• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Caledonian Sleeper

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,846
Location
Yorkshire
Is there a loco with them? There will of course be a plan to get them moved but it’ll depend on having a driver or drivers with appropriate route/traction knowledge and sufficient hours of work available, and requesting and obtaining a schedule from Network Rail...

There wasn't a proper loco, but there was a mini one that isn't TOPS registered AFAIK.

They've been out and through the lathe twice.

20190615_195731.jpg
 

Clayton

On Moderation
Joined
15 Apr 2018
Messages
259
Top hotels have dozens of staff and decades of practice and don’t move ... I bet they’re trying to do the ‘hotel on wheels ‘ with a skeleton crew and not much stored up expertise. Recipe for disaster
 

Mathew S

Established Member
Joined
7 Aug 2017
Messages
2,167
GBRF-liveried 92043 ready to pull the set away.
Seems to have come up from Crewe at lunchtime (I had a look on RTT when I went past and saw it there this afternoon). What I couldn't see was a path for it to take the repaired coaches away from Longsight.
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,846
Location
Yorkshire
Seems to have come up from Crewe at lunchtime (I had a look on RTT when I went past and saw it there this afternoon). What I couldn't see was a path for it to take the repaired coaches away from Longsight.

I'm guessing the return will be another VSTP, so it can be anyone's guess really. I go past there pretty much everyday so I can see any movements or loco attachments and report anything interesting.

For anyone interested in the light loco path:

http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O14637/2019/06/17/advanced
 

option

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2017
Messages
636
Anytime Single from Edinburgh to London is £161.50. I haven't seen a CS bed for less than that recently, this being the case a refund probably actually is best. If you get an Advance or can go off-peak (£20 cheaper) you're really quids in.

It's the seated passengers who will be really stuck, as that's far cheaper than any day train fare - I guess that'd be Megabus or bust - or take CS's coach.

though card refunds take days, could easily be 5-10 days.

They should be getting everyone, that doesn't want to cancel, to their destination & be refunding them.
 

MrEd

Member
Joined
13 Jan 2019
Messages
587
Top hotels have dozens of staff and decades of practice and don’t move ... I bet they’re trying to do the ‘hotel on wheels ‘ with a skeleton crew and not much stored up expertise. Recipe for disaster

I don’t think the crews (in terms of on-train crews) on the Mk5 sets are ‘skeleton’, as (as far as I know) they have the same complement of staff as an 8-coach Mk2/Mk3 set (which has probably remained consistent since BR days), with three hosts (1 for every two sleepers), a team leader in the lounge and a safety critical train manager. The question, however, which you rightly address is whether this is enough staff to deal with the complexities of Mk5 operation (and particularly with Mk5 catering, especially with the room service option). My suspicion is that it is not, and that perhaps one or two more hosts in the lounge might not be a bad idea. (On the Highlander these extra staff could perhaps just work between London and Preston and Inverness/Fort William and Edinburgh, to cope with peak demand in the lounge). I also think that much more thorough staff training should have been carried out on the Mk5s.

On another point, I’m beginning to think that the introduction date of 7th July on the Highlander is looking very ambitious in the light of the current situation. It would be better (in my view) to delay the introduction until August/September to allow more time for crew familiarisation and the resolution of the numerous faults with the Mk5s.
 

TimboM

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2016
Messages
3,732
Just passed Longsight again. The Sleeper cars are in exactly the same position as last night.

If the work has been completed I do wonder why they can’t get them down to London or Edinburgh (can’t remember which one they’ve cancelled) to run a service tonight.
They will be moved when they are ready.
92043 is the loco now in attendance.

I'm guessing the return will be another VSTP, so it can be anyone's guess really. I go past there pretty much everyday so I can see any movements or loco attachments and report anything interesting.

For anyone interested in the light loco path:

http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O14637/2019/06/17/advanced
That wasn't a light engine move - 92043 was hauling Club Car 15105 and sleeper 15332. They are two coaches which escaped unscathed but need to be reunited with the ones at Longsight to reform up the half-set.
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,846
Location
Yorkshire
They will be moved when they are ready.
92043 is the loco now in attendance.

That wasn't a light engine move - 92043 was hauling Club Car 15105 and sleeper 15332. They are two coaches which escaped unscathed but need to be reunited with the ones at Longsight to reform up the half-set.

Ahh yes of course, it's a '5' headcode - my bad!
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,323
Location
Stirlingshire
Perhaps next time there is a problem Serco should rustle up some of their Prisoner Escort Vehicles to convey people in.

By the sound of anecdotal evidence it would not be much of a drop in comfort levels !!
 

USRailFan

Member
Joined
2 May 2011
Messages
341
Location
Norway
Perhaps next time there is a problem Serco should rustle up some of their Prisoner Escort Vehicles to convey people in.

By the sound of anecdotal evidence it would not be much of a drop in comfort levels !!

