• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

West Midlands Franchise ITT released by DfT

Status
Not open for further replies.

plcd1

Member
Joined
23 May 2015
Messages
788
And the DfT have released details of the ITT for the new West Midlands franchise.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/better-journeys-on-the-way-for-rail-passengers-across-the-west-midlands

Rail passengers across the West Midlands network are set for better journeys with a host of extra services and benefits under plans announced today (30 August 2016) by Rail Minister Paul Maynard.

Bidders for the new franchise will be required to deliver hundreds of extra services, new ticketing options and much increased capacity. The publication of the invitation to tender details the minimum level of improvements bidders hoping to secure the next franchise will need to include in their detailed proposals.

Benefits will include:

space for more than 20,000 additional passengers to travel into London and Birmingham in the morning peak though the introduction of longer trains
more than 300 extra Sunday services across the franchise by 2021, including 50 new services in each direction between Birmingham and Longbridge and the same between Birmingham and Sutton Coldfield

more evening services from Birmingham to Lichfield City, Bromsgrove, Kidderminster, Whitlocks End and Dorridge and later Saturday last services from Birmingham to Wolverhampton, Bromsgrove and Liverpool

a new hourly service from Birmingham and Wolverhampton to Crewe via Stafford and Stoke-on-Trent

free Wi-Fi on all main line services by the end of 2019

new ticket options for part time travellers which provide better value options for customers who travel fewer than 5 days a week

new direct peak time services between Walsall and London

Additionally there will also be a requirement for bidders to provide at least 60 apprenticeships as part of the franchise.

Rail Minister Paul Maynard said:

We are making the biggest investment in the railways since the Victorian era and today marks a key step forward in giving passengers better journeys across the West Midlands and beyond.

This franchise serves both commuters and long distance passengers and these benefits will deliver extra and smoother journeys for customers using these services.

The current franchise is operated by London Midland and covers a combination of commuting and long-distance services spanning the Midlands, south-east and north-west as well as services to London Euston and Liverpool Lime Street.

West Midlands Rail Ltd (WMR), which has been set up by the 14 Metropolitan, Shire and Unitary authorities from across the wider West Midlands, has worked collaboratively with the Department for Transport (DfT) to design, specify and manage the new franchise.

Councillor Mark Winnington, WMR Chair and leader of Staffordshire County Council, said:

Today’s announcement is a game changer in that it is the first time the West Midlands has had this level of involvement in shaping what a train company has to deliver for local passengers.

The region has come together to grab this devolution opportunity with both hands and we believe that together with the Department for Transport we have set out a railway that brings real benefits not only for passengers but also for local businesses, supporting economic growth and jobs.

The authorities of the West Midlands are united in this and believe the region better understands what it needs from its railway and that having greater responsibility for its management is good for passengers, good for the economy and good for taxpayers.

Bidders are encouraged to include proposals for additional benefits over and above the minimum requirements published today. It follows an extensive public consultation which attracted almost 2000 responses.

The shortlisted bidders for the franchise are:

London and West Midlands Railway Limited, a subsidiary of Govia Limited (a joint venture between Keolis and Go-Ahead Group)

West Midlands Trains Limited, currently a wholly owned subsidiary of Abellio Transport Group Limited with East Japan Railway Company and Mitsui & Co Limited as minority partners

Bidders for the West Midlands franchise have until 29 November 2016 to submit their bids, with the new operator planned to take over the franchise in October 2017.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,631
Location
Redcar
This has now been released there is an extract below and the link to the page with more is here:

DfT said:
Rail passengers across the West Midlands network are set for better journeys with a host of extra services and benefits under plans announced today (30 August 2016) by Rail Minister Paul Maynard.

Bidders for the new franchise will be required to deliver hundreds of extra services, new ticketing options and much increased capacity. The publication of the invitation to tender details the minimum level of improvements bidders hoping to secure the next franchise will need to include in their detailed proposals.

