• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Lines with non-clockface timetables

Status
Not open for further replies.

telstarbox

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
5,938
Location
Wennington Crossovers
Which lines have non-clockface timetables? Are they generally lines with a small number of services (less than 1 train per 2 hours)?

East Coast changed to a clockface timetable in May 2011 - were there any other main lines in recent years with irregular services?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,674
Location
Nowhere Heath
How recent are we talking? ATW introduced the clockface timetable down the Marches and more in 2005 (I think, it could have been 2006). Not exactly recent but in the grand scheme of railways it could be considered so.

Absolutely tons of lines without a clockface timetable still exist in the UK, the most obvious example that came to mind was the Heart of Wales line. Not even close to a pattern there!
 

Liam

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2010
Messages
1,246
Everything in and out of Inverness. It looks like they have tried to do 1tph Inverness-Dingwall, but there are some big gaps, especially in the evening.

Aberdeen-Glasgow/Edinburgh isn't quite clockface. The trains tend to leave Edinburgh and Glasgow at the same time each hour, but arrival and departure from Aberdeen varies by a few minutes each hour.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Fares Advisor
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
23,375
Location
Bolton
How far are we taking this? Knottingley to Goole? Serivces to and from Pontefract Baghill? The Whitby line? I guess you could argue some do have a pattern in a very abstract sense.

What about specific stations? Crewe - Stoke and Huddersfield - Mirfield with 2tph but at 5 - 55 min intervals?
 

IrishDave

Member
Joined
30 Jun 2009
Messages
380
Location
Brighton
One could perhaps argue that Southeastern's peak service out of Charing Cross and Cannon Street is not "clockface" - it conforms instead to a repeating 22-minute pattern, because the standard 20-minute pattern gains an extra train (and a 22-minute pattern is preferable to losing the only "blank path"). This gives rise to the 66-minute hour, which gives me a headache...

More seriously, though, there are plenty of lines which have a clockface timetable but lose it in the peaks - Chiltern, EMT and East Coast all spring to mind. Virgin at least keep most of the pattern in the evening peak, but their morning peak is all over the place. (By contrast, SWT keeps the clockface pattern running through both peaks, just with extra trains.)
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,414
...By contrast, SWT keeps the clockface pattern running through both peaks, just with extra trains.

In terms of departure/arrival times from Waterloo, I'd pretty much agree.

But the devil is in the detail - on the Bournemouth route you end up with the odd situation of the normal departure times, i.e. xx05/35 and xx09/39 but particular services are now going to different destinations, and other trains start splitting and joining 'down-route'. The off-peak Poole service becomes a Portsmouth via Eastleigh in the peak, making that latter route half hourly.

So looked at from the Waterloo perspective it will seem clockface nearly all day, but as seen from Southampton the peaks are quite different to the day time service.

(Vice versa in the morning peak of course.)
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,882
Location
Reston City Centre
Its hard to draw the line between a non-clockface service (relatively frequent trains, but not at an easy-to-remember gap) and irregular (only a handful of trains a day, like the HOWL, so little need for them to be at the same interval).

I'd argue that most of the lines in Lincolnshire (east of the ECML, south of the Cleethorpes line) are in this grey area - the Skegness service is fairly regular at the Nottingham end but messy at the Skeg end - the Peterborough - Lincoln service is hourly at times, but with some chunks missing and then at different times of later hours.

There's also the "no trains for ages and then two in a short period of time" like Helsby - Ellesmere Port, but that's for different reasons.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,414
There's is a debate about what 'clockface' really means. Compare two of SWT's main routes...

Some would say that the Waterloo - Southampton route isn't actually clock face because although they are the same times every hour, the four departures are not 15 mins apart. And the two fast departures do not serve the same intermediate calls, ie Basingstoke or Woking but not both.

OTOH the Waterloo to Guildford part of the Portsmouth route probably would be deemed a pretty much ideal 4 tph clockface service, with departures at xx00/15/30/45...

But in both cases, the off peak service only provides a misbalanced 3 tph to the 'main destination' of Portsmouth or Southampton. So does a true 'clockface' timetable require all of the departures, arrivals, and intermediate calls to be spread round the hour the same way? Because if so there are very few true clockface timetables outside of metro type services...
 

Muzer

Established Member
Joined
3 Feb 2012
Messages
2,773
clockface to me means you can ignore the hour hand for most of the day ;)
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,882
Location
Reston City Centre
There's is a debate about what 'clockface' really means. Compare two of SWT's main routes...

