• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

TPE WCML service changes from May 2019

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
18,006
Location
Airedale
TPE could have been using DRS Mk2s and Class 68s to cover for lack of 185s. Would be getting driver/guard training/handling on LHCS and moving passengers.

Slam-door stock at the end of its lifespan (to put it mildly) - and non-accessible to boot, just like the Mk3 sets which TPE have already been given grief over.
I would, if I were TPE rather have the bad PR from the postponement....
 

EE Andy b1

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2013
Messages
1,212
Location
CLC
I would, if I were TPE rather have the bad PR from the postponement....

Well I think they have got plenty of that and the farce goes on.
Crush, crush, crush.
Do we really think the complaints and bad publicity will stop when 3 types of new train enter service?
No I don't think so. Look at other TOCs.
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
5,096
Slam-door stock at the end of its lifespan (to put it mildly) - and non-accessible to boot, just like the Mk3 sets which TPE have already been given grief over.
I would, if I were TPE rather have the bad PR from the postponement....
They deserve all the grief they get, having not honoured the franchise commitment to introduce the Mk3 trains they promised. Any coaches that run reliably and move people are welcome (besides releasing units for other services.) If the actual stock had been timetabled and advertised then disability access could have been managed. It's no surprise that their ticket sales have collapsed* (*if what we read here is true.)
A franchise holder that was committed to running the services promised using initiative to address problems would be welcome, rather than one just looking after their bottom line. Maybe we need to get rid of the franchises and recognise that it is infrastructure where profits are not (should not be) the highest priority.
The (obvious) reasons that crush will continue is that demand is currently suppressed by the shortage of capacity and timetable problems in the last year. Once the public think these have been addressed by the introduction of new trains there will be a massive surge in useage... I hope that they double or triple capacity in a very rapid ramping up of seat numbers on the trans-Pennine axis or we will have a lot more disappointed people.
 

Mathew S

Established Member
Joined
7 Aug 2017
Messages
2,167
I would, if I were TPE rather have the bad PR from the postponement....
Why would they get any bad PR? They never actually announced the services would start from May anyway. It's hardly like many (normal, not on this forum) people are going to have been looking on RTT and seen what's happened.
 

PR1Berske

Established Member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
3,025
Missing out St Helens seems very unfair. I have to disagree with an earlier post: Wigan has enough connection options to make omitting it far more logical. St Helens has no "destinations", if you will, only places to go to change. That really should be improved.
 

driver_m

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2011
Messages
2,248
There's a 397 sat on Crewe LNWR and appears not to have moved for some time... TPE don't exactly appear to be all hands at the pump regarding training do they? @EE Andy b1 has called it right for me.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,652
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Why would they get any bad PR? They never actually announced the services would start from May anyway. It's hardly like many (normal, not on this forum) people are going to have been looking on RTT and seen what's happened.

TPE were deliberately vague in their public announcements at franchise award about capacity enhancement, such as "44 new trains/220 new vehicles by 2019".
However, Liverpool-Glasgow was promised from December 2018.
They also had "the first new trains will be delivered in Spring 2018". Delivered probably doesn't technically mean "in service".
But they did also promise the 2xMk3 rakes in service by the end of 2017, in the franchise agreement.
https://www.tpexpress.co.uk/media-centre/news/2016/april/new-transpennine-express-franchise-launches
 

BeHereNow

Guest
Joined
30 Dec 2017
Messages
308
The train service requirement in the Franchise Agreement isn't vague and its difficult to see how they would achieve those capacity numbers with 3 car trains. Impossible you might say!
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
5,096
The train service requirement in the Franchise Agreement isn't vague and its difficult to see how they would achieve those capacity numbers with 3 car trains. Impossible you might say!
Recent history suggests that they aren't very worried by franchise commitments, and the "regulators" seem to be equally casual about deliverables.
 

geoffk

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2010
Messages
3,243
Ugh TPE have amended all their Bolton services to pass through.
Isn't it a franchise requirement to call at Bolton? I assume this is a temporary arrangement until the class 397s start. In the latest "Today's Railways UK", I read "Network Rail, Northern and TransPennine Express have announced a £1 million package of upgrades to Bolton station". TPE would not be contributing if they didn't intend to call there!
 

thealexweb

Member
Joined
5 Jan 2014
Messages
956
Isn't it a franchise requirement to call at Bolton? I assume this is a temporary arrangement until the class 397s start. In the latest "Today's Railways UK", I read "Network Rail, Northern and TransPennine Express have announced a £1 million package of upgrades to Bolton station". TPE would not be contributing if they didn't intend to call there!

Yeah I imagine the calls will be put back in at some point in the future. I hope its not going to be the December 2019 timetable change.
 

BMIFlyer

Member
Joined
13 Mar 2017
Messages
723
The calls are not going to happen whilst the line speed is 75mph instead of 100mph.
 

185143

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2013
Messages
4,506
The calls are not going to happen whilst the line speed is 75mph instead of 100mph.
The linespeed must be 100mph now. I clocked 90mph on a 319 a couple of weeks back on my phone's GPS-The conductor confirmed the cab speedo reflected that.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Fares Advisor
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
23,367
Location
Bolton
Hi 1629 GLC-Liverpool is a ECS move.
Liverpool to Glasgow services have now been amended in the data upload to 5xxx to take them off sale. I understand the plan to run these from the change date has been scrapped. Possibly sensible.
The linespeed must be 100mph now. I clocked 90mph on a 319 a couple of weeks back on my phone's GPS-The conductor confirmed the cab speedo reflected that.
Network Rail announced a couple of weeks ago that the permissible speed increases had finally been signed off, and the blanket 75 miles/hour restriction for electrict had been lifted.

I have also personally clocked >75 through the unofficial (not particularly accurate) means of GPS.

Yeah I imagine the calls will be put back in at some point in the future. I hope its not going to be the December 2019 timetable change.
Isn't it a franchise requirement to call at Bolton? I assume this is a temporary arrangement until the class 397s start. In the latest "Today's Railways UK", I read "Network Rail, Northern and TransPennine Express have announced a £1 million package of upgrades to Bolton station". TPE would not be contributing if they didn't intend to call there!

Again, the previous plan to have specific services call at Bolton from the change date has clearly been scrapped. However, one single TransPennine Express service to Bolton is actually on sale. 1M99 on Sundays, 1412 departure from Edinburgh:
BON.JPG

So there ought to be at least one service calling there.

Finally it is worthy of note that 2012 Liverpool Lime Street to Oxenholme Lake District, which had been due to call at St Helens Central, Wigan North Western, Preston and Lancaster has not been withdrawn. This implies this is a part of a diagram which will continue to run even if the Glasgow services cannot. But then who knows. They are currently selling that train though.
 
Last edited:

driver_m

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2011
Messages
2,248
Ironically enough. The first Liverpool Glasgow train in a long time could well be a VT one again! Have a look on the 27th May. There are at least 2 services in there. Must be for engineering but unusal to say the least.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top