• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Southern Only tickets and validity on Gatwick Express

Status
Not open for further replies.

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,745
Location
Yorkshire
2) I suspect a Daysave would work the barriers at Victoria too.
The P13/14 barriers were left open last time I was there.
3) If tickets are not now sold on the Gatex services are they checked?
They check tickets near the new barriers at Victoria, anyone who looks like a tourist is checked more thoroughly, and the regular commuters just rush past and they can't be inspected in any great detail. There's at least one diagram that involves a Brighton Express arriving into Victoria and then forming a Gatwick Express out of Victoria. Of course it doesn't change company at Victoria. All the Gatwick Express trains to Brighton in the evening come back as either ECS or as Brighton Express. Again, they don't change company (except in the imagination of Chris Burchell and chums).
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ushawk

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2010
Messages
1,965
Location
Eastbourne
171's WILL be operating their normal paths between Brighton and Hastings during the Ore Tunnel closure as there are no other electrics available to run them instead, during the weekdays anyway, generally when the Ashford line gets closed at weekends due to work, the 171's are usually replaced by 377s, no idea if thats happening.
 

The Colonel

Member
Joined
1 Feb 2011
Messages
261
171's WILL be operating their normal paths between Brighton and Hastings during the Ore Tunnel closure as there are no other electrics available to run them instead, during the weekdays anyway, generally when the Ashford line gets closed at weekends due to work, the 171's are usually replaced by 377s, no idea if thats happening.

Thanks for the info - clarifies one thing then.
 

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,151
Has anyone else tried to buy Downlander recently? I have been unable to buy them for the last few days as the link on Southern website seems to have broke.
 

wintonian

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2010
Messages
4,889
Location
Hampshire
Has anyone else tried to buy Downlander recently? I have been unable to buy them for the last few days as the link on Southern website seems to have broke.

It looks to me more like they are deliberately not selling them ATM for some reason.

stating the obvious but maybe email them and ask them whats up?
 

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,151
Well it has been a bank holiday weekend. ;)

Yes but you would think certain departments would be manned as usual given that the trains still ran.

I'm sure 31st was manned.
 

wintonian

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2010
Messages
4,889
Location
Hampshire
Yes but you would think certain departments would be manned as usual given that the trains still ran.

I'm sure 31st was manned.

When I emailed SouthEastern last year it was about a week before I got the briefest of replies that only half answered the question.

I wouldn't wait up if I were you.
 

Urban Gateline

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2011
Messages
1,645
Yes but you would think certain departments would be manned as usual given that the trains still ran.

I'm sure 31st was manned.

However you have to remember that these are office workers, who mostly work standard Mon-Fri, they most likely never work weekends or bank holidays anyway!
 

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,151
Well I'm not holding my breath anyway. I needed it for Thursday 5th so am now looking at alternative options.
 

wintonian

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2010
Messages
4,889
Location
Hampshire
A week? wow thats quick for SouthEastern....

It was a simple query and in any case there reply was wrong - they told me a Calais ticket couldn't be used on HS1.

Unfortunately that was a somewhat predictable response that made me query how much of the worlds resources I had waisted in sending the email in the first place. :-x
 

tsr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
7,400
Location
Between the parallel lines
Just to confirm that announcements on "GatEx" 442s are more annoying and confusing than ever since they still like to tell you, in the most lengthy way possible, that you don't need to buy a ticket before boarding, and that you can buy one onboard. Predictably, the platform announcements state completely the opposite. 442s (the only "GatEx" stock I've been on recently) have a mixture of "Gatwick Express" and "Express" branding, because the announcements and screens show "Gatwick Express", as opposed to the stickers and posters, most of which show "Express", including some Penalty Fares notices which say you can still buy a ticket once en-route, or something similar.
 

blakey1152

Member
Joined
5 Sep 2011
Messages
450
Thought I'd have a quick peek at the Southern web site...and sure enough

Sorry, there are no tickets/dates available for the selected promotion.