How many usable Mk5s are there? Enough for a trade with GWR for their refurb Mk3s, with the rest going for spares?
 

marks87

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2010
Messages
1,609
Location
Dundee
How many usable Mk5s are there? Enough for a trade with GWR for their refurb Mk3s, with the rest going for spares?

Why are you obsessed with CS ditching the Mk5s?

The other day on the other thread you were wanting them scrapped; now they're off to GWR for some bizarre reason.

They're here to say. They need work, sure, but they're still definitely here to stay.
 

option

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2017
Messages
636
I understand what you are saying, however they should have been tested in a live environment after they were passed as safe for passenger use.

The idea of a stepchange in quality/standards/operations such as this not being stress tested to the max is ludicrous

Even having them parked up somewhere & on shore power, then 'running' a fully occupied, overnight service would have tested most of the systems & services.

Better than that would have been to build a static carriage interior, & then test all the cabin systems. It's the way it's done for a lot of construction.
 

Steve Harris

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2016
Messages
891
Location
ECML
Better than that would have been to build a static carriage interior, & then test all the cabin systems. It's the way it's done for a lot of construction.
Unfortunately a static test won't tell you if the lip on a shower tray is big enough to contain the wave action of water within it on a moving train.

So although some systems can be tested statically, some systems (like doors coming open and shower trays holding water) will deffently need testing in a live environment.
 

bastien

Member
Joined
14 Aug 2016
Messages
427
Even having them parked up somewhere & on shore power, then 'running' a fully occupied, overnight service would have tested most of the systems & services.

Better than that would have been to build a static carriage interior, & then test all the cabin systems. It's the way it's done for a lot of construction.
Are we saying they didn't do any soft launch testing? I'm sure there are plenty of folks here who would've loved the chance to spend the night on a train parked up at Crewe or wherever!
 

Highlandspring

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2017
Messages
2,778
I don’t think anyone who is speculating here has a clue what ‘passenger comfort’ type testing was done by Serco and CAF during the development and commissioning process. Including me.
 

option

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2017
Messages
636
Unfortunately a static test won't tell you if the lip on a shower tray is big enough to contain the wave action of water within it on a moving train.

So although some systems can be tested statically, some systems (like doors coming open and shower trays holding water) will deffently need testing in a live environment.


One of the reports was that the shower water was puddling, which means that it's not draining away quick enough.
If you look at the drain used, & it's position, it's obvious that any tilt, in any direction, will move water away from the drain.


Look at a bathroom (an accessible one) on the QM2, & the drain is much bigger, & the water to the right of it can't go anywhere but down the drain. There is also a much larger 'drainage hole' area.
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,435
There's a fairly substantial lip at the bottom of the door frame which contains any pooling of water. It did puddle a but but disappeared pretty quickly when I used the shower.
I see lots of concerns about water leaking into the sleeping area, but nobody has actually said they've first hand experience of that happening.
 

BRX

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
3,602
One of the reports was that the shower water was puddling, which means that it's not draining away quick enough.
If you look at the drain used, & it's position, it's obvious that any tilt, in any direction, will move water away from the drain.


Look at a bathroom (an accessible one) on the QM2, & the drain is much bigger, & the water to the right of it can't go anywhere but down the drain. There is also a much larger 'drainage hole' area.
Agree with you there. There are various things that don't look like great design. Like, why are the shower floor and the coved edge two separate pieces of material, instead of one, introducing a joint that can fail? And why is only one edge coved? I'm surprised that the bottom of the shower isn't a one-piece unit like a fibreglass tray or similar.
 

BRX

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
3,602
I don’t think anyone who is speculating here has a clue what ‘passenger comfort’ type testing was done by Serco and CAF during the development and commissioning process. Including me.

I think we do - not enough!
 

option

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2017
Messages
636
Agree with you there. There are various things that don't look like great design. Like, why are the shower floor and the coved edge two separate pieces of material, instead of one, introducing a joint that can fail? And why is only one edge coved? I'm surprised that the bottom of the shower isn't a one-piece unit like a fibreglass tray or similar.

That wooden panel on the left doesn't look like good design, nice gap under it to get splashed & stay damp.

Should have got one of the modular/pod bathroom suppliers to design it.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,540
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Agree with you there. There are various things that don't look like great design. Like, why are the shower floor and the coved edge two separate pieces of material, instead of one, introducing a joint that can fail? And why is only one edge coved? I'm surprised that the bottom of the shower isn't a one-piece unit like a fibreglass tray or similar.

That was my first thought - why isn't it a deep tray to ensure the water is retained.

And the build quality looks "Cheap As F...." :)
 

gordonjahn

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2010
Messages
144
That was my first thought - why isn't it a deep tray to ensure the water is retained.

And the build quality looks "Cheap As F...." :)
My guess would be that it double as the bathroom - sitting in a shower tray when you go to the toilet of an evening might not be the right vibe either!
 

Top