• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Should disabled users upgraded to first class receive the full first class offering?

Status
Not open for further replies.

driver_m

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2011
Messages
2,248
I will be play devils advocate for a moment.

Do people who have said that the refreshments should be provided as a gesture of goodwill because the person is disabled. Does your answer change if the person is in a wheelchair because they've only got a temporary issue, say a broken leg?

No* (misread it) , one of my colleagues was temporarily in a chair through a severe back issue that eventually was repaired, but if they need some kind of assistance, particularly where it's pre arranged, then they're obviously in a bad way . For a straightforward broken leg, you shouldn't really need a wheelchair when a set of crutches do the job. Again if you want to milk something by exaggerating a health issue, then you need to assess your life as well.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

sw1ller

Established Member
Joined
4 Jan 2013
Messages
1,567
How is this even a question?? Someone’s been upgraded to 1st because there’s no adequate seating in standard, a choice made by the TOC. They’ve been UPGRADED. Simple as that. The only issue is when more than 1 person wants to use the facility. Can a group of 5 not travel together in 2019? That’s what I find hard to believe.
 

driver_m

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2011
Messages
2,248
How is this even a question?? Someone’s been upgraded to 1st because there’s no adequate seating in standard, a choice made by the TOC. They’ve been UPGRADED. Simple as that. The only issue is when more than 1 person wants to use the facility. Can a group of 5 not travel together in 2019? That’s what I find hard to believe.

+1, upgrade is the key word here .
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
How is this even a question?? Someone’s been upgraded to 1st because there’s no adequate seating in standard, a choice made by the TOC. They’ve been UPGRADED. Simple as that. The only issue is when more than 1 person wants to use the facility. Can a group of 5 not travel together in 2019? That’s what I find hard to believe.

They can’t really on any train unless half of them want to stand.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
20,389
Location
0035
Yeah, this design does mean that a wheelchair user can't travel as part of a group, unless the rest of the group are prepared to pay for First. Not ideal. But I agree with the comments above that given this layout, providing catering makes sense.
Is this even legal? I would be interested to see how it works in reality. I suspect TPx don't want to put it in writing due to potential abuse but would hope that the staff on the ground would possibly be more lenient and accepting that it would not be morally justifiable to split up a group like this.
 
Joined
4 May 2012
Messages
309
Good to see it is this way round. I note on the "refreshed" class 444s on SWR there remains no wheelchair space in 1st as was the case previously. Does a first class ticket holder in a wheelchair get downgraded on SWR? Although with the new 2+2 seating why pay extra anyway?
 

tsr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
7,400
Location
Between the parallel lines
To be honest, I wish more TOCs had features of the train such as the wheelchair spaces, accessible toilet and First Class clustered together. You could even do what a few other countries’ railways have done, and provide a dedicated space nearby for any passengers who feel vulnerable travelling on their own (eg. some passengers travelling on their own late at night). This would mean that there would be one specific area of the train needing a higher staff presence, which would then be more easily defined and therefore patrolled by the crew, especially if it’s really busy.

(Obviously if you are doing guard dispatch then sometimes certain other positions would be needed due to platform length/curvature, but that could also neatly coincide with ad-hoc patrols of the rest of the train anyway.)

As for upgrading people to First - the vast majority of rail users (and even some rail staff) might be surprised just how often this is done for a variety of reasons. I’ve done it for many different scenarios, including providing a quieter space for distressed passengers; making First Class look busy in order to deter casual fare evasion through sections of journeys with frequent stops; aircon failure in Standard Class; heavy delays meaning people need power sockets to charge phones... you name it really. Having wheelchair users in there is probably a good thing all round for customer service, and the numbers travelling with more than one or two companions will be slim. The cost to the company should be minimal, if not in profit via good PR. There have been a few cases I’ve come across where it would be inappropriate, but very very few.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,585
I will be play devils advocate for a moment.

Do people who have said that the refreshments should be provided as a gesture of goodwill because the person is disabled. Does your answer change if the person is in a wheelchair because they've only got a temporary issue, say a broken leg?

Absolutely not. The best way I can think to explain myself is as follows.

Staff with 1st travel facilities at my TOC are entitled to tea, coffee, water and juice.

The policy says so as to offer a great, friendly service other items might be offered but should be politely refused, creating a friendly atmosphere in the carriage.