Some would say that the Waterloo - Southampton route isn't actually clock face because although they are the same times every hour, the four departures are not 15 mins apart. And the two fast departures do not serve the same intermediate calls, ie Basingstoke or Woking but not both.

OTOH the Waterloo to Guildford part of the Portsmouth route probably would be deemed a pretty much ideal 4 tph clockface service, with departures at xx00/15/30/45...

But in both cases, the off peak service only provides a misbalanced 3 tph to the 'main destination' of Portsmouth or Southampton. So does a true 'clockface' timetable require all of the departures, arrivals, and intermediate calls to be spread round the hour the same way? Because if so there are very few true clockface timetables outside of metro type services...

Good question.

For me, it'd be about the same times each hour (however unbalanced services were within that hour).

Even light rail/ Underground struggle to have perfectly equal gaps between every service (like the way the ten minute Yellow service and half hourly Purple service fit around each other on Sheffield Supertram), but they are generally at the same times the next hour.

Going off topic, Aberdeen used to have some stupidly timed bus services, there was one route (number 11) every sixteen minutes - probably the least easy to remember timetable I've seen.
 

talltim

Established Member
Joined
17 Jan 2010
Messages
2,454
EMT Sheffield to London is definitely not clockface. Witness the 06:47; 07:41; 07:47; 08:47; 09:35: 10:47; 11:47; 12:47; 13:47; 14:35; 15:47 (Which skips Chesterfield); 16:35; 17:35; 18:35 pattern
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I thought this article was interesting when I read it a couple of years ago (as it happened on the 15:47 from Sheffield when I was going supposed to going to Chesterfield!)
http://www.passengertransportnetwor...cgi?tag=Taktfahrplan&blog_id=1&IncludeBlogs=1
 
Last edited:

greatkingrat

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
2,764
The Worcester end of the Snow Hill lines is a regular 2tph, but the terminus seems to be picked at random from Shrub Hill or Foregate Street or both.
 

tractakid

Member
Joined
12 Nov 2012
Messages
852
Location
Milton Keynes
I was recently discussing something with a friend- stations where not one service departs at the same minutes past an hour as another- regardless of direction or destination.

I present you Broomfleet. And I challenge you to find a station with more departures where this still applies.

http://brtimes.com/#!board?stn=BMF
 

43074

Established Member
Joined
10 Oct 2012
Messages
2,017
The Cornish Main Line between London Paddington and Penzance is probably the only major route where clockface timetables do not apply (although Far South West departures leave Paddington at XX:06 the pattern West of Reading is somewhat more erratic).

Along the Dawlish Sea Wall the local service has irregular gaps of between 50 and 70 minutes between trains west of Dawlish Warren (e.g. Dawlish departures are at 11:16, 12:27, 13:24, 14:27 etc.) because of the need to allow faster London to Penzance services to overtake at Dawlish Warren.

West of Plymouth there is no clear pattern either. FGW departures are at:
07:02, 08:14, 09:21, 10:42, 11:20, 12:39, 13:11, 13:53, 15:12, 15:57, 16:29, 17:06 to Liskeard, 17:23, 17:55, 18:17 to Liskeard and 18:42 with origins including Plymouth, Exeter Central, Bristol Parkway and London Paddington via Berks and Hants or Bristol.

Also the Settle & Carlisle departures from Carlisle are not clockface either, but are roughly every 2 - 3 hours.
 
Last edited:

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
20,397
Location
0035
The Severn Beach line in suburban Bristol doesn't have a clockface timetable in that trains always depart at the same time past each hour, but with one exception they do depart at the same minutes past each hour every other hour during the day when heading outbound. The frequency is 3 trains every 2 hours.
 

PHILIPE

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Nov 2011
Messages
13,472
Location
Caerphilly
How recent are we talking? ATW introduced the clockface timetable down the Marches and more in 2005 (I think, it could have been 2006). Not exactly recent but in the grand scheme of railways it could be considered so.

Absolutely tons of lines without a clockface timetable still exist in the UK, the most obvious example that came to mind was the Heart of Wales line. Not even close to a pattern there!
At the moment a clock face timetable on the HOWL is virtually impossible due to the crossing points in the "wrong" places. If you crossed at "A" you would discover that the next train in the opposite direction would still be in the section between "B" and "C" and so on.
 

button_boxer

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
1,270
EMT Sheffield to London is definitely not clockface. Witness the 06:47; 07:41; 07:47; 08:47; 09:35: 10:47; 11:47; 12:47; 13:47; 14:35; 15:47 (Which skips Chesterfield); 16:35; 17:35; 18:35 pattern

This "semi-fast" used to be a clock face xx:20 starting from Derby, which was extended back to start at Sheffield a few years ago. It still fits into its clock face path from Derby southwards but is less regular at the Sheffield end, presumably to thread it around freight paths that pre-date the Sheffield extension.