Is all you get when you click to buy a downlander ticket!
Glad I got mine for 23rd December without any issues now.
 

ushawk

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2010
Messages
1,965
Location
Eastbourne
Might of been worth phoning them, dont know if they're customer service was open during last week, but i guess its an immediate reply.
 

bendolino

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2012
Messages
5
Location
West Sussex
All,

Gatwick Express is still a separate franchise entity, it was merely combined with the 2007 tender. Southern only tickets are not available to use whatsoever on any GX service, and anyone who decides to push the envelope on this is very much wrong to do so. The only exception is on the GX extensions to and from Brighton. On these, any SDR or CDR (PM) or indeed advance ticket with a GX extension train specified is valid, provided they are not endorsed specifically to a single TOC. Daysave tickets can be used on GX extensions south of Gatwick.
Any journey on ANY GX between Gatwick and Victoria and vice versa is therefore specifically limited to the GX ticketing arrangements.
For those who wish to argue the point that they are 'Sector HW' trains, yes this is indeed now correct HOWEVER they remain a separate service group, commercially and for performance measurement. It is indeed part of the South Central franchise specification to retain and operate the airport service as it's own brand and trading entity. ATOC also show this, and indeed show GX as it's own function in all public facing documents.
For those who would like a couple of precedents, here are a couple. The Caledonian sleeper is run by ScotRail but remains outside of all other franchise commitments as a singular commercial entity. This we all know. Also, the Heathrow Connect joint venture with FGW and HX is marketed as it's own commercial entity with split fare rules. I hope this clarifies matters.
 

wintonian

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2010
Messages
4,889
Location
Hampshire
All,

Gatwick Express is still a separate franchise entity, it was merely combined with the 2007 tender. Southern only tickets are not available to use whatsoever on any GX service, and anyone who decides to push the envelope on this is very much wrong to do so.

You seem to contradict yourself here, how can it be both a separate franchise and part of another one at the same time?

The DfT have confirmed that Gatwick Express is not a TOC so why would we be wrong to push this?

The only exception is on the GX extensions to and from Brighton. On these, any SDR or CDR (PM) or indeed advance ticket with a GX extension train specified is valid, provided they are not endorsed specifically to a single TOC. Daysave tickets can be used on GX extensions south of Gatwick.

Advance tickets by there nature are restricted to a single TOC unless the & connections part has been issued without reservations and then only this part would be not be tied to a specific TOC. If the & connections part specifies a Gatwick Express service then is this then not tied to a particular TOC?

Southern only tickets a valid at all times as Gatwick Express is the same TOC as that the tickets are restricted to.

As you say IMO daysave is no longer valid on Gatwick Express as the terms now read "Not valid on Gatwick Express"

Any journey on ANY GX between Gatwick and Victoria and vice versa is therefore specifically limited to the GX ticketing arrangements.

It is part of the Southern TOC so these must be valid by definition.

'Sector HW' For those who wish to argue the point that they are 'Sector HW' trains, yes this is indeed now correct HOWEVER they remain a separate service group,

I'm not familiar with the term 'Sector HW' so am left confused here.


commercially and for performance measurement. It is indeed part of the South Central franchise specification to retain and operate the airport service as it's own brand and trading entity.

Correct it is a brand of southern like the Stansted Express and not a separate TOC.

ATOC also show this, and indeed show GX as it's own function in all public facing documents.

That is up to them but does not change the relationship with the NCCoC.

For those who would like a couple of precedents, here are a couple. The Caledonian sleeper is run by ScotRail but remains outside of all other franchise commitments as a singular commercial entity. This we all know. Also, the Heathrow Connect joint venture with FGW and HX is marketed as it's own commercial entity with split fare rules. I hope this clarifies matters.

So I assume the Night Rivera operates outside of FGW's franchise commitments?

The Caledonian sleepers are run by Scotrail and as far as I know there is no such thing as a Scotrail only ticket (exept advance tickets) and in any case any such ticket would be valid if the sleeper formed part of a permited route.

Heathrow connect is a private railway beyond Hayes and Harlington and ceases to be a TOC from their and as such is not subject to the NCCoC between Heathrow and Hayes and Harlington.

I'm sure others will correct me if I have misinterpreted any of this.

BTW welcome top the forum. :)
 

transportphoto

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Messages
4,580
Good Morning Ben, Welcome to the forum - unfortunately I feel I have to challenge your post.

