• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

DfT advise TOCs that full timetable is to be restored on 6 July

Status
Not open for further replies.

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
EMR's generous contribution to the 'full timetable' request appears to be a whole of five extra services across their entire network!
Time to turn off the funding tap, the government is simply throwing good money after bad.

To be fair, it seems like EMR have been running a more or less full service of late anyway that I can tell, with the exception of the Corby services.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,015
To be fair, it seems like EMR have been running a more or less full service of late anyway that I can tell, with the exception of the Corby services.
Lots of gaps on the 'provincial' routes. Crewe to Derby 2/3 service, carrying on as such until further notice.
 

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
5,228
To be fair, it seems like EMR have been running a more or less full service of late anyway that I can tell, with the exception of the Corby services.

Doesn't look like Liverpool to Norwich has been hourly, but it's been more than two-hourly. Closer to one train every 90 minutes.
 

Glenn1969

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2019
Messages
1,983
Location
Halifax, Yorks
Northern RTT at Halifax is showing the current timetable until early September and Grand Central website says suspension extended until July 11
 

northernchris

Established Member
Joined
24 Jul 2011
Messages
1,509
Northern RTT at Halifax is showing the current timetable until early September and Grand Central website says suspension extended until July 11

I suppose this makes sense, as by early September if things continue in the same downward trend more staff should be available and it will coincide with schools returning when extra capacity will be required
 

Jamiescott1

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2019
Messages
964
Chiltern are introducing an amended timetable from 6th july, still not a full timetable. From my perspective the new timetable is worse than both the current and normal timetables as less non stoppers to marylebone from my station (high wycombe)
 

DannyMich2018

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2018
Messages
734
I wonder if Birmingham to Leicester will revert to twice hourly with the Birmingham to stansted been reinststed? It's currently hourly Birmingham to Leicester extended to Cambridge every two hours. Loading have increased (well over 20 people on many services) with many services either a 3 car or a pair of two's with virtually no single 2 cars.
 

Bishopstone

Established Member
Joined
24 Jun 2010
Messages
1,471
Location
Seaford
No sign of Gatwick Express returning, though a half-hourly Brighton-Victoria service is maintained by Southern, I believe operated with GatEx stock, calling at Haywards Heath and East Croydon, in addition to the airport.

With much of Gatwick’s flight schedule removed, part of me doubts we’ll see GatEx again before the airport station re-modelling is completed in 2022-ish. The extra calls on the Southern services almost certainly benefit more passengers than are disadvantaged by any nominal increase in journey time.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,784
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
No sign of Gatwick Express returning, though a half-hourly Brighton-Victoria service is maintained by Southern, I believe operated with GatEx stock, calling at Haywards Heath and East Croydon, in addition to the airport.

With much of Gatwick’s flight schedule removed, part of me doubts we’ll see GatEx again before the airport station re-modelling is completed in 2022-ish. The extra calls on the Southern services almost certainly benefit more passengers than are disadvantaged by any nominal increase in journey time.

Also gets rid of (most of) the fares stupidity.
 

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
5,228
I wonder if Birmingham to Leicester will revert to twice hourly with the Birmingham to stansted been reinststed? It's currently hourly Birmingham to Leicester extended to Cambridge every two hours. Loading have increased (well over 20 people on many services) with many services either a 3 car or a pair of two's with virtually no single 2 cars.

Probably because of the same reason XC are currently able to run double Vomiters on the major routes - half of the services not running = many units free. A lot of Midlands services are only 2-car under the normal timetable. Conversely, double Vomiters are rare now that half of them went to West Coast, and rely on more HSTs being out.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,583
To be fair, it seems like EMR have been running a more or less full service of late anyway that I can tell, with the exception of the Corby services.

Derby to Crewe has been the main loser pretty much but the reason there are still gaps is that off peak most services except Liverpool are planned for a 2 car train. This is insufficient capacity for many services so by doing things like stripping out the Mansfield Woodhouse short workings and quieter Newark stopping trains it provides extra units to strengthen the busier services like Nottingham to Worksop and Skegness.

There is no slack in the fleet to allow anything else to be done.
 

BJames

Established Member
Joined
27 Jan 2018
Messages
1,362
Also gets rid of (most of) the fares stupidity.
Exactly. Can we just not have GatEx come back, Southern and Thameslink operate a perfectly good service to the airport.


Elsewhere, hopefully London Overground West Anglia will restoring usual service on the weekend and not just an hourly service from my station.
 

CaptainHaddock

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,213
I live in Beverley, and I agree that we need a much better service than one train every two hours. It’s just not on.

Looks like you're out of luck. The new Northern timetable starting 6 July for your route is now on the link below and unfortunately it looks no different to the current one.


I find it particularly annoying that Northern have not only scrapped the through Scarborough-Sheffield trains but appear to have deliberately timed the connections at Hull to and from Sheffield so you just miss a train and have an hour's wait for the next one!
 
Last edited:

M28361M

Member
Joined
15 May 2014
Messages
537
Location
Liverpool
Merseyrail are increasing their services from 5 July.

