• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

TPE Class 397 ('Nova 2') construction and updates

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
2,781
It doesn't appear to be. Maybe the railway should join the 21st Century and go paperless. Things might actually happen then.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

TBSchenker

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2010
Messages
551
It must be frustrating having assets sat around doing nothing whilst something as simple as paperwork is delaying things.

It's not as if there's a dedicated team responsible for the introduction of new trains. They're already delayed, there should be no excuse for further delays to the programme. It sounds like there's drivers sat around waiting to drive them and start the commissioning and testing, but they're not allowed to due to 'paperwork' .
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,476
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
It must be frustrating having assets sat around doing nothing whilst something as simple as paperwork is delaying things.

It's not as if there's a dedicated team responsible for the introduction of new trains. They're already delayed, there should be no excuse for further delays to the programme. It sounds like there's drivers sat around waiting to drive them and start the commissioning and testing, but they're not allowed to due to 'paperwork' .
I'm not entirely convinced that 'paperwork' in this sense is literally vast swathes of paper; it's probably a large series of digital PDFs which need to be signed and countersigned.
 

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
2,781
Won't the paperwork be ORR approval to carry passengers?
Quite obviously not. They won't be carrying passengers for months and certainly won't be on test runs. The 397s haven't done anything at all so far except be dragged about a bit and some electrical interference testing a month or so ago.
 

TBSchenker

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2010
Messages
551
They were apparently all set to have their maiden run last week but Network Rail cancelled the move due to the bad weather. This week they've been due out at some point, but clearly something is amiss.
 

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
2,781
When it was stated last week that Network Rail had put a stop to the Thursday and Friday testing, and with the cold weather, I did assume it might be to reduce the risk of OHLE damage to due ice, but as you say as they haven’t done any of the planned testing this week either there is obviously more to it.
 

BucksBones

Member
Joined
18 Jul 2017
Messages
332
Some from the delivery at Cheadle Hulme today


Sorry if this has been covered before but what’s going on with the door layout of the end carriages? At one end of the train it looks like a vestibule layout like the intermediate carriages but at the other end there’s a window between the door and the cab. Does that one open straight into the saloon?
 

driver9000

Established Member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
4,230
Sorry if this has been covered before but what’s going on with the door layout of the end carriages? At one end of the train it looks like a vestibule layout like the intermediate carriages but at the other end there’s a window between the door and the cab. Does that one open straight into the saloon?

In this photograph you are looking at the standard class driving car (coach A). The window behind the cab is where the cycle space is located and also contains a few tip up seats. The other driving car (coach E) is 1st class and has the window blanked out because that is where the kitchen is located. Both saloons are separated from the vestibule by powered doors.
 

Nymanic

Member
Joined
6 Jan 2014
Messages
146
Location
Manchester
Sorry if this has been covered before but what’s going on with the door layout of the end carriages? At one end of the train it looks like a vestibule layout like the intermediate carriages but at the other end there’s a window between the door and the cab. Does that one open straight into the saloon?

The 397 design is rather curious in that regard. I believe the window just behind that cab is an area of tip-up seats (as per the below image on the CAF website).

4-tren-regional-transpennine.jpg


It might also be the area used for bike reservations - somewhat unfortunate, as those seats will always be occupied by seated or standing passengers anyway.

At the rear end of that carriage there's either no window, or it's blanked out. This could indicate a toilet - I'm not sure if it'll be an accessible one or not.

The leading car at the other end will house first class. The frontmost window apertures are there, but covered up. This'll almost certainly be the first class galley.

2-tren-regional-transpennine.jpg


At the rear end of this car, I'd expect another toilet, this time definitely accessible, so as to be reachable for both first and standard passengers.

Those end windows are rather unique to the 397, and I think I like them.

Edit: beaten to it. And the images don't show in my post. You can see them at:
https://www.caf.net/en/productos-servicios/proyectos/proyecto-detalle.php?p=286
 

SP Man

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2018
Messages
146
It had nothing to do with bad weather. Some test results needed checking and confirmation on the results between differant parties before authorising testing on live railway. This should bow commence next Tuesday from Crewe.
 

driver9000

Established Member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
4,230
The 397 design is rather curious in that regard. I believe the window just behind that cab is an area of tip-up seats (as per the below image on the CAF website).

4-tren-regional-transpennine.jpg

At the rear end of that carriage there's either no window, or it's blanked out. This could indicate a toilet - I'm not sure if it'll be an accessible one or not.
2-tren-regional-transpennine.jpg

There is a standard toilet at the inner end of the standard class driving car. The only accessible toilet is in the 1st class driving car.
 

BucksBones

Member
Joined
18 Jul 2017
Messages
332
In this photograph you are looking at the standard class driving car (coach A). The window behind the cab is where the cycle space is located and also contains a few tip up seats. The other driving car (coach E) is 1st class and has the window blanked out because that is where the kitchen is located. Both saloons are separated from the vestibule by powered doors.

The 397 design is rather curious in that regard. I believe the window just behind that cab is an area of tip-up seats (as per the below image on the CAF website).