Gatwick Express is still a separate franchise entity, it was merely combined with the 2007 tender.
Can you provide a source to this? Can you provide the franchise information for GatEx? If they are a separate franchise, they would be a separate company, can you provide a company number for this company?
Southern only tickets are not available to use whatsoever on any GX service, and anyone who decides to push the envelope on this is very much wrong to do so.
Do you work for Southern by any chance? We have every right to push the envelope. We even have recordings of phone calls made to the Southern/Gatwick Express customer service line where they admit that SN only tickets are valid on GX.
The only exception is on the GX extensions to and from Brighton. On these, any SDR or CDR (PM) or indeed advance ticket with a GX extension train specified is valid, provided they are not endorsed specifically to a single TOC. Daysave tickets can be used on GX extensions south of Gatwick.
This is correct, as they are southern services. You forget that they are also valid between Gatwick and Victoria.
Any journey on ANY GX between Gatwick and Victoria and vice versa is therefore specifically limited to the GX ticketing arrangements.
What are the GX ticketing arrangements? This is new? Could you expand?
For those who wish to argue the point that they are 'Sector HW' trains, yes this is indeed now correct HOWEVER they remain a separate service group, commercially and for performance measurement. It is indeed part of the South Central franchise specification to retain and operate the airport service as it's own brand and trading entity. ATOC also show this, and indeed show GX as it's own function in all public facing documents.
What is a 'HW Sector train'?
For those who would like a couple of precedents, here are a couple. The Caledonian sleeper is run by ScotRail but remains outside of all other franchise commitments as a singular commercial entity.
That would be why ScotRail only tickets (should they exist) are valid on the Cally Sleeper.
This we all know. Also, the Heathrow Connect joint venture with FGW and HX is marketed as it's own commercial entity with split fare rules. I hope this clarifies matters.
Thats why they accept travelcards, oyster cards and (should they exist) FGW only tickets between Paddington and Hayes and Harlington. Journeys between the Heathrow Junction off of the GWML are no longer subject to the NRCoC as this is a private railway.

As you can tell, I wish for a reply!

TP
 
Last edited:

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,745
Location
Yorkshire
All,

Gatwick Express is still a separate franchise entity
It's one franchise, but the NRCoC refers to a Train Company. Gatwick Express is not a Company. The DfT has confirmed this. I realise this disappoints you, but you have to accept that.
it was merely combined with the 2007 tender.
Irrelevant
Southern only tickets are not available to use whatsoever on any GX service
Any what service? Southern only tickets are valid on all trains operated by Southern. If Southern do not operate these services, then they are operating without a passenger license, because since 2008 there has been no company called GX with a license to operate trains and no company called Gatwick Express is currently trading. It would be illegal for any company to purport this!
and anyone who decides to push the envelope on this is very much wrong to do so.
Oh, really? I think not....
The only exception is on the GX extensions to and from Brighton.
Perhaps you can provide a source for this 'exception'?
On these, any SDR or CDR (PM) or indeed advance ticket with a GX extension train specified is valid, provided they are not endorsed specifically to a single TOC. Daysave tickets can be used on GX extensions south of Gatwick.
So you are admitting that these trains are operated by Southern! This admission always comes out eventually ;)
Any journey on ANY GX between Gatwick and Victoria and vice versa is therefore specifically limited to the GX ticketing arrangements.
The what ticketing arrangements? Can I see what you are referring to?

I was under the impression these were normal trains bound by the NRCoC, if you have any evidence to the contrary please present it for us to investigate....
For those who wish to argue the point that they are 'Sector HW' trains, yes this is indeed now correct HOWEVER they remain a separate service group, commercially and for performance measurement
Irrelevant to the customer when it comes to ticketing. NRCoC makes no mention of 'service groups' for validity ;)
It is indeed part of the South Central franchise specification to retain and operate the airport service as it's own brand and trading entity.
Use what terminology you want but it ACTUALLY says:-

"The Franchisee shall as a minimum:
(a)
retain the use of the name "Gatwick Express"..."

This is no different to Stansted Express. We have no issue with this name being used. The name Brighton Express also appears in timetables denoted by an E symbol, but is not very well publicised. Such names are irrelevant. What matters is the Company, as defined by NRCoC.
ATOC also show this, and indeed show GX as it's own function in all public facing documents.
ATOC do not regulate the industry. The DfT do. I know that John Horncastle rigorously defends what you're doing, but he would do wouldn't he? ATOC does not in any way represent the DfT or passengers.
For those who would like a couple of precedents, here are a couple. The Caledonian sleeper is run by ScotRail but remains outside of all other franchise commitments as a singular commercial entity. This we all know.
Irrelevant because a Scotrail Only ticket would be valid on it, and we are discussing validity of tickets here. The passenger is not in any way interested in internal railway matters about where funding comes from.
Also, the Heathrow Connect joint venture with FGW and HX is marketed as it's own commercial entity with split fare rules. I hope this clarifies matters.
"Split fare rules" :lol:? You mean this runs on a private line that isn't owned by Network Rail. What has that got to do with Gatwick Express?

The correct comparison is Stansted Express.

