. . . . full fiscal autonomy . . . .
Considering that Scotland is a net benefactor of the Barnet formula it could result in huge tax rises or spending cuts north of the border. Considering how left leaning the SNP are it is more likely to mean tax rises. IMO the SNP should realise that Scotland benefits from the Barnet formula, and accept the devolution that is on offer from the Smith commission.
Just to be sure that I understand your question correctly, are you asserting that the united nations of just Northern Ireland, Wales and England will hugely benefit financially from the separation of Scotland from the UK?
And if not, why would independence necessarily lead to tax rises or spending cuts?
Of course Scotland can afford full autonomy or full independence, I don't see how any reasonable person can argue otherwise.
My issue is that I'm far from convinced by the SNPs view that Scotland could afford everything on its shopping list at the same time as not putting up taxes to pay for it all.
I have similar issues with Unionists that seem to claim the opposite that Scotland would end up being some third world hell hole and completely broke if it left the UK.
I agree, though I have never, and will not in the future, feel any urge to make a connection between a political aspiration and reality. Their 'shopping list' is impressive, and some of their achievements to date are equally impressive (such as the speedy enactment of the
Adults with Incapacity Act). What I would need to see before making any comparitive assessment is England's realistic 'shopping list' and its adjustments following Scottish independence.