• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Tube future notions

Status
Not open for further replies.

simple simon

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
651
Location
Suburban London
To make a Wimbleware service viable the key is solving the conflict between Wimbleware and Districts at Earls Court (they cross each other on the flat going East right now).

It is an enormous shame that literally right now, to the west of Earls Court, there is a once in a century opportunity to actually do this, because the entire exhibition centre has now been demolished meaning it would be possible to expose the tunnels and create the space needed for a new flyover, hiding and incorporating/hiding the new bridge behind/underneath the redevelopment.

But this is not happening, because money at TfL is too tight to justify it. There are capacity issues on the Wimbledon branch, and it does need more trains, but the strategy is to relieve it with £41bn for Crossrail 2 (which may never get built) rather than a couple hundred million (perhaps even with a developer contribution!) right now.

I very much agree.

I wonder, to solve the Edgware Road capacity issue, would it be possible to build the deep level tube line that the Metropolitan Rly had in mind when it rebuilt Edgware Road?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Dstock7080

Established Member
Joined
17 Feb 2010
Messages
2,767
Location
West London
Why is a third branch needed in the west when the other end of the line has just the one route?
As explained above, the relieve the District Line of the Ealing branch so to concentrate on the other services.
Piccadilly can reverse in the east at Cockfosters, Oakwood, Arnos Grove and Wood Green if required.
 

LUYMun

Member
Joined
15 Jul 2018
Messages
791
Location
Somewhere
Further Northern line extension from Battersea Power Station to Clapham Junction with one or two intermediate stations around Battersea and Albert Bridge.
This future notion will ease pressure on National Rail services going into London Waterloo or Victoria, and the London Overground's southern orbital line. It also is more convenient than Crossrail 2 because the Northern line already takes direct links to Central London.
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
13,142
The Northern Line would be overwhelmed if it went to Clapham Junction, given the number of people that would change there.

If the Underground is to serve Clapham Junction then a complete new line would be needed, rather than an extension of an existing one.
 

ijmad

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2016
Messages
1,810
Location
UK
The Northern Line would be overwhelmed if it went to Clapham Junction, given the number of people that would change there.

I think the planners agree, until Crossrail 2 is built, at which point it will attract away significant numbers of Northern Line passengers.

If the Underground is to serve Clapham Junction then a complete new line would be needed, rather than an extension of an existing one.

This is exactly what Crossrail 2 will be for those coming in on services to CJ who want to continue on in to the West End or the city.
 

BartTheAnorak

Member
Joined
27 Jul 2012
Messages
20
I think the planners agree, until Crossrail 2 is built, at which point it will attract away significant numbers of Northern Line passengers.



This is exactly what Crossrail 2 will be for those coming in on services to CJ who want to continue on in to the West End or the city.

Thus virtually emptying Victoria and Waterloo at surface level?
 

BartTheAnorak

Member
Joined
27 Jul 2012
Messages
20
More like allowing those terminals to cater for unmet demand on the non-CR2 branches.

I don't see the logic. It would leave pretty much no non-CR2 branches from the SWML (at least not terminating within the capital). Could help Victoria but only by having loads of people change at Clapham Junction. Very few northbound trains on the Southern route don't call there as I recall.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,385
I don't see the logic. It would leave pretty much no non-CR2 branches from the SWML (at least not terminating within the capital). Could help Victoria but only by having loads of people change at Clapham Junction. Very few northbound trains on the Southern route don't call there as I recall.
Post Crossrail 2 there are certain existing SWR services (about 7 or 8 that currently weave from slows to fasts in the Surbiton area) that will remain on the slows all the way into Waterloo. They will release space for additional longer distance services. Probably getting off topic for this discussion though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top