A Cambridge-Brighton Route NXEA & Southern only ticket is valid on both Stansted Express and Gatwick Express as both are route brands for their respective Companies.

Gatwick Express and Stansted Express are not TOCs.
 

DaveNewcastle

Established Member
Joined
21 Dec 2007
Messages
7,387
Location
Newcastle (unless I'm out)
All,

Gatwick Express is still a separate franchise entity, . . .
Ben,

Thanks for coming on here to give us your opinion on the status of Gatwick Express - your confident writing style does you great credit.

However, some of us would appreciate any evidential basis for your claims, as those have eluded us to the point that we frankly fail to see any substance to them. Perhaps you can help?
Could you direct us to the Ticketing and Settlement contract between RSP & GatEx?
Can you state when the most recent returns of LENON data from GatEx were made?
Can you supply a recent set of Annual Accounts for GatEx?
Can you advise the number of staff employed and sub-contracted by GatEx*?
Could you provide the leasing terms for the rolling stock operated by GatEx*?
Can you name the Directors of Gatwick Express and the date of their last business meeting?
What is a 'trading entity' other than a Company, Partnership, a marketing 'brand' or internal 'department'?
[*A yes or no answer would be a reasonable response to these commercially sensitive requests]

I hope you can see why we suspect that Southern Railways is purporting to trade as a seperate identity without any legal foundation to do so, and, how, through a chain of deduction, we reach the conclusion that 'Southern-only' tickets will be valid on services branded as GatEx or 'Express'; a conclusion increasingly supported by staff on the ground.

I look forward to your replies
 

bendolino

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2012
Messages
5
Location
West Sussex
All - I'll try to answer each point in turn.
Wintonian, Sorry much as I'd like to be I'm not contradicting myself because that's how the DFT have tendered it. To retain "Airport Express" status (remember them?) but move more than just fresh air in the AM and PM peak. That is the situation we have now. Gatwick Express is still a separate entity in ATOC land, and thus, in fares manual land. This is a commercial concern, and one that the BAA (when Gatwick was so-owned) attempted to challenge by threatened court action to stop GX disappearing completely from the map.

By the advance quote I mean no common TOC that runs on a parallel route with GX services. So yes, from Hassocks to Birmingham New Street via "London" valid on "Virgin Trains & Connections" would be accepted on a GX extension service in the AM peak.

No it's not. You make a very good moral argument, I don't deny that at all. But I'm afraid you have to face the facts here, Gatwick Express still exists as a ticketing regime and that is accepted by all comers. It quite specifically singles out the Gatwick Express trains, extricating them from other "Southern" services.

Sector HW is the Schedule 8 title for Southern Railway. Apologies for not being clear here.

Quite right. See Appendix C of the NRCoC and you will see two entries, one for Southern, and one for Southern trading as Gatwick Express. So this is covered by the NRCoC.

No, the Night Riviera is IN the FGW Franchise Commitment. Look I know this is perverse to all enthusiasts, but I too am an enthusiast, but the difference is I work in the industry. I don't want the likes of you guys hauled in front of the beak for flouting rules you thought worthy of challenge. That's my interest here.


The line between Airport Junction and Heathrow is owned by the British Airports Authority. However Heathrow Express must also comply with National Rail standards in order to have their products sold.


Transportphoto, the 2007 tender document (on the Govia website open to all to see) specifies that the GX & SC franchises were both combined as a going concern to be jointly bid for to be run by one company. This is because the extensions to Brighton would be intrinsically linked between the new company and what was GX.

No but I used to work for Southern. I now work for an industry partner in the same area. I am not admitting who in open forum for my own protection. SN Cust Svcs are entitled to give you any info they like, however the rules are clear - and haven't change since GX merged into the SC franchise. GX trains to and from Victoria / Gatwick Airport for journeys commencing or finishing solely between those points are subject to a separate ticketing agreement for cheaper rate tickets, only GX tickets or "Any Permitted" tickets are valid. Network Cards still are not allowed on GX.

DaySave and Downlanders are not valid on GX services between Gatwick and Victoria. Period. No exceptions. This is in the T&Cs.

GX ticketing arrangements are not new. They've been in place since the Gatwick Express venture was separated from Network South East. They still exist today, albeit with easements for the extension services to and from Brighton.

Asked answered and apologised for.

No, the Caledonian Sleeper is subject to a wholly different fares structure (for those travelling from south of the border), and is even defined as a peak service between certain stations in Scotland, when it never used to be - that is new.

