ac6000cw
Established Member
Could this be it's onward travels (to Willesden Brent Sds)? - http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O21003/2014/08/05/advanced
Could this be it's onward travels (to Willesden Brent Sds)? - http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O21003/2014/08/05/advanced
Its running at 0Z47 so it could be a 47 move
I suspect the generators are more about reducing fuel costs (allowing the loco to be shut down) than noise, so I assume they will stay.
Don't move next to a Railway then if you don't want to hear trains
Could this be it's onward travels (to Willesden Brent Sds)? - http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O21003/2014/08/05/advanced
Its running at 0Z47 so it could be a 47 move or it could be the 68.
Have just spotted this STP movement on Real Time Trains from Rugby to Crewe Gresty Bridge and wondered if it may be a 68? Not a clue, but thought I would ask anyway
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O21328/2014/08/06/advanced
Probably more likely to be a 57 Thunderbird ? (DRS provide all the WCML ones now)
This was a 47 move. 68004 came to Crown Point for fuel around 3pm today and then returned to Norwich station. It was still there at 8pm.
First time seeing one in the metal and they look quite good.
Bring on the Chiltern 68s
I have to kind of agree with you. When I saw photos of them I thought they were a bit weird looking but after seing a few on the West Coast they do look quite good and DRS have done well with their new livery.
I'm also waiting for the Chiltern 68's. Don't think I am going to be able to get all the Chiltern 67's before they change over but as soon as possible I will be starting on the 68's.
If it's of any interest,a DRS Class 68 was out and about on the Fen Line last week as one of my colleagues spotted it running light engine though Downham Market.
Not sure on the loco number though sorry
I think they will need to complete the 68 add-on option for 68016-68025 first as they have to be delivered before the end of the year as they are only IIIA compliant.I suspect we should be seeing some development on the 88s soon.
I would agree too. My only problem with the design is they look like beasts - as in they look like a strong loco to pull big heavy loads - and to me that lets them down. I just don't think they would look right when pulling a rake of MK3s. I think it's why I really like the Class 70, it's a powerful workhorse to pull big heavy loads and is built like a beast. I just think they don't look suited to their actual role.
It's probably just me thinking that though.
Depends on your definition of beasts - With the bulging cheeks and rhomboid side windows - I was thinking Hamster,Gerbil,Chipmunk