• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Nottigham Express Transit

Status
Not open for further replies.

Comstock

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2012
Messages
535
The NET is losing a million pounds a week apparently....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-42719544

Tramlink Nottingham's annual report showed the company was losing nearly £1m a week in the year up to March 2017, despite 15 million passengers using the service during that period.

Tramlink Nottingham said the loss was due to an impairment charge, but turnover increased by more than £15m.

The annual report shows losses of £48.51m, despite passengers numbers rising from 11.5 million in 2016....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Goldie

Member
Joined
29 Sep 2014
Messages
156
The NET is losing a million pounds a week apparently....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-42719544
That is some astonishingly poor reporting. There's no attempt on the part of the BBC to work out whether financial losses are a) what was expected by the franchisee; or b) bigger than expected but still manageable; or c) a sign that a Metronet style collapse of the franchisee is about to happen. There's no attempt to explain what an "impairment charge is". I assume that the losses are largely caused by servicing the debt incurred during construction, but you can't tell for sure from the report...
 

kevjs

Member
Joined
4 Sep 2013
Messages
402
http://www.nottinghampost.com/news/business/tram-operator-reveals-more-details-1082577 has some more details - not sure what that means in English but it seems to be expected in the main.

A Tramlink Nottingham spokesman said: “In common with any Private Finance Initiative (PFI) concession, the level of interest payments on initial commercial lending used to fund new infrastructure delivery is profiled throughout the course of the contract in accordance with agreements with the lenders.

“This is the case here and the concession’s commercial debt reflects the front end construction and infrastructure costs incurred in completing the two new tramlines and buying new trams.

“Clearly the expanded network is now operating successfully and is fully financed for the duration of the concession...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

317 forever

Established Member
Joined
21 Aug 2010
Messages
2,571
Location
North West
I realise that Nottingham Trams have basically 2 overlapping services: Hucknall - Nottingham - Toton Lane and Phoenix Park - Nottingham - Clifton South.

Do the Incentro trams (201-15) and Citadis trams (216-37) work both lines, or does 1 batch keep to 1 line and the other batch to the other line?

My aim is to ride both modern southern extensions once using opposite tram types.
 

DriverToBe

Member
Joined
10 May 2015
Messages
66
I realise that Nottingham Trams have basically 2 overlapping services: Hucknall - Nottingham - Toton Lane and Phoenix Park - Nottingham - Clifton South.

Do the Incentro trams (201-15) and Citadis trams (216-37) work both lines, or does 1 batch keep to 1 line and the other batch to the other line?

My aim is to ride both modern southern extensions once using opposite tram types.

Both types are used on both lines.
 

route101

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
10,609
Used the Nottingham tram last Thursday . First time in Nottingham , nice city and smaller compared to my hometown of Glasgow . Rode 3 branches of the line , Hucknall , Phoenix Park and Toton Lane . Did not have enough time for Clifton South . Was impressed by the bridges at the railway station and hospital . When at old market square stop someone asked me if i was a spotter and advised me of a tram FB group .
 

jfowkes

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2017
Messages
883
Here's a question about the Nottingham trams:

Between Wilkinson Street and the Forest, the northbound and southbound lines split up and essentially follow two parallel roads. I assume this is because there was insufficient space to run both tracks in parallel.

But, the northbound line runs on the easternmost track and the southbound on the westernmost, which means the two tracks have to cross each other at both ends of this section.

Any idea why they did this? It seems like there must be a good reason, as it introduces conflicts that wouldn't be there otherwise.
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
14,812
Location
Epsom
Are the roads in question one way streets?

I've been along there quite a few times but never thought to check something like that!
 

bluegoblin7

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2011
Messages
1,370
Location
JB/JP/JW
Yes, one way, I understand.

Noel Street (Forest to Wilkinson Street) is one way with the trams running on a reserved contraflow.

Radford Road (Wilkinson Street to Forest) is two-way traffic with the trams running on street.
 

jfowkes

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2017
Messages
883
Ah, I see. Should have looked at the map more carefully.

Noel Street is one-way, but reverses the one-way direction at a junction half-way along it. So the tram is only contraflow for half of it.
 

