• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Sheffield/Rotherham Tram-Train update

Status
Not open for further replies.

Qwertychops

Member
Joined
22 Nov 2018
Messages
14
Used to work in Sheffield and lived in Rotherham, did the daily trip on the bus no. 69 , that was in the mid 80,s - That tram journey looks so much better
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Tim R-T-C

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2011
Messages
2,143
I stopped by at Rotherham today and since I was on a Sheffield regional ticket, took a ride up to Parkgate and back.

Very active ticket checker onboard - are they on the standard trams as well? Presumably to stop people using train tickets on the trams.

The announcements at Rotherham did still seem quite random, kept warning people to standback from platform 1 even when nothing was happening.
 

Bungle965

Established Member
Associate Staff
Buses & Coaches
Joined
2 Jul 2014
Messages
2,846
Location
Blackley and Broughton/ Walsall South
I stopped by at Rotherham today and since I was on a Sheffield regional ticket, took a ride up to Parkgate and back.

Very active ticket checker onboard - are they on the standard trams as well? Presumably to stop people using train tickets on the trams.

The announcements at Rotherham did still seem quite random, kept warning people to standback from platform 1 even when nothing was happening.
Yes, I have always found that the Supertram conductors are keen to check tickets!
Sam
 

button_boxer

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
1,270
Very active ticket checker onboard - are they on the standard trams as well?

They're ticket sellers, not just checkers - Supertram has no platform ticket machines (they did in the very early days but haven't now for many years), so single fares are always purchased on board, and day/week tickets are also available from the conductor.
 

unlevel42

Member
Joined
5 May 2011
Messages
543
The incident was at the Staniforth Road* crossing and involved a car.
Same place as last time but in the opposite direction
At least this time they can stick the working bits of the trams/trains together by cutting and pasting- as they did in the past with the damaged Supertrams.

*Although it is the at the junction of Woodburn Road and Staniforth Road the former runs parallel to the tram route and crosses beyond the Woodburn Road stop
 
Last edited:

unlevel42

Member
Joined
5 May 2011
Messages
543
They're ticket sellers, not just checkers - Supertram has no platform ticket machines (they did in the very early days but haven't now for many years), so single fares are always purchased on board, and day/week tickets are also available from the conductor.
There are periodic ticket checkers who ask to see tickets and passes-often working in a small groups.
 

stuartl

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2014
Messages
165
From the pictures on the bbc website it looks as though, once again, it has involved a tram coming from meadowhall to sheffield at the staniforth rosd/woodburn road junction. At those lights there is a sharp curve on the meadowhall side which obscures the tram until it is very close to the lights. So anyone trying to beat the lights would have little time to get across before the tram was visible. Could the timing of the lights be altered to give a bigger delay so anyone trying to beat the lights would have a bigger safety margin? I'm not a driver or expert on traffic signals so don't know if this is a good idea or not.
 

unlevel42

Member
Joined
5 May 2011
Messages
543
From the pictures on the bbc website it looks as though, once again, it has involved a tram coming from meadowhall to sheffield at the staniforth rosd/woodburn road junction. At those lights there is a sharp curve on the meadowhall side which obscures the tram until it is very close to the lights. So anyone trying to beat the lights would have little time to get across before the tram was visible. Could the timing of the lights be altered to give a bigger delay so anyone trying to beat the lights would have a bigger safety margin? I'm not a driver or expert on traffic signals so don't know if this is a good idea or not.
The first incident involved a lorry going downhill along Staniforth Road and a tram train from City to Parkgate.
Today tram train was going in the opposite direction, Parkgate to City (with a restricted view of the crossing compared to the first incident) by the damage to the tram, the car was going uphill with a much better view of the oncoming tram.
 

bluegoblin7

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2011
Messages
1,372
Location
JB/JP/JW
At least this time they can stick the working bits of the trams/trains together by cutting and pasting- as they did in the past with the damaged Supertrams.

That depends on the damage - although it appears that the damage to 202 is confined to one end, the same cannot be said for 204.
 

Harpers Tate

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2013
Messages
1,700
The first incident involved a lorry going downhill along Staniforth Road and a tram train from City to Parkgate......
If you are referring to the incident on opening day, then I'm afraid you are mistaken. The tram(-train) was city bound. The grooves in the road surface are there as evidence - never mind the photographs taken at the time. And therefore, the lorry was going towards Darnall (up).
 

unlevel42

Member
Joined
5 May 2011
Messages
543
If you are referring to the incident on opening day, then I'm afraid you are mistaken. The tram(-train) was city bound. The grooves in the road surface are there as evidence - never mind the photographs taken at the time. And therefore, the lorry was going towards Darnall (up).
I am absolutely wrong and you are correct. My apologies.
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,855
Location
Yorkshire
What is the impact of this in terms of maintaining the current service pattern?
Is there still enough vehicles to do this?
Sam