How mealy mouthed therefore would it look to ignore or even worse verbally deny someone a drink because they're in a wheelchair, given they couldn't be briefed not to accept anyway?

It's a tiny cost so just get on with it.
 

PeterC

Established Member
Joined
29 Sep 2014
Messages
4,082
I would say that it depends on the total first class offering. Light refreshments, no problem; but if the offer included a cooked meal and wine say?
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
10,022
Location
here to eternity
whilst it's unfair to full paying First Class passengers

I think that any able bodied "full paying First Class passenger" who thinks that's its unfair should really think about how unfair it is that some people through no fault of their own end up in a wheelchair! Some perspective is needed here!
 

swaldman

Member
Joined
19 Jan 2013
Messages
375
I would say that it depends on the total first class offering. Light refreshments, no problem; but if the offer included a cooked meal and wine say?

*shrug* It's not exactly a huge expense for the TOC. I don't see the problem. If other first class passengers are upset, that's their problem, and they should probably have a think about their attitude ;)
 

mmh

Established Member
Joined
13 Aug 2016
Messages
3,744
At the end of the day, whilst it's unfair to full paying First Class passengers, TPE shouldnt've put the only wheelchair provision in First Class.

It seems to make perfect sense to me, keeps the number of spaces provided to a minimum. In an ideal world if we had a standard design or positioning across different train types it'd also mean platform staff would know exactly where to assist someone on or off in advance.

But then I don't understand the obsession some seem to have on here with the idea that different people may have (they will have!) paid different prices for their tickets.
 

ForTheLoveOf

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2017
Messages
6,416
It seems to make perfect sense to me, keeps the number of spaces provided to a minimum. In an ideal world if we had a standard design or positioning across different train types it'd also mean platform staff would know exactly where to assist someone on or off in advance.

But then I don't understand the obsession some seem to have on here with the idea that different people may have (they will have!) paid different prices for their tickets.
Indeed, if we follow that line of thought, then why shouldn't the holder of an Anytime Return be allowed into First Class for free - after all, they may quite well have paid considerably more than the holder of a First Class Advance!

Pricing structure and fares has very little to do with entitlement to (travel) benefits.
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
I will be play devils advocate for a moment.

Do people who have said that the refreshments should be provided as a gesture of goodwill because the person is disabled. Does your answer change if the person is in a wheelchair because they've only got a temporary issue, say a broken leg?

No - but if they are in there anyway then why not? You could say that buy not providing it they are actually making the situation worse by pointing it out to the rest of the carriage.

Its a cup of tea and a biscuit - its not the end of the world.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
At the end of the day, whilst it's unfair to full paying First Class passengers, TPE shouldnt've put the only wheelchair provision in First Class.

It's about wheelchair users feeling included and valued, not just being dumped next to the toilet like is usually the case. Travelling as a wheelchair user is generally a rubbish experience as it is (e.g. basic stuff like worrying if someone will even be at your alighting station to greet you with a ramp, moving around busy stations, etc.)
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,585
At the end of the day, whilst it's unfair to full paying First Class passengers, TPE shouldnt've put the only wheelchair provision in First Class.

By that measure anyone travelling on a lesser fare in first class than a First Anytime ticket (IE anything off peak or advance) is unfair to those full fare passengers (don't even get me started on free passes, upgrades and competition winners ).

What happens with a few consumables is nobody's business bar the TOC and their employees and if done with due care attention no one in first class will ever know otherwise.
 

LOL The Irony

On Moderation
Joined
29 Jul 2017
Messages
5,335
Location
Chinatown, New York
By that measure anyone travelling on a lesser fare in first class than a First Anytime ticket (IE anything off peak or advance) is unfair to those full fare passengers (don't even get me started on free passes, upgrades and competition winners ).

What happens with a few consumables is nobody's business bar the TOC and their employees and if done with due care attention no one in first class will ever know otherwise.
It's about wheelchair users feeling included and valued, not just being dumped next to the toilet like is usually the case. Travelling as a wheelchair user is generally a rubbish experience as it is (e.g. basic stuff like worrying if someone will even be at your alighting station to greet you with a ramp, moving around busy stations, etc.)
It seems to make perfect sense to me, keeps the number of spaces provided to a minimum. In an ideal world if we had a standard design or positioning across different train types it'd also mean platform staff would know exactly where to assist someone on or off in advance.