Benefits will include:

  • space for more than 20,000 additional passengers to travel into London and Birmingham in the morning peak though the introduction of longer trains
  • more than 300 extra Sunday services across the franchise by 2021, including 50 new services in each direction between Birmingham and Longbridge and the same between Birmingham and Sutton Coldfield
  • more evening services from Birmingham to Lichfield City, Bromsgrove, Kidderminster, Whitlocks End and Dorridge and later Saturday last services from Birmingham to Wolverhampton, Bromsgrove and Liverpool
  • a new hourly service from Birmingham and Wolverhampton to Crewe via Stafford and Stoke-on-Trent
  • free Wi-Fi on all main line services by the end of 2019
  • new ticket options for part time travellers which provide better value options for customers who travel fewer than 5 days a week
  • new direct peak time services between Walsall and London

...

The shortlisted bidders for the franchise are:
  • London and West Midlands Railway Limited, a subsidiary of Govia Limited (a joint venture between Keolis and Go-Ahead Group)
  • West Midlands Trains Limited, currently a wholly owned subsidiary of Abellio Transport Group Limited with East Japan Railway Company and Mitsui & Co Limited as minority partners

Bidders for the West Midlands franchise have until 29 November 2016 to submit their bids, with the new operator planned to take over the franchise in October 2017.
 

pemma

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
31,474
Location
Knutsford
It seems bidders can propose using any EMUs which will become available such as the Northern 323s and TPE 350s but for DMUs it's a case of what they'll be left with by the current franchise unless DfT tell bidders otherwise or bidders propose using new stock.

I notice they've asked for bidders to consider alternatives to 3+2 seating on the Cross City line.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I notice that in the spreadsheets there is no minimum service requirement for the Marston Vale branch, i.e. no services are required to be operated at all.

Is this a possible precursor to it being transferred elsewhere, maybe Chiltern, for East West Rail?
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,382
Here we go again:
ITT page 71
5.6.9 The Department requires a Franchisee who will ensure that for any new-build rolling stock
:
a) The fleet is fitted with the equipment necessary to enable the trains to be operated under Driver Controlled Operation (DCO) in passenger service without any additional station facilities other than lighting being required; and
 

greatkingrat

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
2,764
I notice that in the spreadsheets there is no minimum service requirement for the Marston Vale branch, i.e. no services are required to be operated at all.

Is this a possible precursor to it being transferred elsewhere, maybe Chiltern, for East West Rail?

I think you were looking at the Sunday service spreadsheet (attachment A part 2)?
 
Joined
25 Jan 2016
Messages
544
Location
Wolverhampton
I was quite pleased with it until seeing the briefing document and consultation response, specifically page 78 and it stating Wolverhampton will be transferred from VTWC to the winner of the Franchise competition.

Surely a grave indication of Wolves losing ICWC services in the coming franchise contest...
 

Attachments

  • Hmm....png
    Hmm....png
    63.9 KB · Views: 159

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
It also reads to me that south WCML fasts that call at Leighton must also call at Bletchley (at present most do not). If that's true, that is a very welcome enhancement for us Bletchleyites.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Surely a grave indication of Wolves losing ICWC services in the coming franchise contest...

I doubt it - it's just that with 1tph in each direction they aren't even nearly the main operator.
 

FordFocus

Member
Joined
15 Apr 2015
Messages
918
Here we go again:
ITT page 71

DCO will be the norm for any franchise ITT now. It shouldn't come as surprise to anyone, even LM guards.

A quick glance through the ITT and there seems to be little improvement to Snow Hill passengers. The rumoured transfer of Statford-upon-Avon to Leamington services from Chiltern doesn't look to be included.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
And...

As per
subsection
5.5.5
of Delivery Plan 2.1
we require bidders to
submit a
Priced Option
for each of
:
(i) The reinstatement
of services at Barlaston station;
(ii) The reinstatement of services at
Wedgwood station.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I also wonder what happened to this in the Stakeholder Briefing?

A new Sunday service for the Marston Vale line and Acton Bridge station

Got cold feet?
 

