• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Football

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,671
Location
Another planet...
Yeah sorry I do mean Peter Clarke, not sure why name him Paul. :oops: Rumours is Clarke doesn't fancy become Latics new manager anyway so seem like he continued playing football for Oldham next season. (Unless he sign for Bury again that is)
As captain for Huddersfield Peter Clarke was a great leader on the field- the sort of player you'd expect to do well as a manager under the right circumstances.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,857
As captain for Huddersfield Peter Clarke was a great leader on the field- the sort of player you'd expect to do well as a manager under the right circumstances.

Though it is also true that some of the best players on the pitch translate poorly as managers - see Ally McCoist, Tony Adams, Teddy Sheringham; one that comes to mind to me as a Rovers fan is Henning Berg. Indeed some of the best managers around had little to nothing by way of a professional career.
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,777
Location
Devon
Though it is also true that some of the best players on the pitch translate poorly as managers - see Ally McCoist, Tony Adams, Teddy Sheringham; one that comes to mind to me as a Rovers fan is Henning Berg. Indeed some of the best managers around had little to nothing by way of a professional career.
Yep. It’s a very different skill set which some players may or may not have.
Making a good manager just because you’re a good pundit being another one...
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,671
Location
Another planet...
Yep. It’s a very different skill set which some players may or may not have.
Making a good manager just because you’re a good pundit being another one...
Though usually the pundit angle is only explored once they've failed as managers. Alan Shearer being an example, one which also demonstrates that with punditry being rubbish isn't a barrier! The same doesn't apply to coaching quite as much.
 

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,209
Location
No longer here
Which goes to prove what a load of rollocks the honours system is. Pop stars, football players, actresses all getting a gong for doing their job. The coxswain on our lifeboat is worth twenty of them and he hasn't got a gong.

Probably goes to prove how little you know about Kenny Dalglish or why he got knighted. He wasn’t awarded the knighthood for being the manager of a football team.
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,323
Location
Stirlingshire
Though it is also true that some of the best players on the pitch translate poorly as managers - see Ally McCoist, Tony Adams, Teddy Sheringham; one that comes to mind to me as a Rovers fan is Henning Berg. Indeed some of the best managers around had little to nothing by way of a professional career.

One of the most notable "failures" was probably Bobby Charlton at Preston, unlike his brother Jackie, not as good a player but a much better Manager.
 

greyman42

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2017
Messages
4,940
Though usually the pundit angle is only explored once they've failed as managers. Alan Shearer being an example, one which also demonstrates that with punditry being rubbish isn't a barrier! The same doesn't apply to coaching quite as much.
Alan Shearer was only a manager for 8 matches so I don't think that's enough to class him as a failure.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,671
Location
Another planet...

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
10,678
Location
Redcar
This is quite a biggie. Some of you will know that yesterday, the Spain manager Julen Lopetegui had agreed to take over at Real Madrid after the World Cup. Now he won't have to wait, Spain have sacked him 24 hours before the World Cup starts! Turns out they weren't informed until 5 minutes before it was announced and were less than pleased.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/44467548

Spain sacked head coach Julen Lopetegui after he was named the new Real Madrid boss - two days before their opening World Cup match against Portugal.

Real Madrid announced on Tuesday that Lopetegui would replace Zinedine Zidane at the Bernabeu on a three-year-deal.

The Spanish football federation (RFEF) said it had dismissed the 51-year-old because the negotiation occurred "without any information to the RFEF".

The World Cup in Russia starts on Thursday.
 

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
4,923
This is quite a biggie. Some of you will know that yesterday, the Spain manager Julen Lopetegui had agreed to take over at Real Madrid after the World Cup. Now he won't have to wait, Spain have sacked him 24 hours before the World Cup starts! Turns out they weren't informed until 5 minutes before it was announced and were less than pleased.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/44467548

I get being pretty annoyed, but to sack your manager literally the day before the World Cup starts? That's insane!
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
10,678
Location
Redcar
Looking forward eight years, the 2026 World Cup will be held in the US, Canada and Mexico.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/44464913

The 2026 World Cup will be held in the United States, Canada and Mexico after their joint bid beat Morocco's proposal to host it.

The 'United 2026' bid was selected by Fifa member nations, winning 134 votes compared to 65 for Morocco.

The 2026 tournament will be the biggest World Cup ever held - with 48 teams playing 80 matches over 34 days.

Both Mexico (1970 and 1986) and the United States (1994) have previously hosted World Cups.
 

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
4,923
Well that will be a pretty expensive one in terms of travelling costs etc! Madness to have it spread out over such a large area.
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
10,678
Location
Redcar
Well that will be a pretty expensive one in terms of travelling costs etc! Madness to have it spread out over such a large area.

Though it satisfies the most important thing they consider when organising a World Cup, maximum revenue for FIFA.
 

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
4,923
But teams wont play one game in Edmonton, one game in Guadalajara and one in Florida will they!

For the teams who end up in the later stages, I don't see why not.
I'd assume the group themselves will be organised around a few stadiums, but as soon as you get out of the groups, presumably each country will want at least one quarter final each for example. And the semis probably split between two of the countries.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,287
Location
Fenny Stratford
For the teams who end up in the later stages, I don't see why not.
I'd assume the group themselves will be organised around a few stadiums, but as soon as you get out of the groups, presumably each country will want at least one quarter final each for example. And the semis probably split between two of the countries.

There are only 3 cities in each of Canada and Mexico to host a game. There are 10 games in each of Canada and Mexico with the rest in the USA. You would expect each host nation ( if they qualify) to play games in their own country so I suspect one group based in each of Mexico and Canada plus 2 knock out games. It isnt that much different to Russia.

For instance England will play group games in Stalingrad, Nizhny Novgorod and Konisberg. If we win Group G we go to Rostov on Don. If we are runners up we go to Moscow. After that it is either Samara or Kazan for a quarter final followed by Leningrad or Moscow for a semi followed by Lenningrad for runners up play off or Moscow for the final! .

They are not short journeys. Stalingrad to Nizhny Novgorod is about 1000km!
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,254
Location
West of Andover
There are only 3 cities in each of Canada and Mexico to host a game. There are 10 games in each of Canada and Mexico with the rest in the USA. You would expect each host nation ( if they qualify) to play games in their own country so I suspect one group based in each of Mexico and Canada plus 2 knock out games. It isnt that much different to Russia.

For instance England will play group games in Stalingrad, Nizhny Novgorod and Konisberg. If we win Group G we go to Rostov on Don. If we are runners up we go to Moscow. After that it is either Samara or Kazan for a quarter final followed by Leningrad or Moscow for a semi followed by Lenningrad for runners up play off or Moscow for the final! .

They are not short journeys. Stalingrad to Nizhny Novgorod is about 1000km!

Don't the hosts normally automatically qualify?
 

The_Train

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2018
Messages
4,358
It appears that Spain have sacked their manager the day before the World Cup is due to start. Solid preparation :D
 

greyman42

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2017
Messages
4,940
I honestly think England can win it. No one else has been setting the world on fire in the last 6 months.
 

Dentonian

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2017
Messages
1,192
I honestly think England can win it. No one else has been setting the world on fire in the last 6 months.

If Germany haven't been setting the world on fire in the last six months - that's ominous; "Hey, tell you what", it would be some story if Spain win it now.
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,777
Location
Devon
OK I’m going to say it...

I’m feeling quietly optimistic that England might do a little bit better than the last few times at this World Cup.
Does anyone else feel the same way (I know that I always do this mind)?
 

Top