• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

dmu class 140

Status
Not open for further replies.

snakeeyes

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2011
Messages
213
Hi, The Keith and Dufftown railway has a class 140, went past the other day, its not moved for 20 years, is there any plans to get this working?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,251
Location
Fenny Stratford
Well it says on their website it is awaitng restoration - so perhaps! It is unique and irc it was built to much higher standards than the 142/3/4 units
 

sprinterguy

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,056
Location
Macclesfield
It is unique and irc it was built to much higher standards than the 142/3/4 units
It's appearance doesn't give me much confidence in that statement: It looks to me like it would be even worse than a 141!

It's a terrible shame to see this valuable unit, seminal in the development of second generation MUs, collecting mildew and decaying like it currently is.
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
How did this survive and not end up in the national collection?! It is surely the pioneer, or one of them, of BR's second generation DMUs, I'd have thought it would warrant a space at York, particularly considering it'll be a fair old while before anything still in service becomes available.
 

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
Another prototype Railbus, subsequently sold to NIR, is preserved at Downpatrick, in much better nick than the 140. Nice that this has been saved, while NIR's own 'seminal train', that is a representative of one of the DEMUs that were mainstay for 30+ years, looks likely to succumb one and all to the cutter's torch.
 

driver9000

Established Member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
4,241
It's appearance doesn't give me much confidence in that statement: It looks to me like it would be even worse than a 141!

From the writings of the time the font end was built to a higher standard than the later types. From what I remember the 140 was built to the specification of the time and by the time the 141 etc was ordered the specification had been withdrawn and replaced with a different one.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,695
It looks like a gangwayed Pacer.... pity the gangway didnt survive into production models
 

driver9000

Established Member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
4,241
141 (and 142) front ends are clearly strengthened Leyland National front ends.

Not quite. The 141/142 have a specially designed front end, compare it with the standard National front used on the LEVs. The standard National front couldn't be used on the 142 as it is wider than the bus and the 141. The standard National front end didn't meet all of the needs of the safety requirements which was main reason behind the new front being devised.
 
Last edited:

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
The cab looks more PEP influenced than like a class 150 or any mk III unit, which fits given when it was produced.
 

sprinterguy

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,056
Location
Macclesfield
It's worth noting the image (or atleast appears to be) an HDR image or tone mapped/processed, which exagerates things like dirt/wrinkles/cracks.
I was referring to the appearance (design would have been a better word to use) of the class 140 in general, rather than just its' current decrepit condition.
 

driver9000

Established Member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
4,241
:D
And in the case of the 141s, still with indicators :lol:

Rather handy that the Leyland light cluster could be adapted for a tail lamp to be built into the cluster where the indicator would normally be :)

The 141 also sported the standard Leyland bus desk and the DSD was a bus brake pedal!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top