ChiefPlanner
Established Member
Dovey Junction - Ynyslas / Borth must be quite at risk - badly damaged in 1975 but thankfully restored. Also the Cambrian from DJ towards Aberdovey.
The value of property in the wider area is much lower than the UK average. £75m would be my guess for the real value of the 450 homes. If Fairbourne was a town of 10,000 or 20,000 people then a Dutch scheme would make sense. Its just 450 homes on land that is barely above sea level and surrounded on three sides by the sea and a river estuary. Its easy to see why the decision to abandon Fairbourne has been made. Gwynedd Council should not be paying compensation. A demolition and compensation scheme should be funded by the Welsh Government (environment being a devolved area).
If the council is the body required to pay for flood defences, it should also be the body required to compensate people when it fails to pay for said flood defences.
Otherwise you create a perverse incentive where the council would simply condemn everything because they aren't paying the bill for that, but do pay the bill for not condemning.
And £75m will buy you quite a bit of flood defence.....
No idea - maybe we've got very powerful icebreakers now!Sir John Franklin set off in 1845 to find the North West Passage. As everyone knows he was frozen in and his expedition came to grief. In the 19th century no-one ever succeeded in getting through from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Ever. However today cruise ships do it every summer. Funny that. I wonder what changed? Why has all the ice suddenly gone away?
The mortgage needs to be paid back no matter what happens.No idea - I see my point above regarding the Maldives has gone unanswered - would big money invest in long term investments at sea level if there was any possibility of risk? It would be impossible to get a mortgage anywhere east of Doncaster or even in London!
It is correct that the melting of ice that is already in the ocean does not directly contribute to sea level rise. The two main factors causing sea level rise are thermal expansion and the melting of land based ice.Wherever it's gone it's not gone into increased sea level..
If the council is the body required to pay for flood defences, it should also be the body required to compensate people when it fails to pay for said flood defences.
Otherwise you create a perverse incentive where the council would simply condemn everything because they aren't paying the bill for that, but do pay the bill for not condemning.
And £75m will buy you quite a bit of flood defence.....
It's just a hunch but my guess is that no lines will be lost to climate change and in 30 years time the usual eco-nutters will still be banging on hysterically about the impending climate emergency, just like they've been doing for the past 30 years.
We"ve all read the story of The Boy Who Cried Wolf, haven't we?
My hunch as well, and there are plenty of "Top scientists" who agree or at least are uncomfortable with the alarmist hysteria.
So please don't "be quiet"!
If global warming, resulting in climate change, is not taking place then 150 years of physics is wrong. Expecting a sea level rise of 20m is being realistic. Alarmism is saying it could happen within 50 years.
(Editted because I accidentally hit the ‘post’ button)
There is a simple answer. If you look at the age band of the investors, they are happy to get a return in their life time / career span the **** it once they've got their pension!No idea - maybe we've got very powerful icebreakers now!
Wherever it's gone it's not gone into increased sea level, if you grew up in a coastal town or on an island, and are of a certain age, you would know that.
I see my point above regarding the Maldives has gone unanswered - would big money invest in long term investments at sea level if there was any possibility of risk? It would be impossible to get a mortgage anywhere east of Doncaster or even in London! You can be sure that the people behind big money will know a damn sight more than the likes of you and me - they're not worried - they know fine it's garbage - it's a scam. The reasons for the scam can only be guessed at by people at our level.
So to keep on topic - the railways are fine!
It's just a hunch but my guess is that no lines will be lost to climate change and in 30 years time the usual eco-nutters will still be banging on hysterically about the impending climate emergency, just like they've been doing for the past 30 years.
We"ve all read the story of The Boy Who Cried Wolf, haven't we?
Many years ago I was involved in producing sea level rise maps, now it will take seconds, back then it took weeks.
Doncaster would be a seaside town with a 5m rise.
I really hope that's a joke.The answers easy, store all the extra water in plastic bottles.