Three needed plus one spare for the TT services... we're now on five but there's only two fitted with the correct wheels - lets hope they get the third by Monday...
 

bluegoblin7

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2011
Messages
1,372
Location
JB/JP/JW
Should be three with TT wheels - 206 was fitted out after 204's bump, leaving 201, 203 and 206 now available for TT services.
 

button_boxer

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
1,270
It's rather worrying that we've had two incidents in the space of a few weeks at that same location, both with inbound TT services. How many incidents have there been with the older tram vehicles at the same location? Is it something specific to the TTs that means they have a longer emergency stopping distance?
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,855
Location
Yorkshire
Silly question, what is the distance from Tinsley/Meadowhall South to Rotherham Central & to Parkgate?

The closest NR point to Meadowhall South is Tinsley North Jn, so from there to Rotherham is 1mi79ch, and from Tinsley North to Parkgate is 3mi12ch. I suspect the distance between Tinsley North Jn and Meadowhall South is negligible
 

Harpers Tate

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2013
Messages
1,700
Measured on google maps: Meadowhall South/Tinsley tram stop to
Rotherham Central Tram platform 2.35 miles
Parkgate Tram Stop 3.54 miles
 

TC60054

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2016
Messages
586
Location
South Sheffield
I make Tinsley tram stop to Tinsley North Jn at roughly 35 chains. The distance for Tinsley North Jn to Rotherham Central and Parkgate is available on Railmiles.

(3mi 12ch to Parkgate, and 1mi 79ch to Central as @_toommm_ has said above)
 

SC43090

Member
Joined
7 Sep 2018
Messages
197
The lorry driver involved with the opening day accident involving Tram Train 204 is due to appear in Sheffield Magistrate court on 14th February charged with driving without due care & attention also charged with contravening a red traffic light says South Yorkshire Police..... The info as come from the BBC Local news pages........

SC 43090
 

SC43090

Member
Joined
7 Sep 2018
Messages
197
The Two tram trains that have been involved in Accidents 399204 & 399202 In October & November.... The 2 good ends have been married up to make one good working Tram train entered traffic sometime in the last few weeks.....


SC 43090
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
The truck driver responsible for the crash on the opening day of the tram-train service has been charged with dangerous driving and ignoring a red light.

https://www.thestar.co.uk/news/crim...field-to-rotherham-tram-train-crash-1-9506331

A man will appear in court charged with driving without due care and attention following a crash between a lorry and a tram-train in Sheffield. The 60-year-old, from Rotherham, is due to appear at Sheffield Magistrates’ Court on February 14 following the collision on October 25 – the day the service welcomed passengers for the first time.

The crash happened at the junction of Woodbourn Road and Staniforth Road in Darnall. South Yorkshire Police said the man will also be charged with contravening a red traffic light.
 
Last edited:

spinba11

Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
182
The Two tram trains that have been involved in Accidents 399204 & 399202 In October & November.... The 2 good ends have been married up to make one good working Tram train entered traffic sometime in the last few weeks.....


SC 43090
Will there be a new vehicle built to replace the 2 damaged halfs or are the damaged halfs being repaired?
 

Harpers Tate

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2013
Messages
1,700
I gather from elsewhere (I forget where) that the two-into-one damaged unit is going back to Stadler to be fully repaired to as-new. Whether the parts will be re-martialled back to their original formations upon its return, I don't know.
 

TC60054

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2016
Messages
586
Location
South Sheffield
I gather from elsewhere (I forget where) that the two-into-one damaged unit is going back to Stadler to be fully repaired to as-new. Whether the parts will be re-martialled back to their original formations upon its return, I don't know.
Why would they be? It'd just cause two fully working units to be taken out of service unnecessarily. The only chance they'd have of returning to their original formations would be if they managed to both have serious collisions on their respective ends - very unlikely. It's also a process that's been made twice before on Supertram (102/111 in 1995, 118/120 in 2015) and neither of those have been returned to original formations, for the reason above.

For the record, new formations:
Unit No1end-centre-no2end
399202 999002-999102-999204
399204 999004-999104-999202
 

Harpers Tate

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2013
Messages
1,700
As I say - I don't know. I could make assumptions as you clearly have, but that isn't the same as knowing.
 

TC60054

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2016
Messages
586
Location
South Sheffield
As I say - I don't know. I could make assumptions as you clearly have, but that isn't the same as knowing.
Where are the assumptions? They will NOT return to their original formations unless someone's really plotting against Supertram and wrecks two ends of the same two units again, at around the same time. Simply, there is no business case for pulling a serviceable unit off service just to change a carriage around.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top