OwlMan

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2008
Messages
3,206
Location
Bedworth, Warwickshire
A car seems to have ventured off the road onto NET tracks

BBC Here's the car that has ended up on tram tracks in Nottingham - leading to services being halted between the University Boulevard and NG2 stops.

NET, which runs the tram network in Nottingham, said a recovery vehicle was removing the car.

89d56cd6-5ec6-4309-88e6-18eeb47146ce.png
 

jfowkes

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2017
Messages
883
It happens every few months on that bridge, despite all the warning/no entry signs. Apparently some satnavs don't understand it's tram only - and nor do some drivers.
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
1,341
Location
East Midlands
It happens every few months on that bridge, despite all the warning/no entry signs. Apparently some satnavs don't understand it's tram only - and nor do some drivers.

The road layout is very poor. Obviously the primary responsibility lies with the drvers but when they were building this section my first thought was 'drivers will regularly drive up the tram track'.
Ideally the road should curve/move to the left and then to the right before this point, then the correct route could be straight on at this point (instead of 'straight on' leading to the tram tracks), but that would have required some land take and possibly a building demolished/moved and would have messed with the on-road tram alignment.
Maybe some sort of flashing stop sign could be triggered if a car enters the offroad section? The first section is fully paved and you could easily reverse off of it, but this vehicle have gone past that onto the 'railway style' section and got stuck. You could extend the paved section a bit as well to give extra stopping distance.
 

jfowkes

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2017
Messages
883
Those automatic bollards they use to only let certain vehicles into pedestrianised areas/bus lanes would work? Just lower then when a tram approaches.
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
1,341
Location
East Midlands
Potentially very dangerous if they develop a fault and rise under the tram. And if someone does drive into them they'll probably get stuck in the up position and cause a much longer service disruption than the current situation where the car is just lifted/towed off the tracks.

Maybe a holographic barrier would work? :E
 

whhistle

On Moderation
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
2,636
Nottingham Express Transit has released a statement stating apologising for any inconvenience..
Not sure why they should apologise.
It wasn't their fault?
Just creates this default "anything wrong, say sorry but it means nothing, thus there's no point in saying it" culture.

"We're sorry for the litter... that you dropped... on our floor"
 

Ken H

On Moderation
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
6,287
Location
N Yorks
I have been on NET a few times. The standard fare is extortionate if you are only doing a couple of stops. I sometimes stay at the premer inn in Goldsmith street, tram stop outside. It was raining and I wanted to get from Lacemarket, just 3 stops. But it was still over £2. Same as going all the way to the terminus.

It also seems to dawdle. They need to speed things up a little, especially the stops.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,869
Location
Nottingham
I have been on NET a few times. The standard fare is extortionate if you are only doing a couple of stops. I sometimes stay at the premer inn in Goldsmith street, tram stop outside. It was raining and I wanted to get from Lacemarket, just 3 stops. But it was still over £2. Same as going all the way to the terminus.

It also seems to dawdle. They need to speed things up a little, especially the stops.
You should have got one of these.
https://www.thetram.net/short-hops.aspx
Our City sHOPper offers travel between Nottingham station and Nottingham Trent University for just £1 each way.
 

jfowkes

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2017
Messages
883
Last edited by a moderator:

spinba11

Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
182
There is no service between Meadows Way West and University Boulevard due to a car stuck on a bridge no prize for guessing which bridge, how much road is there after the no entry sign and before the road ends?
 

jfowkes

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2017
Messages
883
Measuring on google maps: from the stop line at the lights (the point at which the road turns right), there is 21m before the no entry point, then another 26m before the tarmac runs out altogether.
 

spinba11

Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
182
You need to be a special kind of stupid to actually get stuck on the tram lines, there is enough leeway to allow a genuine mistake but to continue the full 47m? I’m sorry but if you end up on the tracks you shouldn’t be driving
 

Jozhua

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2019
Messages
1,856
You need to be a special kind of stupid to actually get stuck on the tram lines, there is enough leeway to allow a genuine mistake but to continue the full 47m? I’m sorry but if you end up on the tracks you shouldn’t be driving

Agreed! If they're so desperate to go on the bridge maybe they should be taking the team...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top