Private railway it may be, but it's still a National Rail product, available for sale from National Rail outlets, and therefore has a split fares structure.


Yorkie,
It doesn't matter if it's a company or not. It's a registered and recognised trading name for Southern. As shown in the NRCoC.

I will respond when you tell me why it is irrelevant as I find your one word response a little argumentative.

I believe your argument is undone by Appendix 3, page 27 of the current NRCoC.

You may think not. You may believe not. But you are mistaken. Do I think it's morally right? That's another question.

Not online no, but I saw the conductor's brief for the GX workings for extensions to Brighton. Normal tickets are able to be used providing your journey commences or terminates at a station SOUTH of Gatwick Airport, wherever you are travelling from, as GX Extensions have replaced formerly Southern Victoria services in previous timetables.

Yes, the trains are "operated" by Southern. This is never a point that is in dispute.

See Appendix 3, Page 27 of the NRCoC which defines Gatwick Express as a separate entity.

No but the NRCoC does show Gatwick Express!

...Good glad we agree. As you can see Southern are in twice, trading as two different trading names.

No but ATOC administer the fares and agree revenue splitting from regulated fares between common TOCs on a line of route, and this forms the crux of the argument at hand.

Correct. StanX and GatX are not TOCs. But they are separate trading names, in both cases. What NXEA choose to do with that is their concern, but Southern have chosen to retain the previous Gatwick Express fares regimen. Again, morally questionable, but factually correct and able to be seen at any ticket office window and Quick Fare machine on the Brighton Main Line, where "NOT GX" tickets are split from all London destinations.

Part 2 follows.
 

transportphoto

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Messages
4,580
Part 2 follows.

I look forward too it, I apologise about posting the info about yourself earlier. I'm glad were on the same page though, Gatwick Express is Southern, by your own admission. Southern Only limits to trains operated by Southern Railway Limited. Gatwick Express is a trading name Southern Railway Limited which equals valid, doesn't it?

TP
 

Urban Gateline

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2011
Messages
1,645
I find the whole argument about Southern-only tickets leads to a moot point.

If so much arguing between both sides occurs, Southern will inevitably change the T&C's of their "Southern Only" tickets and make it clearer that they are not valid on GEX services or new restrictions might be added. Then people might regret so much open debate about this issue!
 

wintonian

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2010
Messages
4,889
Location
Hampshire
I'm on the mobile at the moment so will give a fuller reply later.

But thank you for engaging in this debate you seem to Bring reason and intelligence to your arguments which are adrimable qulities, however I do disagree.

P.s. phone doesn't understand my spelling.

Sent from my HTC Desire S
 

bendolino

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2012
Messages
5
Location
West Sussex
Ben,

Thanks for coming on here to give us your opinion on the status of Gatwick Express - your confident writing style does you great credit.

However, some of us would appreciate any evidential basis for your claims, as those have eluded us to the point that we frankly fail to see any substance to them. Perhaps you can help?
Could you direct us to the Ticketing and Settlement contract between RSP & GatEx?
Can you state when the most recent returns of LENON data from GatEx were made?
Can you supply a recent set of Annual Accounts for GatEx?
Can you advise the number of staff employed and sub-contracted by GatEx*?
Could you provide the leasing terms for the rolling stock operated by GatEx*?
Can you name the Directors of Gatwick Express and the date of their last business meeting?
What is a 'trading entity' other than a Company, Partnership, a marketing 'brand' or internal 'department'?
[*A yes or no answer would be a reasonable response to these commercially sensitive requests]

I hope you can see why we suspect that Southern Railways is purporting to trade as a seperate identity without any legal foundation to do so, and, how, through a chain of deduction, we reach the conclusion that 'Southern-only' tickets will be valid on services branded as GatEx or 'Express'; a conclusion increasingly supported by staff on the ground.

I look forward to your replies

Part 2.
You know the answers to these from the answer I gave in part 1. Virtually all the items don't exist and are based in the management and revenue structure of Southern Railway. HOWEVER... whether you find it risible or not that a company can get away with it, the facts remain, this was endorsed AND encouraged (see South Central conditions of franchise) by the DFT and continues to be practice to this day. You know as well as I do that the Gatwick Express is a bargaining chip in political circles and there was plans to do away with it entirely. However, it was not, and what we have is the mess we have today whereby you can step up to a Quick Fare machine at Gatwick, find a ticket to "London" and be presented with as many as four different options - or indeed more when taking SDR/CDR differences into account

I am not defending the conduct of the company, however you should know that the Gatwick Express has been vehemently defended by its employees and the airport community, which is why the structure still exists to this day.