ScotTrains

Member
Joined
13 Nov 2014
Messages
376
Location
Scotland
It's a shame there isn't a requirement to improve on-board catering and first class provision especially on their longer routes.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
5.48
The franchisee will need to provide a quick and simple Delay Repay compensation
system for passengers. This will include a requirement to provide compensation for
delays of 15 minutes or more. The new operator will have to actively promote to
passengers how they can claim compensation due to delays

15 minutes? That's quite a significant move.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
8,686
I was quite pleased with it until seeing the briefing document and consultation response, specifically page 78 and it stating Wolverhampton will be transferred from VTWC to the winner of the Franchise competition.

Surely a grave indication of Wolves losing ICWC services in the coming franchise contest...

The station control by Virgin probably goes back to the days of 1ph to Scotland. 1tph to Birmingham and a terminating service every hour to London Euston. Services have changed now so actually Virgin are a very minor operator of the station.

For me there is no benefit in not Stopping the Birmingham Scotland trains there so i doubt it will lose ICWC services.
 

ChrisHogan

Member
Joined
15 Jan 2016
Messages
342
There seems to be mistakes in the documents "West Midlands franchise: train service specification,

Another mistake is on page 23 of the SLC where it specifies a Saturday evening late service from New Street to stourbridge calling at Jewellery Quarter!
 

pemma

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
31,474
Location
Knutsford
From working out the confusing spreadsheet names Hartford is getting 2tph from TSR2 (December 2018.)
 

BHXDMT

Member
Joined
18 Feb 2011
Messages
276
Location
England
Mention of a new hourly Birmingham to Crewe via Stoke, where are the paths for that coming from between Birmingham and Wolverhampton? Or is it going to take the form of one of the Liverpool's running via Stoke?
 

Redonian

Member
Joined
31 May 2014
Messages
95
Mention of a new hourly Birmingham to Crewe via Stoke, where are the paths for that coming from between Birmingham and Wolverhampton? Or is it going to take the form of one of the Liverpool's running via Stoke?

Probably one of the Liverpool's going via Stoke and the Euston - Crewe going direct to Crewe from Stafford.
 

pemma

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
31,474
Location
Knutsford
Probably one of the Liverpool's going via Stoke and the Euston - Crewe going direct to Crewe from Stafford.

See diagram page 23: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploa...iefing-document-and-consultation-response.pdf

Birmingham to Wolverhampton local extended to Crewe via Stoke. Euston to Crewe service routed away from Stoke, Birmingham to Liverpools remain on same route with revised stopping pattern.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
15 minutes? That's quite a significant move.

Especially if it includes missed connections.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
That says DCO has to be possible using any new build stock, not that LM must implement DCO, it's called future proofing.

Indeed, one of the biggest responses in the consultation document was in favour of making on-train staff/guards more visible. I have a feeling they would not have published that statistic were DOO on the cards.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
For the umpteenth time DOO does not mean no other staff on board and indeed if Guards aren't operating the doors they have more time to spend with the rest of the passengers on the train.
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
For the umpteenth time DOO does not mean no other staff on board and indeed if Guards aren't operating the doors they have more time to spend with the rest of the passengers on the train.

And also for the umpteenth time, DOO means that the guards aren't necessary for the operation of the train and can be dropped relatively easily should the franchise run into financial issues/DfT says so.
 

pemma

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
31,474
Location
Knutsford
Can we discuss the other things in the ITT especially considering no-one has found any reference to a requirement for DOO or DCO to be implemented?
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,631
Location
Redcar
This is not a thread for discussing DOO. Any further posts on that subect in this thread will be deleted as off-topic without any warning.
 
Joined
5 Aug 2011
Messages
779
Not had chance to read it al yet, but is there any indication of services transferring from other franchises e.g. the Shrewsbury-Crewe stopper from the Wales and Borders franchise?
 

ScotTrains

Member
Joined
13 Nov 2014
Messages
376
Location
Scotland
I was quite pleased with it until seeing the briefing document and consultation response, specifically page 78 and it stating Wolverhampton will be transferred from VTWC to the winner of the Franchise competition.

Surely a grave indication of Wolves losing ICWC services in the coming franchise contest...

Will the first class lounge at Wolverhampton be transferring to the new operator or will it remain a VTWC one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top