• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Grant Shapps Staying

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
7,862
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
In fairness, I hate it that there is a whole succession of SoS Transport. Just as they are getting their feet under the table and starting to understand stuff and get control of the civil servants, they get moved. Having said that Grayling was in the post about 3 years iirc.
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
Remember we could have Grayling back! Apologies I know it's not yet April!
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,251
Location
Fenny Stratford
I follow Schapps on my twitter feed. Looks like he is staying at the DfT

that is a shame as he is useless. However he is no threat to the PM and is suitable obsequious in the presence of the great man. It really is the ministry of none of the talents
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
7,862
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
that is a shame as he is useless. However he is no threat to the PM and is suitable obsequious in the presence of the great man. It really is the ministry of none of the talents

Problem is there are not many engineers that go into politics. It needs someone who has a reasonable knowledge of engineering so does not get BS'd by the DafT civil servants.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,251
Location
Fenny Stratford
Problem is there are not many engineers that go into politics. It needs someone who has a reasonable knowledge of engineering so does not get BS'd by the DafT civil servants.

No it doesn't. It needs someone of at least moderate intelligence, sensible management experience, moral fibre and character. You don't need to be an expert. You need to be an executive, able to delegate, set strategy, define targets, take accountability and most importantly win funding from the exchequer.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
7,862
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
No it doesn't. It needs someone of at least moderate intelligence, sensible management experience, moral fibre and character. You don't need to be an expert. You need to be an executive, able to delegate, set strategy, define targets, take accountability and most importantly win funding from the exchequer.
Well I would argue with those attributes Grayling was probably better than Shapps.
 
Last edited:

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,439
Location
Farnham
I too am also just glad we’re rid of Chris Grayling.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,644
Location
Mold, Clwyd
There's been a switch lower down in the DfT, with Andrew Stephenson (Pendle MP) replacing Nus Ghani who was looking after HS2.
Boris did promise a dedicated minister for HS2 - maybe it's him.
The Stephensons have history over building Euston-Birmingham railways.
 

47271

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2015
Messages
2,983
Sorry to be pedantic, and I have little time for Tories with a dodgy past, but every time we have a thread about him we go all schnapps and Schweppes.

Shapps. His name is Shapps. The summit with a 'ps' at the end.
 

HH

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2009
Messages
4,505
Location
Essex
I feel that Grant Schnapps would be more palatable...
 

Beemax

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2018
Messages
141
Shapps' main obsession is General Aviation (private planes) rather than railways. That's why he wanted to stay in the job.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,136
Location
West Wiltshire
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/a-new-chapter-for-northern-transport

New on DfT website, speech from Grant Shapps
Covers various modes, but Railways section reads :

Railways
Nor has any other government invested in the railways like this since Victorian times and perhaps ever. We’re not only pumping £48 billion into this 5 year period on our railways – that’s just Network Rail, that’s just the regular stuff if you like.

But we’re also taking really decisive action on our railways.

Let’s talk about Northern for a moment if we can.

As you know, just last month I said it was time for this Northern service to be sorted out, and we’ve brought it back into the public sector at least for the time being.

Realistically it’s going to take time. Simply handing it to the operator of last resort is not going to resolve Northern’s problems.

But I know that Robin Gisby and Richard George, who are heading up this public sector operator, are going to be wholly focused on delivering real and tangible changes, and I’ve asked them to do it as quickly as possible, whilst understanding they won’t be able to work overnight miracles.

And while they’re doing that we are of course working towards what I call the Williams world white paper, where Keith Williams has been working on those plans to dramatically improve services across the entire network. I’m absolutely convinced that the level of fragmentation that exists in our railways at the moment, whilst successful in for example doubling the number of passengers, doubling the passenger miles and making our railways go through this extraordinary renaissance that we are seeing today, it’s just too damn complicated to run a railway with this level of capacity constraint because of all those extra services in the modern world.

And that’s why what Keith Williams is doing is absolutely essential and I’m looking forward to publishing that white paper before too long.

Now those of us who spent our formative years during the 1980s, will know it was a great time for music.

It was great time for fashion – at least for some.

But I’ll put it out there, I don’t think it was a classic moment for train design in UK and particularly in the north of England.

I am of course talking about the pacers.

I would echo the Prime Minister in saying:

I like buses but not when they’re supposed to be trains.

And that of course is the pacer, they are finally coming off the network. Three of them have just gone to a variety of different charities - a mental health charity, a school, a library, so we can remember them and future generations can come and see what it was like when we ran buses on the rails. But I will be very pleased to see the back of those trains.

But I have to say there are 2 things that strike fear into my heart every time I hear that the railway is going to be improved – and those are:

Don’t worry minister we are going to improve the timetable.

Which means the timetable won’t be running for quite some time. And:

Don’t worry we are going to introduce new trains.

Yesterday on the way here I had the pleasure of being on I think a class 331, which of course was brand new, lovely, warm, comfortable, with wi-fi, plug in for your phone. And broken down.

But I do find that we have a problem when we introduce new trains, that they go through these very significant teething problems which always means we over-estimate the improvements the public will see.

Those problems aside, the renaissance of the railway I think is very significant as I have been trying to describe.

Beeching
Beyond just the improvements in rolling stock we also have our massive programme of reversing those Beeching cuts.

Nearly a third of Britain’s railway was wiped away by Beeching after his 1964 report.

2,300 stations, 5,000 miles of track obliterated.

As you know we’ve already pledged half a billion to begin reversing the cuts - rebuilding old lines, upgrading freight lines, and even creating brand new lines through this process.

Because I believe that by restoring these crucial links, we’ll take an important step in restoring the sense of connection too many communities have lost.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Railwaysceptic

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2017
Messages
1,409
Thank you for providing that link. I'm pleased to see he's emphasising what a lot of railway enthusiasts don't want to hear: that far more journeys are made by bus than by train. I'm also pleased that he realises that improvements to all forms of transport are necessary. One warning bell ringing in my head is about the intention to install "mini Hollands." We've had those imposed on us in London, and they increase road congestion and make travelling by bus far more problematical. I advise people in the North to look that gift horse in the mouth hard and sceptically.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,644
Location
Mold, Clwyd
So having mentioned High Speed North in the introduction and saying he would go into more detail later, he does no such thing.
"Later" must mean much later. ;)
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,932
But nothing in the interim. HS2 is a decade to 15 years away depending upon which stage one refers to. MML, TPE Wiring and other schemes (list as you please) that could release capacity in the meantime
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,644
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Grant Shapps on R5 Live this morning, describing London Overground as the template for future passenger rail contracts (ie the concession model).
Rather spoilt by trying to say that this would bring the services back under public control (makes you wonder who dreamt up the franchise specs and let the contracts?).
He also said the Transpennine £3 billion upgrade would be "on his desk shortly" for approval, and it "would be done".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top