As a footnote to enthusiasts I can provide you with diagrammed workings of Class 442s which do not infringe on the GX only (or ineligible portions of DaySave) tickets.

Again, I cannot comment on whether it is morally right or wrong, but just to present the facts. Staff backing your stance may well be through an unwillingness to argue.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I look forward too it, I apologise about posting the info about yourself earlier. I'm glad were on the same page though, Gatwick Express is Southern, by your own admission. Southern Only limits to trains operated by Southern Railway Limited. Gatwick Express is a trading name Southern Railway Limited which equals valid, doesn't it?

TP

No, you are not correct.
See Appendix 3 of NRCoC Oct 2011, list of Train Operating Companies
"Southern Railway Limited (trading as Southern)
Southern Railway Limited (trading as Gatwick Express)"

The two are extracted from one another. You are trying to split a hair that has already been split for you.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I find the whole argument about Southern-only tickets leads to a moot point.

If so much arguing between both sides occurs, Southern will inevitably change the T&C's of their "Southern Only" tickets and make it clearer that they are not valid on GEX services or new restrictions might be added. Then people might regret so much open debate about this issue!

I quite agree, by complaining so openly and loudly, you make "turning a blind eye" a less and less likely option in the future!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I'm on the mobile at the moment so will give a fuller reply later.

But thank you for engaging in this debate you seem to Bring reason and intelligence to your arguments which are adrimable qulities, however I do disagree.

P.s. phone doesn't understand my spelling.

Sent from my HTC Desire S

You're entitled to, as the point here is a moral one, in response to a situation which is clearly laid down in the fares manual. Do I agree with the moral argument that Southern is Southern is Southern? I will have to get back to you on that one... !
 

transportphoto

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Messages
4,580
You're entitled to, as the point here is a moral one, in response to a situation which is clearly laid down in the fares manual.
Irrelevant.

How do we, as customers, have access to the fares manual? It does not form part of the contract between the customer and the relevant TOCs as only one party has access to it :smile:

TP
 

johnnycache

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2012
Messages
421
My first post. Surely it is legitimate for any operator to create a ticket like Daysave and to specify on which services they intend it to be valid. For example if instead of saying "not valid on Gatwick Express" it had said "not valid on non-stop trains between Victoria and Gatwick Airport" that would be perfectly reasonable. In this case "Gatwick Express" is a convenient way of identifying those trains for which this ticket is not valid.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,745
Location
Yorkshire
All - I'll try to answer each point in turn.
Wintonian, Sorry much as I'd like to be I'm not contradicting myself because that's how the DFT have tendered it. To retain "Airport Express" status (remember them?) but move more than just fresh air in the AM and PM peak. That is the situation we have now.
I've spoken to the DfT (several of us have) and I have read the Southern Franchise Agreement. It's pretty clear that the name 'Gatwick Express' must be used, but this is no different to the name Stansted Express being used. No-one claims that NXEA tickets are not valid on Stansted Express though!
Gatwick Express is still a separate entity in ATOC land, and thus, in fares manual land.
I admit that there are some factions within ATOC that do not get this right, but this page http://www.atoc.org/train-companies correctly does not list either Stansted Express or Gatwick Express as TOCs. However it is, ultimately, the DfT not ATOC who decide these things. If you are familiar with ATOC then you will know that not everyone at ATOC will agree with either of us - so it's probably just as well ATOC are not the Regulator!
This is a commercial concern, and one that the BAA (when Gatwick was so-owned) attempted to challenge by threatened court action to stop GX disappearing completely from the map.
I am aware there is an Agreement that the Gatwick Express name must be retained. I have no problem with that, nor the name Stansted Express over at NXEA. As for the map, Southern's map is perfectly adequate as it clearly shows the true situation, and I don't think anyone is complaining about the map. In fact the map supports our argument and I suggest all passengers carry a copy with them (best printed in colour).
By the advance quote I mean no common TOC that runs on a parallel route with GX services. So yes, from Hassocks to Birmingham New Street via "London" valid on "Virgin Trains & Connections" would be accepted on a GX extension service in the AM peak.
Of course a 'TOC & Connections' ticket is valid on these trains, but the problem is that Southern deny that they operate these trains and therefore some staff put up an argument (that can usually be dealt with) that as these trains are, they allege, not operated by Southern, then Southern Only tickets are not valid on them. However when presented with a good case, nearly all customers are "let off".
No it's not. You make a very good moral argument, I don't deny that at all.
Thank you, I appreciate that.
But I'm afraid you have to face the facts here, Gatwick Express still exists as a ticketing regime
I am happy to face "facts" but this statement is not a "fact" and I do not recognise the term "ticketing regime". Sorry.
and that is accepted by all comers.
What exactly is accepted by who?
It quite specifically singles out the Gatwick Express trains, extricating them from other "Southern" services.
What does?
Sector HW is the Schedule 8 title for Southern Railway. Apologies for not being clear here.
I do not recognise the term 'sector' applying to the NRCoC, nor can I find it in the Franchise Agreement. I don't know, but perhaps you are referring to 'Service Group'? There are 3 Service Groups, one of which is for the Gatwick to London non-stop trains but I can't see any reason why any service group would be considered a separate Company to the other service groups.
Quite right. See Appendix C of the NRCoC and you will see two entries, one for Southern, and one for Southern trading as Gatwick Express. So this is covered by the NRCoC.
We are well aware of the change made to the NRCoC a few months ago, and the reasons Southern did so, but this was not a "material change" and was merely to show that these brands are both the same TOC.

