the moment are only seeing TfLs points and believing the union are being unreasonable. I am seeing this from both sides, not just from the RMT.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,046
Location
UK
I lived in London for 5 years in the 1990s. I don't think I ever got decent service on the LU. Dirty, cramped trains. Rude and obnoxious ticket and gate staff. Sat in a tunnel for minutes without any clue from the driver what is happening. Yet they go off on strike, despite being on the whole, decently paid even for London weighting.

And Bob Crow, another one on a six figure salary, sitting there with his bloody sun tan and fat cigars. The hypocrite.

I have my own opinions on Bob Crow and don't think this strike is worth anything, but should point out that since the 1990s most lines now have new or refurbished stock, and drivers now tell you what's happening within seconds. In fact, they'll apologise for sitting at a red signal in about 10 seconds - even though it's quite normal to sit at a red signal (especially in the peak, when idiot commuters try and hold a packed train for an hour when there's an emptier one just outside the station waiting to come in, which is the held up, as is the one behind...).

And gateline staff? Never seen a rude one yet, and if anything they're far too quick to just let people in/out even if they have a problem with their ticket (as against revenue staff, obviously). I'd say the focus on customer service has changed somewhat in the last 20-odd years.

Trust me, give it another go and you'll see a massive transformation. Obviously you'll still see people huffing and puffing and cursing and abusing staff.
 

joeykins82

Member
Joined
24 Jul 2012
Messages
601
Location
London
So why hasnt the prospect of dropping grades been highlighted more?
Because the trade unions' equivalents of corporate communications departments are pretty amateur based on my proofreading of their press releases, and also because the majority of the press has a strong right-wing bias and will spin the story in whatever way Boris and TfL prefer.
Insightful stuff here:
http://www.londonreconnections.com/2013/big-changes-gonna-come-part-2-new-approach-ticket-sales/
http://aslefshrugged.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/okay-ive-been-looking-at-proposals-for.html
http://aslefshrugged.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/and-so-we-stumble-towards-strike-like.html
 
Joined
19 Jan 2013
Messages
16
Because the trade unions' equivalents of corporate communications departments are pretty amateur based on my proofreading of their press releases, and also because the majority of the press has a strong right-wing bias and will spin the story in whatever way Boris and TfL prefer.
Insightful stuff here:
http://www.londonreconnections.com/2013/big-changes-gonna-come-part-2-new-approach-ticket-sales/
http://aslefshrugged.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/okay-ive-been-looking-at-proposals-for.html
http://aslefshrugged.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/and-so-we-stumble-towards-strike-like.html

I have been very disappointed with the bias shown toward Boris Johnson in the media, the man is dangerous.
 
Joined
19 Jan 2013
Messages
16

Quite wishy-washy but nevertheless balanced.

Anyone care to speculate whether next weeks planned strike will go ahead? This week really was a pig, not only was the tube disrupted due to the strikes but London Overground had severe delays at various points, the weather was atrocious and the Blackwall tunnel was also closed at least once during the two days.

At first I was not sure if I agreed with the strikes or not, however I believe politicians are dangerous people and if one/several of them were in charge of the company I work for I would want to make sure in no uncertain terms that I would not be bullied by them even the smallest bit. Who knows what they might try to do next.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,164
Location
Somewhere, not in London
Well, they're also trying to re-grade the payscales of all non operational staff in the orginisation that in real terms is an indefinate pay freeze until further notice, with the usual coverup and media domination by those in Employee Relations that results in no-one outside of union representitives and those laying out the plans even having a chance of understanding them...

(See TSSA Website)
 

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,018
Well, they're also trying to re-grade the payscales of all non operational staff in the orginisation that in real terms is an indefinate pay freeze until further notice, with the usual coverup and media domination by those in Employee Relations that results in no-one outside of union representitives and those laying out the plans even having a chance of understanding them...