But then I don't understand the obsession some seem to have on here with the idea that different people may have (they will have!) paid different prices for their tickets.
I think that any able bodied "full paying First Class passenger" who thinks that's its unfair should really think about how unfair it is that some people through no fault of their own end up in a wheelchair! Some perspective is needed here!
I think you'll all find I'm blaming TPE for their stupidity that will cause issues and confusion in future and in no way am I blaming those in a wheelchair.
 

DanDaDriver

Member
Joined
5 May 2018
Messages
338
I would like to think I live in a society where the disabled passenger would be served first but clearly not

In a previous career I used to have regular disability awareness training. One of the things that was repeated most by guest speakers was that things like this (being served first) whilst well meaning are actually quite patronising and demeaning after a while.

Yes have a free tea or coffee or whatever, if you’ve been upgraded you’ve been upgraded, it’s ridiculous to be treated differently. But being treated like a terminally ill memeber of a visiting royal family all day must be incredibly wearing.

It’s about equality of outcome, ie; being carried to your destination safely, comfortably and with dignity. So if the TOC can’t accomodate you in standard and has decided that you will be carried by default in first, then you are a first class passenger so fill your boots with biscuits.


Also, playing devils advocate for a moment, the people who’ve made the point that the first class refreshments are just going to be thrown away anyway, the train is still going to be going to the same place whether or not you have paid for a ticket. Classic fare dodgers argument ;)
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
I think you'll all find I'm blaming TPE for their stupidity that will cause issues and confusion in future and in no way am I blaming those in a wheelchair.

So purposefully going the extra mile for those unfortunate enough to be of impaired mobility is 'stupidity' in your eyes?
 

Modron

Member
Joined
5 Feb 2019
Messages
202
Don't forget that there are people who don't use wheelchairs, yet are classed as disabled for whatever reason.

My answer is a straight yes, as they have been upgraded.
 

mmh

Established Member
Joined
13 Aug 2016
Messages
3,744
I think you'll all find I'm blaming TPE for their stupidity that will cause issues and confusion in future and in no way am I blaming those in a wheelchair.

How will it cause confusion? If you're in a wheelchair you can only board the train where the staff put the ramp. No confusion.
 

VT 390

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2018
Messages
1,366
But if the train company is not providing standard class wheelchair spaces that does seem a little unfair, particularly as it is only tea and biscuits. We are not talking a full meal
But TPE may start to offer more food offerings in the 397's, why else would they put a kitchen in.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,744
Location
Yorkshire
Indeed, if we follow that line of thought, then why shouldn't the holder of an Anytime Return be allowed into First Class for free - after all, they may quite well have paid considerably more than the holder of a First Class Advance!
Well they are on Virgin at weekends ;) but you're right, the price paid is an irrelevance.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,744
Location
Yorkshire
At the end of the day, whilst it's unfair to full paying First Class passengers, TPE shouldnt've put the only wheelchair provision in First Class
Well they have so if anyone thinks it's unfair they can elect to go in Standard class instead. As others have said, no-one other than staff & the individual customer concerned should know whether or not someone received a complimentary upgrade or not.
 

LOL The Irony

On Moderation
Joined
29 Jul 2017
Messages
5,335
Location
Chinatown, New York
Well they have so if anyone thinks it's unfair they can elect to go in Standard class instead. As others have said, no-one other than staff & the individual customer concerned should know whether or not someone received a complimentary upgrade or not.
I guess this all came from not making my view on this clear enough for people to understand my opinion on it.
 

Master29

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
1,969
Actually both the carer and wheelchair user get full upgrade and by that it means the complimantaries that come with this. I noticed this on Eurostar too with no wheelchair spaces on the new class 374`s.
 

SussexMan

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2010
Messages
477
I'm wondering what it means for passengers accompanying a wheelchair user - While I can't see any objection being raised to one companion, I can't imagine that TPE would be impressed with half a dozen people trying to accompany a wheelchair user into first

Yeah, this design does mean that a wheelchair user can't travel as part of a group, unless the rest of the group are prepared to pay for First. Not ideal. But I agree with the comments above that given this layout, providing catering makes sense.

Parent with two or more children... How will that work when either the parent of one of the children is a wheelchair user? They will have to all be upgraded.


However, I think the most aggrieved people will be the wheelchair users who buy first class tickets! Presumably they are expecting something more than if they bought a std class ticket....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top