But we asked the DfT for clarification, one of the questions was:
"Can you confirm whether Gatwick Express and Stansted Express are separate companies, as defined in Appendix A of the NRCoC?"
The answer was:
I confirm that neither Stansted Express nor Gatwick Express are a Train Operating Company: Stansted Express is a trading name of the London Eastern Railway Limited Train Operating Company. Gatwick Express is a trading name of the Southern Railway Limited Operating Company.
If you dispute this, I suggest you contact Peter Lepper at the DfT. However I would strongly advise against disputing it and accepting the decision.


No, the Night Riviera is IN the FGW Franchise Commitment. Look I know this is perverse to all enthusiasts, but I too am an enthusiast, but the difference is I work in the industry. I don't want the likes of you guys hauled in front of the beak for flouting rules you thought worthy of challenge. That's my interest here.
Believe me, it is Southern who are heading for trouble here.

A while back WSMR were adamant they did not have to accept Route Birmingham tickets. We informed their MD of the reasons why they had to be valid and indeed encouraged him to dispute the revenue allocation process as WSMR was apparently being denied revenue they were entitled to through ORCATS. In the end, WSMR had to relent to our collective knowledge and they eventually accepted Route Birmingham tickets.

If Southern continue, they risk negative media publicity and investigations. We are not going to let this one go. I urge Southern to do the right thing and consistently admit that the Gatwick Express is operated by Southern, instead of admitting it when it suits and denying it when it doesn't.
Transportphoto, the 2007 tender document (on the Govia website open to all to see) specifies that the GX & SC franchises were both combined as a going concern to be jointly bid for to be run by one company. This is because the extensions to Brighton would be intrinsically linked between the new company and what was GX.
"one company" - this has now happened, I am glad you admit that it is one company, because when customers are challenged by staff they are told it is a "separate company"; purporting to be a company that ceased trading over 3 years ago is illegal and the practice must cease immediately, perhaps you can ensure your colleagues who claim that they are not "one company" do not make claims to the contrary?
No but I used to work for Southern. I now work for an industry partner in the same area. I am not admitting who in open forum for my own protection.
OK, fair enough.
SN Cust Svcs are entitled to give you any info they like
They sure do give out whatever info they like, including contradictory claims. This is bad practice and could lead to problems for Southern.
however the rules are clear
Agreed. NRCoC is very clear, and tickets routed "southern Only" are restricting the customer to those services provided by that "Train Company"; DfT is clear that there is only one company involved here and that is Southern. Gatwick Express ceased to be a Train Company in 2008 and not only have DfT confirmed this but Companies House have confirmed it too.
- and haven't change since GX merged into the SC franchise.
Incorrect, sorry but this is your opinion and the DfT disagrees with you. It is one franchise, one company.
GX trains to and from Victoria / Gatwick Airport for journeys commencing or finishing solely between those points are subject to a separate ticketing agreement for cheaper rate tickets
Really? Where is this "ticketing agreement"? I think you will find that this is not the case and the NRCoC applies. In fact the majority of their staff do admit the NRCoC applies (some deny it saying "we are special/express"!) but they also admit that they are not familiar with Condition 10. When a forum member asked if anyone was familiar with Condition 10 the duty manager said "No, but we don't need to be!" I think that says it all.
only GX tickets or "Any Permitted" tickets are valid.
I can't accept that at all. Tickets are valid in accordance with the NRCoC.
Network Cards still are not allowed on GX.
Except for journeys continuing beyond Gatwick on such services that are extended to Brighton (and vice versa), however it is dubious how enforceable that is, but let's not go there...
DaySave and Downlanders are not valid on GX services between Gatwick and Victoria. Period. No exceptions. This is in the T&Cs.
The Downlander is dubious, again let's not go there. The Daysave I cannot accept because of NRCoC Condition 10. I note that you appear to imply that Daysaves & Downlanders are valid between Gatwick & Brighton on services branded Gatwick Express. Can you confirm this, and also the reasoning behind this (ie, do you consider that the TOC changes at Gatwick Airport)? I appreciate these posts are getting very long but if you answer just one question please answer this one as I am most intrigued!
GX ticketing arrangements are not new. They've been in place since the Gatwick Express venture was separated from Network South East. They still exist today, albeit with easements for the extension services to and from Brighton.
Again I can only ask to see these 'arrangements' as you put it, or "special rules" as some staff have told us. Bizarrely no-one has ever seen them and all the information available to the public suggests the NRCoC applies.

