• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 484 replacing class 483 on the island line: progress updates

Status
Not open for further replies.

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,030
Image of interior
islandlinenewtrainsinside-990x555.jpg

https://www.islandecho.co.uk/interior-of-new-island-line-trains-revealed/
Think it's just a standard Vivarail rendering so can't read anything into it.

Article also quotes MP Bob Seeley saying future aspiration is for trains every 20 minutes.
That's the standard internal SWR colour scheme.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,273
Location
Fenny Stratford
i hope they are more reliable than our 230's on the Marston Vale. I advise Island line passengers to get some good walking shoes and a bus pass. ;)
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
6,844
i hope they are more reliable than our 230's on the Marston Vale. I advise Island line passengers to get some good walking shoes and a bus pass. ;)

Far fewer changes from the original D78s which were very reliable when withdrawn
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
i hope they are more reliable than our 230's on the Marston Vale. I advise Island line passengers to get some good walking shoes and a bus pass. ;)
Well theoretically they're not going to have the component that makes the 230 unreliable (the engine raft) so I'm quietly optimistic. The door issue will still need sorting though, especially on a journey with shorter end to end times.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,273
Location
Fenny Stratford
Far fewer changes from the original D78s which were very reliable when withdrawn

Well theoretically they're not going to have the component that makes the 230 unreliable (the engine raft) so I'm quietly optimistic. The door issue will still need sorting though, especially on a journey with shorter end to end times.

It is a positive in that new, better, more modern & more comfortable trains will be delivered to IOW passengers. It is great for Vivarail. I just wish they sorted our trains out before launching new ones becuase ours are a disgrace
 

Rick1984

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2012
Messages
1,034
I'm hoping they get a decent interior and not just the straight out the box option. Think more transverse seating would be popular as long as it wasn't too cramped like the current 483. Granted they're much smaller.
Air con would be good.
And as I've said a decent sized multi-use area
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,378
I agree - I can’t imagine why toilet provision is even being mentioned - certainly not while we have to cross our legs on longish mainland journeys. I often travel from Portsmouth to Brighton, and careful planning of fluid intake is needed there to avoid discomfort en route.
When the franchise award was announced, they were careful to state that the aim of “toilets on all their trains” definitely did not apply to the IOW. IIRC it wasn’t a DfT requirement of the ITT for mainland suburban services anyway, it was offered by First/MTR.
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
I'm hoping they get a decent interior and not just the straight out the box option. Think more transverse seating would be popular as long as it wasn't too cramped like the current 483. Granted they're much smaller.
Air con would be good.
And as I've said a decent sized multi-use area

The traditional D78 interior is absolutely fine, no one is travelling very far and longitudinal makes a lot of sense when so many people in summer are carrying luggage.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,513
Longitudinal is good for groups too as it is effectively a huge bay.
I do hope they do something imaginative with the exteriors and interiors, rather than corporate modern blandness. I know the primary purpose is local transport but jumping on the quirky little trains straight from the ferry is definitely a marketable product, particularly for families. The odd shaped yellow fronts defo look like penguins/daffy duck so use that for a start! It also makes them more ‘our trains’ for the locals.
The aspiration for 3tph presumably prevents sensible rationalisation, which IMO is a bit silly. That’s only sensible if the ferries go 3ph and I can’t see either ever being necessary.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
11,448
It’s a minefield. Browsing the various threads, including the general 230 one, you’d find Adrian Shooter of Vivarail quoted saying they definitely fit, followed a few posts later by someone else saying he was wrong...

When I was visiting Viva, the consensus was indeed that the D-Train would fit. I believe the suspension on the Class 230s is modified so that the ride height is higher, for the Class 484 this modification won't be made.
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
yes. Our trains are like an oven on hot days

The 484s will have twice as many doors as the Marston Vale 230s, shorter distances between stations and no hot diesel engines under the floor so I'd be surprised if it was an issue.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,030
Longitudinal is good for groups too as it is effectively a huge bay.
I do hope they do something imaginative with the exteriors and interiors, rather than corporate modern blandness. I know the primary purpose is local transport but jumping on the quirky little trains straight from the ferry is definitely a marketable product, particularly for families. The odd shaped yellow fronts defo look like penguins/daffy duck so use that for a start! It also makes them more ‘our trains’ for the locals.
The aspiration for 3tph presumably prevents sensible rationalisation, which IMO is a bit silly. That’s only sensible if the ferries go 3ph and I can’t see either ever being necessary.
You're going to be disappointed then. The computer render shows the standard SWR colour scheme. Logical really - the 483s when "new" had standard NSE interiors and I'd rather see the line as a serious part of the national rail network than some quirky novelty, at least while the trains are less than 60 years old.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,273
Location
Fenny Stratford
You're going to be disappointed then. The computer render shows the standard SWR colour scheme. Logical really - the 483s when "new" had standard NSE interiors and I'd rather see the line as a serious part of the national rail network than some quirky novelty, at least while the trains are less than 60 years old.

I do hope they do something imaginative with the exteriors and interiors, rather than corporate modern blandness.

I am sure they will folow what they have done on the Marston Vale line with little panels about each station, line history, local landmarks/attractions and some nice artwork. They are nice touches
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,030
The issue is that there aren't enough opening windows because two of the large windows have doors opening into them. If they had the same length of opener as 153s they'd be fine without.
And no droplights at the carriage ends, which provided much of the ventilation when on the Underground.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,513
You're going to be disappointed then. The computer render shows the standard SWR colour scheme. Logical really - the 483s when "new" had standard NSE interiors and I'd rather see the line as a serious part of the national rail network than some quirky novelty, at least while the trains are less than 60 years old.

What does seriousness gain that warrants losing the PR and tourist trade that quirky can bring?
The only useful bit is national ticketing, not colours etc
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,378
When I was visiting Viva, the consensus was indeed that the D-Train would fit. I believe the suspension on the Class 230s is modified so that the ride height is higher, for the Class 484 this modification won't be made.
Yes, and articles in Modern Railways quoting Shooter saying that they definitely fitted appeared relatively early in 2018, and were discussed in the main IOW thread at the time. For me, that was sufficient evidence, and I’m surprised the debate even continued until the last few days.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,384
Yes, and articles in Modern Railways quoting Shooter saying that they definitely fitted appeared relatively early in 2018, and were discussed in the main IOW thread at the time. For me, that was sufficient evidence, and I’m surprised the debate even continued until the last few days.
People don't like evidence or experts, believing fairy stories is more fun:)
 

xc170

Member
Joined
9 Feb 2008
Messages
815
What does seriousness gain that warrants losing the PR and tourist trade that quirky can bring?

Apart from enthusiasts travelling on the cheapest tickets they can find, just how many tourists do the current trains attract?

As for PR, yes, having a 1 train service because you're running the oldest trains in the UK has been great PR recently.

Whatever benefits the 38 stock have will be far outweighed by having a decent, modern train service.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,030
What does seriousness gain that warrants losing the PR and tourist trade that quirky can bring?
The only useful bit is national ticketing, not colours etc
Is there any evidence that the liveries used over the past 15 years ie a small part of the line's history, have contributed to higher ridership? What livery would the 484s have anyway? They'd look ridiculous in LT red.
 

DPWH

On Moderation
Joined
8 Sep 2016
Messages
244
Will there be enough of them? It's often seems to be the case that for microfleets the govt underspends now and leaves inadequate provision later.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top