It also helps Cross Country when there is a problem around Bristol.
Originally, the Gloucester to Golden Valley push-pull trains were fairly well-used and it seems surprising that there is no animus to re-institute them and the 'haltes', especially as Gloucester Central really is central. Does anyone have local knowledge that would support this idea?
I'm sure a better service will be provided in the near future, especially as now the Turbos have been introduced on the line and the IETs will be introduced soon.
The franchise spec talked about peak time Turbo extras in addition to hourly IETs but seemed to suggest for people commuting to Gloucester rather than Swindon
Originally, the Gloucester to Golden Valley push-pull trains were fairly well-used and it seems surprising that there is no animus to re-institute them and the 'haltes', especially as Gloucester Central really is central. Does anyone have local knowledge that would support this idea?
I understand there were some minor speed improvements too?
If they were to look at opening stations on this line I would suggest a couple of stations to cover the commuter traffic in Swindon & Gloucester
Swindon would be easier, a station close to where Purton Road, crosses the line, it will have good links to north & west Swindon so will work for commuter traffic - including to London
Gloucester is trickier, something around Quedgeley would be the best location - residential area, close to a main road (A38) & there's land close by - however, this is on the main line between Bristol & Birmingham, would that cause issues if there are regular stopping trains here? (someone in the industry would know better than me)
I like your thinking.Slightly OT but I personally would like to see a station provided in the Hunts Grove area as a Gloucester South Parkway. It could act in the same way as Bristol Parkway does when the Severn Tunnel is closed for maintenance and GWR services between Swansea and London divert via Gloucester. Passengers could then change onto XC services to/from the Midlands and points further north relatively easily. At present passengers have to be bussed between Newport and Bristol Parkway or use the limited capacity Turbostars between Cardiff and Birmingham during any closures.
This would be better achieved I think if there were a fast service between Gloucester and Bristol that connected reasonably with Golden Valley line trains. The difference between a fast train and a stopping train is quite significant, 36 minutes vs 51.It’s a pretty big double-back geographically, but journey times would still be roughly comparable to driving - around 1hr15 from Stroud to Temple Meads.
That's right, plus the extra peak trains into Gloucester in the mornings and back the other way in late afternoon mentioned above, which presumably will run from the start of next year.
The initial poster may have been envisioning a 30-minute frequency of hourly IETs plus hourly Swindon-Gloucester/Cheltenham Turbos all day.
Are you envisioning a single route from Cardiff Central to Swindon via Gloucester, or 2 routes between Swindon & Gloucester & Cardiff & Gloucester?I’d like to think that might happen one day. Preferably with the turbos starting back from Cardiff. Providing a half hourly service for Caldicot, Chepstow, Lydney, Stonehouse, Stroud and Kemble all day. And speed up the XC trains again between Newport and Gloucester.
Are you envisioning a single route from Cardiff Central to Swindon via Gloucester, or 2 routes between Swindon & Gloucester & Cardiff & Gloucester?
This would make more use of platform 2 at Swindon which will be underutilised once all trains from Cheltenham go to Paddington
However I doubt Gloucester (Central) will be happy losing its direct trains to London.In the next 10 years, Network Rail plan to make it a 2tph frequency between Paddington and Cheltenham (two not calling at Gloucester). However, if plans for a South Gloucester Parkway emerge all London trains will call there instead of Gloucester Central.
In the next 10 years, Network Rail plan to make it a 2tph frequency between Paddington and Cheltenham (two not calling at Gloucester). However, if plans for a South Gloucester Parkway emerge all London trains will call there instead of Gloucester Central.
If that is the plan then surely one of the trains has to run fast to Swindon, it would seem an incredibly strange decision for each Gloucester and Cheltenham to have 1tph to London whilst Stonehouse has 2.