I voted for Other (Please Specify)
What I would do is a targeted local lockdown, with measures tailored to the specific cause of the outbreak in a particularr area.
What is appopriate for one area may not be appropriate for another area.
I have already mentioned the case of the Borough of Sandwell in the West Midlands, where I live. There, one of the main source of infections was large multi generational households, some of which contained people whose first language was not English, and who therefore did not understand all the rules about testing and self isolation, etc. The council asked people who could speak the appropriate languages to go out into the community and explain the situation. Since that was done, the infection rate in Sandwell has dropped by about 50%, and the number of wards in the borough with no cases at all has increased to 75%. So it was not necessary to close pubs, shops and leisure centres in Sandwell, and I question whether that would have made any difference anyway.
All local authorities should balance the need to keep the virus under control with the need to keep as much of the economy open as possible. Remember that government policy is not to avoid a "second peak" (whatever that means,) but to avoid a second peak which overwhelms the NHS. According to the latest figures, admissions to hospital for COVID-19, the number of patients in hospital with COVID-19, and the number of patients with COVID-19 on mechanical ventilators are the lowest they have ever been since the start of the pandemic.