4-tren-regional-transpennine.jpg


It might also be the area used for bike reservations - somewhat unfortunate, as those seats will always be occupied by seated or standing passengers anyway.

At the rear end of that carriage there's either no window, or it's blanked out. This could indicate a toilet - I'm not sure if it'll be an accessible one or not.

The leading car at the other end will house first class. The frontmost window apertures are there, but covered up. This'll almost certainly be the first class galley.

2-tren-regional-transpennine.jpg


At the rear end of this car, I'd expect another toilet, this time definitely accessible, so as to be reachable for both first and standard passengers.

Those end windows are rather unique to the 397, and I think I like them.

Edit: beaten to it. And the images don't show in my post. You can see them at:
https://www.caf.net/en/productos-servicios/proyectos/proyecto-detalle.php?p=286

Thanks both. I like it too, very sensible layout although they will have to make sure the bicycle priority area (if that’s what it is) is very clearly marked as such.
 

Sleeperwaking

Member
Joined
20 Oct 2018
Messages
166
It must be frustrating having assets sat around doing nothing whilst something as simple as paperwork is delaying things.

The paperwork required to demonstrate that a first-in-class train is safe to go out on the live railway under its own power for the first time is anything but "simple"... o_O o_O o_O
 

TBSchenker

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2010
Messages
551
Agreed, but much expense was accumulated testing the units in the Czech Republic, including training the drivers who will drive them . Whilst this is a first in class type, it has already operated for many hundreds (thousands?) of miles and the experience and data should be transferrable to the UK. Aren't we under a standard EU UIC system for railways now?
 

Sleeperwaking

Member
Joined
20 Oct 2018
Messages
166
Aren't we under a standard EU UIC system for railways now?

:lol: :lol: :lol: You're very funny, got any other ones?

Network Rail has a lot of infrastructure, varying in age from days old to 100s of years old. There's not a lot of it that complies to EU standards. Some assets don't even have any standard (UK, NR or otherwise) that describes the compatibility requirements for rolling stock design.

As for the tests done in the Czech Republic, the number of miles accumulated on a segregated test track doesn't factor much wrt acceptance for going on the UK mainline. It's completing the full suite of tests, getting the test results analysed and written up into a report, then getting the reports and myriad other evidences reviewed by the NoBo/DeBo who hopefully confirm that compliance has been demonstrated. A train may undergo some modifications after the start of testing which require the tests to be re-done. Overall, there's a lot of data that needs to be checked thoroughly and accepted and it's not a very fast process. It certainly isn't a very simple process.
 

Ih8earlies

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2018
Messages
150
In response to those queries about the internal layout:
 

Attachments

  • 20190210_095039.png
    20190210_095039.png
    473.6 KB · Views: 345

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,415
Why is there so much non seating length? Are those grey bits at the end of the carriages electrical cabinets?
 

VT 390

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2018
Messages
1,366
Why are the so many table seats, would it not make more sense to have fewer tables but more seats?
 

driver9000

Established Member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
4,230
Why are the so many table seats, would it not make more sense to have fewer tables but more seats?

Normally the complaints are the exact opposite! The 397 is aimed more at leisure travel and a desire for tables and seats lined up to windows was expressed so that's what they've been fitted out with.
 

driver9000

Established Member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
4,230
Why is there so much non seating length? Are those grey bits at the end of the carriages electrical cabinets?

Yes they are. Unfortunately the equipment has to go somewhere as it doesn't all fit below the floor or in the roof.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,415
Yes they are. Unfortunately the equipment has to go somewhere as it doesn't all fit below the floor or in the roof.

Is there no way this equipment could be in flat cabinets beneath raised seats, bit like at the back of a bus? Obviously they would be very non-priority and not first taken, but they would be seats.....
 

driver9000

Established Member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
4,230
Is there no way this equipment could be in flat cabinets beneath raised seats, bit like at the back of a bus? Obviously they would be very non-priority and not first taken, but they would be seats.....

Evidently not....
 

VT 390

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2018
Messages
1,366
Normally the complaints are the exact opposite! The 397 is aimed more at leisure travel and a desire for tables and seats lined up to windows was expressed so that's what they've been fitted out with.

I agree that seats lined up with windows is very good and it is important to have some tables but these services southbound in the morning and northbound in the evening are very busy with commuters from Manchester so would it not have been better to perhaps have 2 standard class coaches with just/mostly tables and 2 with very few or no tables, this way you get the tables for the leisure travellers and lots of seats for commuters.
 

absolutelymilk

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2015
Messages
1,239
I agree that seats lined up with windows is very good and it is important to have some tables but these services southbound in the morning and northbound in the evening are very busy with commuters from Manchester so would it not have been better to perhaps have 2 standard class coaches with just/mostly tables and 2 with very few or no tables, this way you get the tables for the leisure travellers and lots of seats for commuters.
The theory is that once Northerns new units arrive and Manchester-Preston electrification is completed, most commuters will go on Northern to get to Preston (helped by restrictions at Bolton). Whether that will happen remains to be seen, but that is the reasoning behind it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top