Not online no, but I saw the conductor's brief for the GX workings for extensions to Brighton. Normal tickets are able to be used providing your journey commences or terminates at a station SOUTH of Gatwick Airport, wherever you are travelling from, as GX Extensions have replaced formerly Southern Victoria services in previous timetables.
This information is not in the public domain so cannot possibly form any part in the Contract. It is, therefore irrelevant to passengers. Nevertheless I am intrigued and therefore would appreciate it if anyone can get further information in this area.
Yes, the trains are "operated" by Southern. This is never a point that is in dispute.
It may not be disputed by you but it is a central point of the argument used by staff who stand by the barriers (though when the barriers are turned on the issue goes away - you can figure out why!)
See Appendix 3, Page 27 of the NRCoC which defines Gatwick Express as a separate entity.
It does no such thing IMO. Please define "entity". If by "entity" you mean a Train Operating Company, then no it does not and the DfT confirmed this.
No but the NRCoC does show Gatwick Express!
The NRCoC makes it reasonably (though not crystal) clear that the services branded Gatwick Express are operated by the Southern Railways Train Operating Company. However I can see that some people may doubt this, that is why we asked the DfT for clarification, which they did.
...Good glad we agree. As you can see Southern are in twice, trading as two different trading names.
But it's one TOC, and that is what matters.

Does NRCoC Condition 10 state that tickets can be restricted to trading names? No, it says Companies.

Do you admit or deny that a NXEA Only ticket is valid on Stansted Express?

Do you admit or deny that Stansted Express' listing in NRCoC is no different to that of Gatwick Express?
No but ATOC administer the fares and agree revenue splitting from regulated fares between common TOCs on a line of route, and this forms the crux of the argument at hand.
How much revenue does Gatwick Express get then? Given that the company of that name is no longer trading, the answer is obviously £0. Therefore the revenue for services that are named Gatwick Express clearly goes to Southern. If this forms the 'crux of the argument' (I do not believe it does) this only supports our argument. Put it this way: a Southern RPI checking tickets on Gatwick Express can't use the "The Company I work for does not receive any revenue from this ticket" argument (not that such an argument really matters anyway as revenue does not determine validity... I could use my Huntington example as I have done before, but this post is getting too long... ;))
Correct. StanX and GatX are not TOCs.
Thank you! Now read NRCoC Condition 10 and consider that statement when you read it. I think you may come to the same conclusion as us.
 

DaveNewcastle

Established Member
Joined
21 Dec 2007
Messages
7,387
Location
Newcastle (unless I'm out)
My first post. Surely it is legitimate for any operator to create a ticket like Daysave and to specify on which services they intend it to be valid. . . . . .

Welcome!

I wonder if this condition will assist
4-5 RESTRICTIONS ON THE CREATION OF FARES

(5) The Rights and Restrictions applicable to a Fare may not prohibit a Purchaser of that Fare from travelling via a route which is one of the Permitted Routes for the Flow to which the Fare relates.

What Southern have to demonstrate is that they satisfy this condition
4-6 NATIONAL CLASSES OF ACCOMMODATION

(2) Use of carriages

(b) However, this does not prevent an Operator, by including an appropriate specification in the Rights and Restrictions, from Creating a Fare which also entitles the Purchaser to use carriages on that Operator’s trains which are not available to the Purchasers of other Fares, even if those Fares are designated with the same National Class of Accommodation.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top