• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Return journey on advance tickets did not fully print

Status
Not open for further replies.

BigCj34

Member
Joined
5 Apr 2016
Messages
771
I was making a return journey from Colchester to London Liverpool Street, both on Advance tickets which were purchased through Traingenius. However when picking up the tickets only the outward ticket printed, and even the collection receipt acknowledges that there was 1 coupon to the value of £6.60 (I paid £13.20 for them both).

I spoke to the Greater Anglia staff who told me to speak to the vendor. In the meantime, I had to pay full price for the return part of the trip. When I contacted Traingenius, they told me to speak to Greater Anglia as they claim it must have been a machine fault, though given the information on the collection receipt I am not sure it is.

Who then is responsible for refunding my ticket?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ForTheLoveOf

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2017
Messages
6,416
If the collection receipt states that only one ticket was, and was scheduled to be, printed, then clearly this is a problem with Traingenius entering the tickets into the National Reservation System (the system which holds the details of Ticket on Departure bookings awaiting collection) correctly.

I would get back to Traingenius and ask them how it can be GA's fault if the collection receipt clearly states what it does.

If they continue to squabble about over 'whose fault' it is (which is an unbelievable phenomenon rather unique to the rail industry, really - rather than simply reimbursing the passenger and then sorting it internally(!)) - then write a Letter Before Claim to both Traingenius and GA. If they don't pay up, take out a Money Claim Online (County Court claim) against both of them jointly and let the Court decide who's liable (they may decide there's joint and several liability).
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,818
Location
Scotland
If they continue to squabble about over 'whose fault' it is (which is an unbelievable phenomenon rather unique to the rail industry...)
Don't let facts get in the way of a rant. I've personally experienced passing the buck outside the railway industry (e.g. retailer blaming delivery company who blame the retailer, or two airlines blaming each other for losing my luggage), and have heard countless other examples from friends and acquaintances.
 

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,654
Don't let facts get in the way of a rant. I've personally experienced passing the buck outside the railway industry (e.g. retailer blaming delivery company who blame the retailer, or two airlines blaming each other for losing my luggage), and have heard countless other examples from friends and acquaintances.

Agreed, this sort of nonsense happens everywhere.
 

ForTheLoveOf

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2017
Messages
6,416
Don't let facts get in the way of a rant. I've personally experienced passing the buck outside the railway industry (e.g. retailer blaming delivery company who blame the retailer, or two airlines blaming each other for losing my luggage), and have heard countless other examples from friends and acquaintances.
I note you're not denying it's true: the rail industry is certainly unique in the pervasiveness of the squabbling about. Other industries have it to a more limited extent, but only the rail industry has it so ingrained from the way it was privatised.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,818
Location
Scotland
I note you're not denying it's true: the rail industry is certainly unique in the pervasiveness of the squabbling about.
It is not. As an example, both airlines I noted above acknowledged that my bags were lost, however both refused to compensate me saying that the other was at fault (or, more precisely, both refused to take responsibility).
 

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,654
Courier companies who have what are essentially connections where they change to a different courier for delivery outside the uk are exactly the same.
They will argue between themselves for months and months. Meanwhile the customer has nothing.


Banks with argue with each other over who has the money when something goes wrong internally. This goes on for months and it’s really only the customer that loses out.

There have been endless debates with telephone companies as to who is responsible for a fault. The provider or the person who owns the line. Neither is the customer yet it is the customer who suffers whilst they bicker for weeks on end.

The railway does this too but it is not alone nor does it stand out as being any worse than other organisations whether it be transport related or otherwise.
 

Wallsendmag

Established Member
Joined
11 Dec 2014
Messages
5,199
Location
Wallsend or somewhere in GB
If the collection receipt states that only one ticket was, and was scheduled to be, printed, then clearly this is a problem with Traingenius entering the tickets into the National Reservation System (the system which holds the details of Ticket on Departure bookings awaiting collection) correctly.
NRS doesn't hold tickets only reservations, you may be thinking of LSM.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top