• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

LNER conveying passengers for free due to Gatwick disruption (20/12)

Status
Not open for further replies.

43055

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
2,903
With all the disruption at Gatwick due to drones over the airfield LNER have decided that passengers due to fly but have a cancelled flight can use there trains between London and Scotland today (this includes Edinburgh, Inverness, Aberdeen and Glasgow). Well done LNER!

upload_2018-12-20_9-37-52.png
https://twitter.com/LNER/status/1075665317156786176
Has your flight between London #GatwickAirport and Edinburgh been cancelled today? If so, you can use your flight tickets to travel on our trains today for FREE. #HomeforChristmas
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,849
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Good bit of publicity there. Presumably the hope is that they'll realise the train is better and do that next time. I hope there isn't massive disruption on the rails today to knacker that! :)
 

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,654
It would be interesting to see how many people (given they must have initially chosen their mode of transport) chose to fly based upon a time saving, in which case they’re going to be disappointed and those who chose it based upon a cost saving who therefore may be happy to get a train.

I’ll also be interested to see if Scotrail suggest they’ll accept tickets. I don’t know the flight times but people have been told they can travel to Inverness but of course that’s only good if they get the 1200.
 

IanD

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2011
Messages
2,719
Location
Newport Pagnell
It would be interesting to see how many people (given they must have initially chosen their mode of transport) chose to fly based upon a time saving, in which case they’re going to be disappointed

You'd think they would just be happy to get home but no doubt some will be bleating about their disappointment on social media.
 

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,654
You'd think they would just be happy to get home but no doubt some will be bleating about their disappointment on social media.
I suppose the risk is that they won’t get a seat and there will be limited room for luggage due to increased luggage at this time of year and increased passengers but I’d certainly be happy just to get home. I landed at The wrong airport due to an incident before and have been glad of the effort people put in to getting you where you needed to be. On that ocassion there was limited space on buses so they hired a car for me and had it picked up from my house the following day.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,665
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Meanwhile, passengers on diverted fights to Gatwick are being bussed there from the diversion airport instead, even from Luton (with frequent through trains to Gatwick) and Newcastle.
The airlines generally don't like to send their passengers by train, and lose control of the costs.
 

HullRailMan

Member
Joined
8 Oct 2018
Messages
325
So if I decide to travel today long distance on LNER I could pay hundreds of pounds for my trip yet the person sat next to me could be travelling for free having not even being a rail passenger in the first place. Is that fair?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,849
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
The airlines generally don't like to send their passengers by train, and lose control of the costs.

You can of course go by train yourself, which most people on expenses probably will do. And if their car isn't at Gatwick they may just go straight home. And for some, who have selected the airport based on cost rather than the location of it, it might even be *more* convenient! :)
 

eisenach

Member
Joined
6 Feb 2014
Messages
169
Location
Leominster
So if I decide to travel today long distance on LNER I could pay hundreds of pounds for my trip yet the person sat next to me could be travelling for free having not even being a rail passenger in the first place. Is that fair?

Oh, come on! What happened to empathy and solidarity!
Good on LNER.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,849
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
So if I decide to travel today long distance on LNER I could pay hundreds of pounds for my trip yet the person sat next to me could be travelling for free having not even being a rail passenger in the first place. Is that fair?

They may have paid £10 for an Advance, too. Bothered about that?

They have of course paid for a flight they can't use. Might well be more than you paid.
 

mmh

Established Member
Joined
13 Aug 2016
Messages
3,744
So if I decide to travel today long distance on LNER I could pay hundreds of pounds for my trip yet the person sat next to me could be travelling for free having not even being a rail passenger in the first place. Is that fair?

Nope, it's not fair at all that the person could find themselves sat next to someone as mean-spirited as you due to no fault of their own.
 

bengley

Established Member
Joined
18 May 2008
Messages
1,843
So if I decide to travel today long distance on LNER I could pay hundreds of pounds for my trip yet the person sat next to me could be travelling for free having not even being a rail passenger in the first place. Is that fair?
Yep. Deal with it.
 

Ben Bow

Member
Joined
20 Sep 2018
Messages
342
Interesting that LNER can find space on their services for potentially hundreds of airline passengers a few days before Christmas. Meanwhile Hull Trains passengers have been 'personae non grata' at busy times.... Hmm....
 

markindurham

Member
Joined
1 Nov 2011
Messages
385
It's nice to see that the season of goodwill to all has kicked in, isn't it? Oh, hang on...

Far better to direct one's ire towards the cockwombles who thought it a jolly jape to fly drones so close to Gatwick Airport :(
 

Nora93

Member
Joined
27 Mar 2016
Messages
16
c2c are also passing stranded passengers or if anyone is re-routed via Southend Airport.
 

