joeykins82
Member
Ah OK, I missed that COV was getting a bay platform for the Nuneaton services.
-
Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Network Rail's New Station Fund - likely bidders?
- Thread starter Frothy
- Start date
- Status
Ah OK, I missed that COV was getting a bay platform for the Nuneaton services.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R
RailUK Forums
DarloRich
Veteran Member
But why let the facts get in the way of a good old wibbling
At 20m there must only be funding for one station anyway
Last edited:
swt_passenger
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 31,409
But why let the facts get in the way of a good old wibbling
At 20m there must only be funding for one station anyway
Maths fail there?
There's a £5m cap per project, so that's at least four...YorkshireBear
Established Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2010
- Messages
- 8,690
From another thread but felt it worth bringing this one up. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-21519170
LNW-GW Joint
Veteran Member
As I understand it from this announcement: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-stations-fund-proves-popular
Haxby is just one of 14 bids for the new stations DfT fund of £20m.
DfT and NR are working on the options and an announcement of the winner(s) will be made later this month.
Others mentioned:
Ilkeston
Low Moor
Kenilworth
Warrington West
Worcester Parkway
£20m is not much really, so there will be some disappointed bidders.
I can't see Kenilworth succeeding without the much more costly Coventry-Leamington upgrade scheme also being approved under CP5.
Haxby is just one of 14 bids for the new stations DfT fund of £20m.
DfT and NR are working on the options and an announcement of the winner(s) will be made later this month.
Others mentioned:
Ilkeston
Low Moor
Kenilworth
Warrington West
Worcester Parkway
£20m is not much really, so there will be some disappointed bidders.
I can't see Kenilworth succeeding without the much more costly Coventry-Leamington upgrade scheme also being approved under CP5.
Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
I do believe that a thread concerning Ilkeston railway station was opened on this website in recent times and is on this Infrastructure forum.
Low Moor seems like a never-ending story.
61653 HTAFC
Veteran Member
Am I right in thinking that Northern are opposed to the opening of Low Moor as it will cause yet more overcrowding and congestion on Caldervale services?
To me, if it gets built it should really be called 'Bradford Parkway' rather than Low Moor, and the powers that be really ought to make sure that the car parks are large enough, and have access from the nearby junction on the M606. The motorway junction itself is rather pointless atm as it serves only the adjacent industrial estate. Non-motorway access is via a tricky route along suburban streets!
I also understand that WYPTE plans for Low Moor involve only the Huddersfield-Selby and the stopping Leeds-Vic calling there, so that works against advertising it as an alternative to driving into the City centre though.
Apologies for continuing the diversion away from topic!
joeykins82
Member
I thought Kenilworth was a shoo-in; NR refer to a half-hourly Birmingham New Street to Leamington via Coventry and Kenilworth service as one of the benefits of having LDHS traffic removed from the south end of the WCML after HS2
YorkshireBear
Established Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2010
- Messages
- 8,690
I think certain schemes are far more likely to go ahead as many are not far off the drawing board but some are. Some may only ask for a few million funding so you never know...
Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
With regard to the posting that referred to the final decision/s that had to be made after the stated deadline of 25th February, it will be useful to note that when the successful Todmorden Chord/ Burnley Weavers Triangle bid from a similar scenario was decided, the news did not enter into the public domain for some time later.
The Planner
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2008
- Messages
- 15,946
It needs works at Leamington to use P4 but if they get funded then there is no reason why the service cannot work and it has been proven that a shuttle service can apparently.
Philip Elliott
Member
- Joined
- 9 Feb 2009
- Messages
- 807
The current plan is for more fast paths on the Stour line post HS2 not less. The problem of the 2nd XC path is all to do with the Kenilworth line not the Stour. Indeed pre-September 2004, there were 5 fast paths (2xVTWC, 2xSL, 1xVTXC) compared to the current 4 (3xVT, 1xXC).
swt_passenger
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 31,409
Hidden away amongst today's announcements was this:
WatcherZero
Established Member
- Joined
- 25 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 10,272
They were very optimistic thinking they could get 4, they would require significant amounts of funding from elsewhere. Cynically it was always going to be the ones with the highest third party contributions that would win so that they could announce our £20m unlocking XX investment. Perhaps we could see the remainder of the fund being used to finance 'further studies and refinement' at the losers.
Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
Those who were supporting the long-running Low Moor case must be somewhat downheartened by that news.
I'm disappointed not to see Peterlee in that list. There is a large population in East Durham that may as well be in a different country when it comes to travelling to other English regions. For example, if I arrive in my nearest station after early evening, I can't get home.
Admittedly all that is required is a better bus link to Durham, but this is not likely to happen either.
The 'transport poor' label to add to everything else.
Admittedly all that is required is a better bus link to Durham, but this is not likely to happen either.
The 'transport poor' label to add to everything else.
anthony263
Established Member
I must admit I wasnt expecting to see Pye corner station getting the go-ahead for re-opening. Was it even put into the WG's latest transport plan?
swt_passenger
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 31,409
What Grip stage was the new Peterlee station at? Does it have planning permission? Was it a 'shovel ready' scheme ready to be built during the next financial year? Is it mentioned in an RUS or Route business plan?
Did anyone even apply?
Gwenllian2001
Member
It's not a re-opening. It's a completely new station.
As are those supporting the long-running Haxby case!
Yeah, I honestly thought haxby would get it. There was more noise being made by haxby.
I think in the Haxby case WatcherZero could be right, with the key criteria being £Xm public money releasing £Ym private. Haxby's bid is based on the NSF money plus Council funds - there is no private sector funding involved. It will be disappointing if it doesn't go ahead, especially given the BCR of 6.19.
swt_passenger
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 31,409
I can't recall reading anywhere that 'third party funding' explicitly meant 'private'. The application forms just imply that third party funding has to come from someone other than DfT/NR/TOC as far as I can work out.
NR had this on their explanation for instance:
NR had this on their explanation for instance:
oglord
Member
On the site of Bassaleg Junction
Of course the station by itself is useless without the link from Park Junction to Gaer Junction and on to Newport High Street.
Gwenllian2001
Member
On the site of Bassaleg Junction
Of course the station by itself is useless without the link from Park Junction to Gaer Junction and on to Newport High Street.
Why would it be useless? I passed through the site of the proposed station today and it is in a thickly populated area. Why would passengers from Pye Corner not wish to travel to Cardiff? re the people living in the area any different to those at Rogerstone or Risca?
oglord
Member
I'd have no problem with them being able to travel to Cardiff if they were first able to travel to their own city centre! The current arrangement is ludicrous. Adding more stations without passenger services on GAE will just drain more people from the suburbs and Western Valley away from their natural destination.
Gwenllian2001
Member
I appreciate your frustration regarding the lack of service to Newport; it is long overdue. However, when the trains eventually do serve Newport it will not remove the many attractions of Cardiff and it will remain the destination of choice for many.The Millennium Centre will still be there as well as the Millennium Stadium and the vastly superior shopping facilities. I have nothing against Newport but you are comparing apples with oranges and to suggest that the new station should not be built until it can serve Newport sounds like a bit of a tantrum.
Everyone wants to see services to Newport, the sooner the better, and just as importantly, the extension to Ebbw Vale town. The present terminus is not an incentive to anyone who wishes to travel to Ebbw Vale.
Cardiff is Cardiff and Newport is Newport. Both have their attractions and people who wish to visit either will do so, with or without the train.
anthony263
Established Member
I most certainly agree the extension to Ebbw Vale town needs to be given the go ahead urgently as well as perhaps extending the passing loop northwards
- Status