Here are two prosecutions reported in the Leicester Mercury newspaper yesterday.
I am guessing there were a couple of differences with the two offences for them to be fined differently.
*** Male age 36 was found guilty in his absence of travelling by rail between London St Pancras and Leicester on September 18th without a valid ticket. He was fined £220 with £79.50 compensation, a £22 victim surcharge and £135 costs. (£456.50)
**** female age 20 was proved guilty of travelling by rail between London St Pancras and Market Harborough without paying a £79.50 fare on October 28th. She was fined £440 and told to pay £79.50 compensation.(£519.50)
I am guessing there were a couple of differences with the two offences for them to be fined differently.
Last edited by a moderator: