• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Gateshead (GD) Locomotives

Status
Not open for further replies.

RichmondCommu

Established Member
Joined
23 Feb 2010
Messages
6,912
Location
Richmond, London
Hi everyone,

I'm curious to know why from memory (and photographs in books / YouTube) GD based locomotives always seemed to be filthy.

Thanks for reading this.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,077
Hi everyone,

I'm curious to know why from memory (and photographs in books / YouTube) GD based locomotives always seemed to be filthy.

Thanks for reading this.
It wasn't filth, it was patina!

I don't think this was something unique to Gateshead. Most 37s back in the day would be in a grubby state.
 

RichmondCommu

Established Member
Joined
23 Feb 2010
Messages
6,912
Location
Richmond, London
It wasn't filth, it was patina!

I don't think this was something unique to Gateshead. Most 37s back in the day would be in a grubby state.
I realise that the freight locomotives would be covered in dirt for obvious reasons, it was the class 47s that I was thinking of.
 

D1537

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
526
Having lived in the North (Yorkshire) and followed Class 47s for many years I was never aware of GD (passenger) 47s ever being particularly more dirty than those from any other depot. There was certainly the fact that they (for diagramming reasons) didn't spend as long on depot as other locomotives, and often didn't follow the coaches through the carriage washer at Heaton, but looking back through my photos from the time I can't really see any major differences.
 

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
2,487
When I was on ER, it was quite noticeable that the GD passenger engines were filthier (inside and out) than their counterparts at Haymarket and Finsbury Park.

The answer was that the staffing available to do cleaning differed by depot. Occasionally the Newcastle Division would ask us in the KX Division how many staff we employed on cleaning duties and it was always a much, much higher figure at KX/FP. Gateshead, apparently, really struggled to fill these posts as there was better paid work for unskilled labour elsewhere in Newcastle and, as a result, unfilled posts were always prone to being periodically abolished. They would then try and build a case to recruit more staff as a result of knowing our figures.

The time on each depot wasn't really a factor - it was the staff availability that was key. There was also a very clear and long established regime at KX that locomotives had, when possible, to be kept clean so the resources were provided to help the depots achieve that requirement.
 

Ianigsy

Member
Joined
12 May 2015
Messages
1,111
I think Gateshead probably lost a bit of prestige at dieselisation - the Deltics were split between Finsbury Park, York and Haymarket and their bread and butter passenger work became long distance inter-regionals.
 
Joined
7 Dec 2012
Messages
135
There was certainly the fact that they (for diagramming reasons) didn't spend as long on depot as other locomotives, and often didn't follow the coaches through the carriage washer at Heaton, but looking back through my photos from the time I can't really see any major differences.

I was under the impression that Gateshead had a carriage washer installed where the arrival flow would pass though it for the purpose of washing the locos as they arrived on shed.

Paul
 

D1537

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
526
I think Gateshead probably lost a bit of prestige at dieselisation - the Deltics were split between Finsbury Park, York and Haymarket and their bread and butter passenger work became long distance inter-regionals.

The Deltics were allocated to FP, HA and Gateshead. It was only very late in their career (1979?) that the GD and HA locomotives went to York, I think. Gateshead gained a load of 47/4s at the same time, mostly ex-FP, which pretty much ran the remainder of the East Coast passenger services that weren't Deltic-hauled (as indeed their existing allocation had been doing for many years).
 

D1537

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
526
I was under the impression that Gateshead had a carriage washer installed where the arrival flow would pass though it for the purpose of washing the locos as they arrived on shed.

Paul
It did. I don't know when it was installed, but was certainly there by the early 80s. It seemed to lie idle most of the time, although those who were more familiar with the area might know more.
 

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
2,487
I think Gateshead probably lost a bit of prestige at dieselisation - the Deltics were split between Finsbury Park, York and Haymarket and their bread and butter passenger work became long distance inter-regionals.

The NER Deltics were all Gateshead locos until they went to York in May 1979. Loco cleaning in the KX Division was done manually.
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,077
It did. I don't know when it was installed, but was certainly there by the early 80s. It seemed to lie idle most of the time, although those who were more familiar with the area might know more.
Thinking back, I do have some vague memory of the washer at GD being broken long term, but don't take my word for it.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,265
Thinking back, I do have some vague memory of the washer at GD being broken long term, but don't take my word for it.
Anything to do with the Metro lines going underneath?
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,265
You mean flooding the tunnels? I wouldn't have thought so. I think it was just broken.
I was thinking more in terms of the tunnel digging damaging the water supply.
 

randyrippley

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2016
Messages
5,132
Many many decades ago I can remember a description of Gateshead in an angling magazine:
"Gateshead: so smoky and dirty the ducks fly backwards to keep the muck out of their eyes"

sounds funnier if said with a Geordie accent....
 

O8yityityit

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2019
Messages
68
Location
Cheshire
I recall the problem was to do with the fact the metro tunnelling somehow damaged part of the drainage system for the washer. That would mean oil and diesel could flow straight into the ground and finally into the river Tyne below. As salmon had just started to return to the much cleaned up river the authorities were always keen on any spills.
 
Last edited:

Steamysandy

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2018
Messages
250
Location
Longniddry
Going back to steam days it was reckoned that Gatesheads A4s were only cleaned when they went to the Plant for shopping.
Photographic evidence shows 60002 and 60020 hauling prestige expresses ( Flying Scotsman and Heart of Midlothian respectively) in a total state of filth.Peter Townsend related that on one occasion an A4 from Gatesheads was cleaned at Kings Cross and it was reported it was thought it had been transferred!
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,077
I recall the problem was to do with the fact the metro tunnelling somehow damaged part of the drainage system for the washer. That would need oil and diesel could flow straight into the ground and finally into the river Tyne below. As salmon had just started to return to the much cleaned up river the authorities were always keen on any spills.
Every day is a school day!

Apologies to 43096 - looks like you called it right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top