I used to catch the 18:35 to Derby occasionally (if I'd missed the 18:27) and it always seemed to trundle along as if it had all the time in the world.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
13,305
Location
Isle of Man
There's also the "no trains for ages and then two in a short period of time" like Helsby - Ellesmere Port, but that's for different reasons.

Similar on the Airedale line.

From Leeds to Shipley, it is every 15 minutes.

From Shipley to Leeds, it is 4tph at 09/15/39/45.
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
7,078
Its hard to draw the line between a non-clockface service (relatively frequent trains, but not at an easy-to-remember gap) and irregular (only a handful of trains a day, like the HOWL, so little need for them to be at the same interval).

I'd argue that most of the lines in Lincolnshire (east of the ECML, south of the Cleethorpes line) are in this grey area - the Skegness service is fairly regular at the Nottingham end but messy at the Skeg end - the Peterborough - Lincoln service is hourly at times, but with some chunks missing and then at different times of later hours.

There's also the "no trains for ages and then two in a short period of time" like Helsby - Ellesmere Port, but that's for different reasons.

Or my local example, St Denys to Southampton Central, xx30 and xx31, aargh! A suburban station can surely do better than this, the old timetable a few years ago was much more even. The Sunday service is ironically much better. I could go into a rant about the terrible slots for connections given to the services which stop at St Denys, meaning a 35 min walk to Parkway or Central from home is often quicker, but I won't. :)
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,568
Its hard to draw the line between a non-clockface service (relatively frequent trains, but not at an easy-to-remember gap) and irregular (only a handful of trains a day, like the HOWL, so little need for them to be at the same interval).
I suppose you could say the Fishguard service is irregular, like HOWL, rather than just 'non-clockface'. However, the Fishguard example does show that having an irregular service run to a clockface pattern (with trains at the same points each hour, on the hours it actually runs) could be useful. That reason is connections with other services, which do run on a clockface service. Trying to make the vaugely-clockface bus service round here connect with the all-over-the-shop Fishguard rail service would be a pain, for example. Perhaps that's why they don't really seem to have bothered to make the buses connect.

clockface to me means you can ignore the hour hand for most of the day ;)
What about the Cambrian main line? Same number of mintues past the hour (in most cases, there are exceptions) but only every two hours (the odd hours, as far as Aberystwyth departures go).
 

12CSVT

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2010
Messages
2,612
I'm surprised Bletchley to Bedford isn't a clockface timetable, with some gaps of up to 90 minutes, given that it is the same two units shuttling up and down all day.
 

greatkingrat

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
2,764
I suppose you could say the Fishguard service is irregular, like HOWL, rather than just 'non-clockface'. However, the Fishguard example does show that having an irregular service run to a clockface pattern (with trains at the same points each hour, on the hours it actually runs) could be useful. That reason is connections with other services, which do run on a clockface service. Trying to make the vaugely-clockface bus service round here connect with the all-over-the-shop Fishguard rail service would be a pain, for example. Perhaps that's why they don't really seem to have bothered to make the buses connect.

A few years ago, Fishguard was the only perfectly clockface station in the country - trains every 12 hours exactly, 7 days a week!
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,958
Location
East Anglia
I'm surprised Bletchley to Bedford isn't a clockface timetable, with some gaps of up to 90 minutes, given that it is the same two units shuttling up and down all day.

Suppose that's for crew PNBs.
 

tractakid

Member
Joined
12 Nov 2012
Messages
852
Location
Milton Keynes
I'm surprised Bletchley to Bedford isn't a clockface timetable, with some gaps of up to 90 minutes, given that it is the same two units shuttling up and down all day.

Thankfully, the time I missed it was the shorter gap of 40 minutes I had to wait!
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,672
Location
Another planet...
Ormskirk-Preston was always a pain for this, especially as there's a perfectly serviceable loop at Rufford but not enough DMUs to provide a more frequent service. Of course the loop being where it is would mean a long turnaround at both ends- not a major issue at Ormskirk (bar the inefficiency) but particularly a problem for blocking platforms at Preston.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
18,033
Location
Airedale
Ormskirk-Preston was always a pain for this, especially as there's a perfectly serviceable loop at Rufford but not enough DMUs to provide a more frequent service.

Or not enough passengers to justify a 2-train service?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top