Monday-Saturday:
Southport-Hunts Cross reverts to 15 minute frequency all day.
All other lines are 30 minute frequency all day. No reduction in frequency to hourly after 8pm

Sundays:
Southport-Liverpool Central will be every 15 minutes daytime, 30 minutes in the evening.
Other lines remain the same frequency as now (45-minute frequency to West Kirby and New Brighton, hourly elsewhere) but now running later into the evening.

Source: https://www.merseyrail.org/seasonal/covid-19-july-timetable-changes.aspx
 

nedchester

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2008
Messages
2,093

Guidance "If you cannot keep a 2 metre distance, reduce the risk to yourself and others by maintaining a 1 metre distance where possible, and taking suitable precautions. " but still " Consider all other forms of transport before using public transport. "
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
3,641

Guidance "If you cannot keep a 2 metre distance, reduce the risk to yourself and others by maintaining a 1 metre distance where possible, and taking suitable precautions. " but still " Consider all other forms of transport before using public transport. "

Well if we get to the point where trains are still running largely empty and the treasury's patience for paying for them runs out, maybe we'll see a change in message. Aren't we all supposed to go to the pub as soon as we can for the sake of the economy?
 

Southern Dvr

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
876
The government is understandably concerned about images such as those from the tube where everyone was packed in as usual. Hence the do not travel unless essential messaging.

I expect it is quite likely that what will happen next is that they’ll say travel outside the rush hours and reservation essential for long distance with less seats available than pre covid but more than currently available on each train.
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
10,020
Location
here to eternity
Consider all other forms of transport before using public transport.

The Government need to supply the scientific evidence (and when I say evidence I mean real evidence not a theoretical paper produced by some retired professor) that travelling on public transport carries a high risk of catching COVID because I'm getting sick of this constant "do not use public transport" message. :(

The government is understandably concerned about images such as those from the tube where everyone was packed in as usual.

We need evidence that a high proportion of those who have caught COVID in London caught it on the tube. Otherwise its all guesswork.
 
Last edited:

nedchester

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2008
Messages
2,093
The Government need to supply the scientific evidence (and when I say evidence I mean real evidence not a theoretical paper produced by some retired professor) that travelling on public transport carries a high risk of catching COVID because I'm getting sick of this constant "do not use public transport" message. :(

In Germany they are running adverts for the Railways encouraging people to travel by train.......
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,404
Location
Ely
The Government need to supply the scientific evidence (and when I say evidence I mean real evidence not a theoretical paper produced by some retired professor) that travelling on public transport carries a high risk of catching COVID because I'm getting sick of this constant "do not use public transport" message. :(

One thing I've learned over the past few months is how incredibly poor many medical papers are. In particular, many seem to extrapolate conclusions from such tiny sample spaces (one bus, one hospital ward, one hotel, often one patient!) that in pretty much any other scientific field they would have no attention paid to them whatsoever.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
38,932
Location
Yorks
We need evidence that a high proportion of those who have caught COVID in London caught it on the tube. Otherwise its all guesswork.

One thing I've learned over the past few months is how incredibly poor many medical papers are. In particular, many seem to extrapolate conclusions from such tiny sample spaces (one bus, one hospital ward, one hotel, often one patient!) that in pretty much any other scientific field they would have no attention paid to them whatsoever.

Indeed. Given the amount of tracking and tracing going on, there should be enough data to start looking at where cases are related by place and time, which should start to give a clue of where transmission is occurring. This should be able to provide an assessment of how much transfmission is likely to take place in all settings, including public transport.
 

Huntergreed

Established Member
Associate Staff
Events Co-ordinator
Joined
16 Jan 2016
Messages
3,021
Location
Dumfries

Guidance "If you cannot keep a 2 metre distance, reduce the risk to yourself and others by maintaining a 1 metre distance where possible, and taking suitable precautions. " but still " Consider all other forms of transport before using public transport. "
This is, aside from the 1 metre, identical to the current guidance. I believe that this will, sadly, mean we haven't quite seen the end of 'essential only' pumping out from certain operators in a bid to make things easier for themselves. I think at this stage it's extremely disappointing that this guidance is still being maintained. I haven't seen one shred of solid evidence that suggests public transport acts as a 'super spreader' of the disease, and in fact restrictions are tighter there than anywhere else (masks and distancing), and yet we're STILL being told not to use it.

Aren't we all supposed to go to the pub as soon as we can for the sake of the economy?
We are, but I think many people will be too scared to go out, and those who do aren't likely to enjoy it as much due to the 'measures' in place.

I know many people in my university course who are in the lowest risk group who are terrified of going to the pub, terrified of going anywhere near public transport to go to the pub, and terrified to even go shopping because of the way the virus has been portrayed in government and media messaging. I really don't think our government considered the long term economic difficulties associated with such fear driven messaging and the level of dread-mongering that they went for and I do think this may make the economy much, much more difficult to get up to previous levels, if we even can anymore.

In Germany they are running adverts for the Railways encouraging people to travel by train.......
We really need to be doing this as well. Sadly the mandation of masks, the heavy '**** off' messaging coming from some TOC's and the way it has been portrayed as a 'danger' will, I think, have killed of a significant % of revenue for the railways, perhaps permanently, and if not then for a very long time indeed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top