irish_rail
Established Member
Did my eyes deceive me, or did I see what looked like a 5 car Pendolino (and no it wasnt a Voyager!) heading up the WCML?!
Unlikely. Unless Alstom decided to split one in secrecy and test it. Even more unlikely.
What would be the point? What wouuld they need to test?
What would be the point? What wouuld they need to test?
A five car formation with one pantograph and half of the kit? Extremely unlikely and most likely the OP saw a 221 from a funny angle
Well it passed Stafford at approximately 11.00 on thursday (12th dec) heading north on the down relief.
With respect to some of the above comments, I am 100 percent sure it wasnt a super voyager, as I noticed that the coupling was only half covered over (as if it had been coupled to a 57, and the hatch door not properly re-closed).
Now as a train driver, I consider myself pretty observant, and have good attention to detail, so am fairly confident of what I saw, however the fact nobody else has any idea is making me question myself a little!
Well it passed Stafford at approximately 11.00 on thursday (12th dec) heading north on the down relief.
With respect to some of the above comments, I am 100 percent sure it wasnt a super voyager, as I noticed that the coupling was only half covered over (as if it had been coupled to a 57, and the hatch door not properly re-closed).
Now as a train driver, I consider myself pretty observant, and have good attention to detail, so am fairly confident of what I saw, however the fact nobody else has any idea is making me question myself a little!
Well it passed Stafford at approximately 11.00 on thursday (12th dec) heading north on the down relief.
With respect to some of the above comments, I am 100 percent sure it wasnt a super voyager, as I noticed that the coupling was only half covered over (as if it had been coupled to a 57, and the hatch door not properly re-closed).
Now as a train driver, I consider myself pretty observant, and have good attention to detail, so am fairly confident of what I saw, however the fact nobody else has any idea is making me question myself a little!
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/Y82074/2013/12/12/advanced
Could it be this? This is timed for a 221.
No chance, as the lines from Barton under Needwood TRSMD (Central Rivers Voyager depot) to Lichfield Trent Valley, and from Crewe to Chester, are unelectrified.
Could it be the 221 with the new front valances as per 222?
Then as a train driver you should know only former Western Region calls them relief lines, up here in Stafford they're slow lines, and yes I'm a driver myself.
But if it was a 221, why would that matter?
What can I call those lines that are next to the slows at Bletchley and in Milton Keynes if we aren't allowed to call them relief lines?
At Bletchley the lines next to the slow are Relief line 1 and Relief line 2.
Milton Keynes they are MK Reversible Fast and MK Reversible slow.
Simples !!
No, ive seen the new style Voyager front, definitely a Pendo and not a 221, but perhaps I somehow miss counted the carriages, its looking increasingly like this definately wasnt a 5 car Pendolino after all!
Excuse my ignorance...but what has changed with the front end of the Voyagers?
I don't know the correct terminology for it, but the skirt area where 221s used to have their set number has been replaced with a new style object. The set number used to be low down, close to track level, but is now higher up, near the height of the cab door.
I don't know the correct terminology for it, but the skirt area where 221s used to have their set number has been replaced with a new style object. The set number used to be low down, close to track level, but is now higher up, near the height of the cab door.
There is a picture on the North Wales Coast Railway Notice Board site.
Go to http://www.nwrail.org.uk/nw1308a.htm and scroll down to "Voyager Numbers etc."
Did it have a pantograph? That would rule out a voyager