(See TSSA Website)
In fact I had forgotten that the TSSA was on strike too. The media portrayal (such as in the none-too-serious this BBC article) was one of "Boris v Bob".
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
20,391
Location
0035
In fact I had forgotten that the TSSA was on strike too. The media portrayal (such as in the none-too-serious this BBC article) was one of "Boris v Bob".
RMT members in TfL were also on strike as well as RMT and Tssa on the Underground. Whilst RMT in TfL is a fairly minor player, some of the TfL employees that went out were those in the Travel Information Centres (i.e. those locations that are poised to act as replacements when LU ticket windows are closed).
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,046
Location
UK
When I went through King's Cross on Thursday, the ticket office was closed in the northern ticket hall and there were loads of staff by the gates. Lots of people were using the ticket machines (with some assistance), and it didn't appear to be much a problem (helped also by the clear information given on poster boards as well as the LCD displays showing the special services in operation for the appropriate lines).

Sad to say but in some ways, it actually demonstrated to me that without the ticket offices the whole of the station (and perhaps many others) wouldn't grind to a halt, while having more staff walking around is actually no bad thing.

Perhaps the unions should be mindful of this!
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,164
Location
Somewhere, not in London
Sad to say but in some ways, it actually demonstrated to me that without the ticket offices the whole of the station (and perhaps many others) wouldn't grind to a halt, while having more staff walking around is actually no bad thing.

Perhaps the unions should be mindful of this!

But where is it all these extra staff will come from when all the ticket office staff are gone? the 500odd who stay will be one or two extra staff at any one time on the floor. Just how many extra staff where there in the Northern Ticket Hall? I somewhat dowbt it tallies with them who would come out of the ticket offices.

One cannot rely on the likes of volunteers and SRT (like they do at the moment in the case of SRT at major stations) to ram a load of extra staff in every station all the time, the reality is you'll notice very little in the way of additional staff on the gatelines and POMs if TfL's plans came to fruition.
 

A-driver

Established Member
Joined
9 May 2011
Messages
4,482
When I went through King's Cross on Thursday, the ticket office was closed in the northern ticket hall and there were loads of staff by the gates. Lots of people were using the ticket machines (with some assistance), and it didn't appear to be much a problem (helped also by the clear information given on poster boards as well as the LCD displays showing the special services in operation for the appropriate lines).

Sad to say but in some ways, it actually demonstrated to me that without the ticket offices the whole of the station (and perhaps many others) wouldn't grind to a halt, while having more staff walking around is actually no bad thing.

Perhaps the unions should be mindful of this!



But where is it all these extra staff will come from when all the ticket office staff are gone? the 500odd who stay will be one or two extra staff at any one time on the floor. Just how many extra staff where there in the Northern Ticket Hall? I somewhat dowbt it tallies with them who would come out of the ticket offices.



One cannot rely on the likes of volunteers and SRT (like they do at the moment in the case of SRT at major stations) to ram a load of extra staff in every station all the time, the reality is you'll notice very little in the way of additional staff on the gatelines and POMs if TfL's plans came to fruition.


To add to 'Nym's post, you went there on a strike day-a day when many people were avoiding the tube and either working from home or using other methods to get to work. It's only a fair comparison if you see what happens with a 'normal' volume of people going through whilst ticket offices are shut and without volunteers bolstering staff numbers. There won't be that amount of staff on the gates in normal operation after the cuts have been made.
 

Wyvern

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2009
Messages
1,573
For what it's worth here is an extract from an article by someone outside the railway:

ANOTHER ANGRY VOICE: Boris Johnson's Tube strike hypocrisy

. . . Aside from the grotesque hypocrisy of a man that was elected on a turnout of 38% saying that others must ensure a turnout of at least 50% for legitimacy, there are plenty of other criticisms of this proposal to further undermine workers' rights.

One of the most obvious criticisms is of the Tory claims that the Underground workers are "holding London to ransom". There is another way to look at this issue. If Boris Johnson hadn't broken his pre-election manifesto pledge to ensure that "there is always a manned ticket office in every station" then London Underground staff wouldn't be striking over the issue. It is not the unions that are holding London to ransom, it is Boris Johnson and TfL doing it with their hugely unpopular austerity agenda.

his constant references to Bob Crow's salary of £145,000 per year. This may seem like an awful lot, but it is absolutely dwarfed by the salary and bonuses of Boris Johnson's mate Peter Hendy, the TfL commissioner, which amounted to £652,452 last year. The total annual cost of Transport for London staff earning over £100,000 per year was an eye-watering £46 million last year. Maybe they should have looked at imposing a bit of austerity on their own salaries before rolling out their plan to sack hundreds of low paid workers and leave London's tube stations bereft of staff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top