GB

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2008
Messages
6,457
Location
Somewhere
So if I decide to travel today long distance on LNER I could pay hundreds of pounds for my trip yet the person sat next to me could be travelling for free having not even being a rail passenger in the first place. Is that fair?

I assume that if the guard said you could travel for free or they upgraded you to first class free of charge you would refuse their offer?
 

Coolzac

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2014
Messages
307
I think this is great from LNER- I am surprised they haven't imposed a restriction, like only valid on off peak services.

But we need more goodwill gestures like this from the railways. It would probably in the long run benefit as it would encourage more people to use the train!
 

LeeLivery

Established Member
Joined
13 Jul 2014
Messages
1,462
Location
London
So if I decide to travel today long distance on LNER I could pay hundreds of pounds for my trip yet the person sat next to me could be travelling for free having not even being a rail passenger in the first place. Is that fair?

What's unfair is an idiot flying drones over an airport and people being stranded all over the place, possibly missing funerals, weddings, work, etc.
 

DanDaDriver

Member
Joined
5 May 2018
Messages
338
They did indeed - I'm surprised beardie hasn't got in on the act this time as well.

It’s almost like he just franchises the Virgin branding and marketing rather than sitting on his private island fretting about pathing, rosters, and getting stock back for its C exams etc etc ..... ;)

But well done LNER nonetheless!
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
10,678
Location
Redcar
Interesting that LNER can find space on their services for potentially hundreds of airline passengers a few days before Christmas. Meanwhile Hull Trains passengers have been 'personae non grata' at busy times.... Hmm....

Yet we haven't a clue what conversations have gone on behind the scenes between LNER and the airlines.

Regardless, Hull Trains could have solved the issue multiple times recently when they couldn't run a service by giving new tickets to their passengers. Then they could have travelled on LNER regardless of how busy they were supposed to be.
 

cuccir

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
3,659
I think this is great from LNER- I am surprised they haven't imposed a restriction, like only valid on off peak services.

LNER's services to Aberdeen (except the 16:00) and Inverness already have - for today and Friday - restrictions making them drop-off only for their calls south of Berwick so these restrictions may have fortuitously helped to generate the capacity to offer this.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
8,161
I think worse than sitting in an airport (usually knowing nothing) are the poor souls who are trapped in an aircraft on the ground for hours on end - often airlines refuse to sell them the goods on the tollies which IMO is appalling.

I would like a law where if pax are stuck on an aircraft on the runway then aftre an hour that HAVE to be released back to the terminal unless there's an imminent departure slot. Of course that slot may come immediately aftre disembarking (sod's law) but you can't keep animals inside a lorry indefinately; why humans?
 

pdeaves

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
5,631
Location
Gateway to the South West
So if I decide to travel today long distance on LNER I could pay hundreds of pounds for my trip yet the person sat next to me could be travelling for free having not even being a rail passenger in the first place. Is that fair?
It's no more 'unfair' than someone buying something in a sale that I got for full price just before the sale started.
 

IceAgeComing

Member
Joined
31 Jul 2018
Messages
74
So if I decide to travel today long distance on LNER I could pay hundreds of pounds for my trip yet the person sat next to me could be travelling for free having not even being a rail passenger in the first place. Is that fair?

I booked a Stirling-London advance for £17.50 a month ago; is that fair? Besides its Christmas, I'd rather that people get to where they need to go in plenty of time and limited stress than end up stuck in Gatwick Airport for days before; which might screw up any further connections or plans if they're only going somewhere for a very short time. I've flown home for Christmas before and I know the worry about theoretical delays so I'm more than fine to be sat with people who weren't meant to get the train if it means that they get to where they need to for Christmas.

I just hope that Scotrail do the decent thing and have acceptance up to Inverness for those people; although if LNER staff at Kings Cross give a person permission to travel to Inverness then doesn't that mean that they have that permission regardless of the train company?
 

tiptoptaff

Established Member
Joined
15 Feb 2013
Messages
3,028
I just hope that Scotrail do the decent thing and have acceptance up to Inverness for those people; although if LNER staff at Kings Cross give a person permission to travel to Inverness then doesn't that mean that they have that permission regardless of the train company?
I don't think it would be quite that straightforward as they don't hold rail tickets - I guess that LNER would be accepting airline tickets as proof. I'm not convinced ScotRail would have to accept them just because LNER staff said they're valid on LNER trains. I'm equally not convinced that ScotRail would leave potentially 100s of people stranded in Edinburgh, either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top