Farage needs to appeal to a working class base to have any chance of making headway, as they've exhausted their growth in the old Tory stomping grounds. Farage won't alienate anyone by punishing Bloom, but he will potentially prevent traditional Labour supporters being driven away by him making headlines as a toffy old duffer, which isn't exactly their favourite sort of politician.
.
He has to manage that without revealing UKIP's economic policy or at least those parts (and there are many) that don't help the working class.
Taxation needs to be drastically reduced but only alongside equally drastic cuts in public spending. A Public Spending Review is not the object of this paper but UKIP can show how to reduce annual expenditure by £90 billion at a stroke without reducing major public services.
Pretty Libertarian thinking and not at all conductive to the working class' needs. Cuts to public services benefit those who can pay in the private sector - namely the rich.
People spend their money more wisely than politicians, only politicians would disagree.
People spend money on things which (usually directly) benefit them and their family. Politicians (for the most part) spend money on those things which benefit the nation and society. Two different things, and only government would ever spend money on infrastructure.
Political taxes raise very little revenue, the main thrust of UKIP tax policy will be flat tax with high thresholds, for too long the tax entry level has been too low. In an over generous welfare state this creates massive diversion from the original safety net concept of Beveridge to welfare life style choices. There is also astonishing complex tax administration.
Do you even need me to tell you why this is bad for the working class in a time when zero hour contracts are high, underemployment is high and unemployment is high and wages are shrinking in real terms?
The welfare state very rarely funds lifestyles and UKIP know this full well. They neglect to mention state pension is the highest DWP expense.
Flat tax is simple to administer and more importantly fair to everyone. Progressive tax rates mean regressive incentives. Tax is a form of confiscation of money from one group of citizens to arbitrarily give, by politicians, to another group.
Flat tax means the bottom pay a higher proportion. Granted their policy of raising the personal allowance is a good thing
Much of this revenue is wasted. Doctors and nurses we need, quangocrats and fat cats at the Town Hall we do not.
This promise has been made for as long as I have paid a passing interest to politics. It still hasn't been done. UKIP cronies no doubt will keep their important quango positions.
Income tax is the first port of call for radical reform. The tax free allowance pitched at £13,000 per year offers all workers a fair chance of keeping a significant amount of their own money. The allowance should be transferable between couples recognising that if one spouse remains at home to bring up a family they are an equally valuable member of society as a working partner.
This is good for the working class - as long as that £13,000 is per person rather than per couple in which case it's the opposite.
I also think voters are getting wise to the excuse that it's someone else's fault when it comes to policies after it's abuse by the coalition.
I wasn't alive for the Falklands War so could someone tell me if the situation in Gibraltar is similar to the Falklands?
Farage seems to think so whilst managing to ignore the possibility that we're doing the exact same thing at home :roll:
edit: This is what Farage reminds me of:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K63M1oMjfgA